Anonymous ID: d81375 Sept. 16, 2022, 4:44 p.m. No.17530087   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0113 >>0157 >>0179 >>0321

PDD/NSC 61 Energy Department Counterintelligence

February 1998

 

https://irp.fas.org/offdocs/pdd-tscm.htm

 

PDD/NSC 61 Energy Department Counterintelligence

February 1998

In 1995 US officials became concerned that China might have acquired sensitive information from American nuclear weapons laboratories in the mid-1980s. The administration began working to tighten security at our weapons labs and prevent future breaches. DOE prepared a broad assessment of two decades of Chinese efforts to acquire nuclear weapons information from the United States and in July 1997 briefed senior administration officials on its conclusions. DOE's briefings focused attention on the need to address long-term security problems at the US nuclear labs, and within weeks, the administration created a special working group of the National Counterintelligence Policy Board to make recommendations for strengthening lab security.

The board's recommendations, forwarded in September 1997, became the basis for a Presidential Decision Directive (PDD-61), issued in February 1998. In the directive, President Clinton ordered the Department of Energy to establish a stronger counterintelligence program. Then-Secretary Federico Pena set up an independent Office of Counterintelligence, which began an intensive review of the counterintelligence program. Energy Department implementation of the requirements of PDD-61 has included:

hiring counterintelligence professionals to be based at the weapons labs

doubling the budget for counterintelligence

changing the screening and the approval process for foreign scientists seeking access to DOE labs

making the lab directors directly accountable for foreign visits.

instituting more extensive security reviews including the use of polygraphs for DOE scientists working in sensitive programs.

The text of PDD-61 has not been released, and there is no White House Factsheet summarizing its provisions. However, one component of this PDD, relating to Technical Surveillance Countermeasures (TSCM), is reproduced here.

 

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

October 5, 1998

 

NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:

Chris Kielich, 202/586-5806

Richardson Names Director For

DOE's Office of Intelligence

https://irp.fas.org/news/1998/10/pr98137.htm

Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson has selected Lawrence H. Sanchez to be the Director of the Office of Intelligence at the U.S. Department of Energy. As director, Sanchez will be responsible for foreign intelligence analysis and work closely with DOE's nonproliferation, nuclear weapons, stockpile stewardship and counterintelligence programs. The Office of Intelligence prepares and publishes current intelligence on political, military, economic and technical aspects of foreign developments affecting the department's missions. Sanchez will serve the Energy Department on detail from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) beginning at the end of October.

 

"Lawrence Sanchez's outstanding background in foreign intelligence will be a strong addition to the Department of Energy's extensive programs to safeguard the nation's nuclear security," said Secretary Richardson.

 

A CIA intelligence officer since 1984, Sanchez has served as the Executive Assistant to CIA's Executive Director and as an Assistant National Intelligence Officer for Strategic Programs. His career also has included four years in CIA's Nonproliferation Center, a one-year tour as a deputy team chief for Intermediate Nuclear Forces inspections in the Former Soviet Union, and three years as an imagery analyst

Anonymous ID: d81375 Sept. 16, 2022, 5 p.m. No.17530157   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0179 >>0191 >>0321

>>17530087

Here we go

Did we have this noted?

We know how they love exercises as precursor events.

 

"aurora thunder"

urora Thunder Tabletop Exercise | Minneapolis, MN region

27 July 2022

8:30 AM – 4:30 pm Central

Huntington Bank Stadium Club Cambria Room

https://silentthunder.sandia.gov/aurora-thunder

University of Minnesota, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) are hosting a hybrid tabletop exercise (TTX) on weapons of mass destruction (WMD) terrorism entitled “Aurora Thunder” on July 27, 2022, 0830-1630. The TTX will be held in Club Cambria Room of the Huntington Bank Stadium on campus, with online observers using ZoomGov and Slido to participate in the discussion.

Aurora Thunder will focus on a terrorist-created WMD/radiological incident affecting both the University of Minnesota and the greater Minneapolis-St. Paul community. Aurora Thunder is part of the Silent Thunder Exercise Series designed to foster collaboration among representatives from local, state, and federal agencies with a shared stake in ensuring a positive outcome.

The Silent Thunder exercise series provides a no-fault, site-specific TTX where leaders from all responding and stakeholder organizations can exercise both their crisis and consequence management capabilities for a terrorist WMD incident.

Anonymous ID: d81375 Sept. 16, 2022, 5:07 p.m. No.17530191   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17530157

One more upcoming

1887 Thunder

1887 Thunder Tabletop Exercise

Hilton Raleigh North Hills Hotel

RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA OCTOBER 19, 2022: 0900 - 1630

https://silentthunder.sandia.gov/1887-thunder

EVENT INFORMATION

NC State University, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) are hosting a Silent Thunder tabletop exercise (TTX) on weapons of mass destruction (WMD) terrorism entitled “1887 Thunder” from October 19, 2022, 0900 - 1630.

 

1887 Thunder will focus on a terrorist-created WMD/radiological incident affecting both NC State University and the local hospitals. 1887 Thunder is part of the Silent Thunder Exercise Series designed to foster collaboration among representatives from local, state, and federal agencies with a shared stake in ensuring a positive outcome.

Anonymous ID: d81375 Sept. 16, 2022, 5:38 p.m. No.17530335   🗄️.is 🔗kun

This idea of the Office of POTUS using NSD's as policy has been on the radar for quite some time. Here's a GAO report from Jan 1992.

 

https://irp.fas.org/offdocs/gao-nsiad-92-72.pdf

 

Executive orders, on the other hand, do not generally cover foreign policy

guidance or military strategy and are generally instructions to executive

branch officials about the performance of their duties. Many executive

orders are issued under specific statutory delegations from Congress to

the President. When the President issues an executive order under such

authority, the order carries the force and effect of law. Executive orders

are almost always unclassified, are readily available to the Congress and

the general public, and most are published in the Federal Register under

the Federal Register Act of 1936 (44 U.S.C. 1506

Anonymous ID: d81375 Sept. 16, 2022, 6:01 p.m. No.17530516   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Traces of explosives in 9/11 dust, scientists say

By Deseret News

Apr 7, 2009, 2:00am EDT

Elaine Jarvik

https://www.deseret.com/2009/4/7/20311250/traces-of-explosives-in-9-11-dust-scientists-say

 

Tiny red and gray chips found in the dust from the collapse of the World Trade Center contain highly explosive materials — proof, according to a former BYU professor, that 9/11 is still a sinister mystery.

 

Physicist Steven E. Jones, who retired from Brigham Young University in 2006 after the school recoiled from the controversy surrounding his 9/11 theories, is one of nine authors on a paper published last week in the online, peer-reviewed Open Chemical Physics Journal. Also listed as authors are BYU physics professor Jeffrey Farrer and a professor of nanochemistry at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark.

 

For several years, Jones has theorized that pre-positioned explosives, not fires from jet fuel, caused the rapid, symmetrical collapse of the two World Trade Center buildings, plus the collapse of a third building, WTC-7.The next step, Jones said in a phone interview on Monday, is for someone to investigate "who made the stuff and why it was there."Jones made headlines in 2005 when he argued that the rapid and symmetrical fall of the World Trade Center looked like the result of pre-positioned explosives. He argued that fires alone wouldn't have been hot enough to crumble the buildings; and that even if struck by planes, the towers should have been strong enough to support the weight of the tops as they crumbled — unless they were leveled by explosives.