>>1754080

>>1754103

>>1754116

me

>ask reasonable questions about why Q was wrong about redactions, and why horowitz isn't playing ball and being honest about comey's political bias and HRC's "gross negligence"

this board

>U CAN GET LOST U MISBELIEVER Q IS REAL IF U WANT TO BELIEVE IN HIM BUT WE DONT HAVE TO ANSWER UR QUESTIONS OR PROVIDE THEORIES TO BACK UP WHAT HE SAYS

why can't you just honestly explain why horowitz (who Q told us to trust) really fucked us today? and no this isn't some long-con 4d intergalactic backgammon, horowitz was the best and most impartial entity we had to make serious accusations of misconduct in the FBI and re open the hillary case, and he flopped over like a dead fish (in an elaborate 500 page way)

>>1754278

ok but do you have any clue who horowitz is or how seriously he takes his work/office/position?

there is no way he lets rod rosenstein completely rewrite his 500 page manifesto on fbi malfeasance surrounding the clinton case while exonerating comey and sits there and takes it quietly…

he would have protested a long time ago that his work was being compromised, or he is compromised himself

can anyone explain to me why rod rosenstein was (if this is true) allowed to edit the OIG's report?