reading pages 440-460, redlining not in graphic form yet. Concern about agents expressing personal views in gov't texts, I.M.s and emails:
Attorney 2 doesn't like the Republic. To say that "I have initiated the Republic's destruction", WTF does that mean, "I am actively treasoning" ?
Among the general discussion of political issues by FBI Attorney 2, we
identified three instant message exchanges that raised concerns of potential bias.
The first of these exchanges was on October 28, 2016, shortly after Comey’s
October 28 letter to Congress that effectively announced the reopening of the
Midyear investigation. FBI Attorney 2 sent similar messages to four different FBI
employees. The timestamps of these messages are included below. The messages
stated:
13:44:42, to FBI Employee 1: “I mean, I never really liked the
Republic anyway.”
13:44:52, to FBI Employee 2: “I mean, I never really liked the
Republic anyway.”
14:01:52, to FBI Employee 3: “As I have initiated the destruction of
the republic…. Would you be so kind as to have a coffee with me this
afternoon?”
15:28:50, to FBI Employee 4: “I’m clinging to small pockets of
happiness in the dark time of the Republic’s destruction”
A lot of trying to excuse expressions of anger towards and intent to thwart Trump as "personal views" and private communications between friends.
anyone got an easy way to turn these pages in to graphics for redlining?