>>17535857

>old model universe, and not it's true electrical nature.

mainstream science is reluctant to let go of the "big bang" cosmology for the OBVIOUS reason that it's where the research money is going to go. NO ONE on a review committee will vote to fund research that will ultimately prove that THEY wasted their life chasing a wild goose.

but just because "science" is wrong about cosmology, does NOT make your half-assed hairbrain "electric universe" any less ridiculous. take your BS back to YT where there's an audience of retards who will give you a thumbs up.

>>17535894

*harebrained

>>17535901

>>17535909

>are you simply refuting it because you have been lied to your entire life?

right. you're spreading your retarded bullshit around the globe in milliseconds using technology ranging from AC generation, to microwaves, integrated circuits, microprocessors, geosynchronous satellite links, yada, yada, yada, but EVERYTHING i know about electricity and magnetism is a lie.

one of us is a FUCKING RETARD, and you can get good odds on which.

>>17535942

>Radiological isotope found on the moon

FACT

>it MUST have come from our sun.

SPECULATIVE THEORY

>>17536002

>they found the glass spheres on the surface

FACT

>They have known about the SUN since the Apollo missions

SPECULATIVE THEORY

you dimwits REALLY need to learn the difference between facts, and theories made up to explain them before you embarrass yourselves in "sciency" debates.

>>17535939

>How many years it takes the Earth to do a complete circle around the center of the Milkyway.

roughly 2.5 MILLION yrs for the milky way disc to do one rotation. the earth and our solar system do NOT REVOLVE around the center of the galaxy so much as the entire galaxy rotates "as a whole."

>>17536027

>you dimwits REALLY need to learn the difference between facts, and theories made up to explain them before you embarrass yourselves in "sciency" debates.

i'm NOT disputing the FACTS,

butLIKE I SAID

you dimwits REALLY need to learn the difference between facts, and theories made up to explain them before you embarrass yourselves in "sciency" debates.

>>17536035

>Recent computer models

MODELS are NOT FACTS, asshat. LEARN THE DIFFERENCE.

>this theory of the origin of the Moon

THEORIES are NOT FACTS, asshat. LEARN THE DIFFERENCE.

>was trapped in the lunar soil as a permanent record of solar activity throughout this time.

THAT is NOT a FACT. the existence of artifacts is a fact. the ORIGIN of the artifacts is SPECULATION.

WHAT FUCKING PART OF THIS IS NOT REGISTERING IN YOUR TINY PEA BRAIN?

>>17536037

>I am highly interested in this subject and would love whatever information I can find.

bullshit. if you REALLY wanted to UNDERSTAND the subject, you would go to a LIBRARY, get some college textbooks, and educate yourself. clearly you're too lazy to do that, and your "interest" amounts to a passing fancy, like a child fascinated by a soap bubble, which will likely last longer than your attention span. what kind of FUCKWIT comes to 8kun for a science education? KYS, or go back to TikTok where you belong.