I never even mentioned you, it could have been multiple anons I was talking about yet you were the first to respond to in an attempt to justify yourself over my displeasure. I was growing to like you, Anime, but your actions tonight destroyed that. I can't be the only one. I will always believe you chose poorly last bread and now we'll all live with the consequences.
>17541663
A whim? KEK. You notabled something on a whim. Something Gary wanted you to.
Don't talk to me anymore.
>17541683
You don't listen very well. Go back and look at how it was presented and the three fucking iterations it went to before they settled on one. It does not add up.
>>17541694 (me)
went *through
When a key fact of said "notable" changes three times in one bread and not one 3rd party source can be verified from the actual source, yeah, I have a big problem with that. Especially when it was first posted it had a completely wrong date that can not be mistaken when looked at the "article" then something does not add up. That and the font is too crisp for a paper from the 30s. Planting myself beside the river of truth. You move, fucker.
>>17541769 (me)
Not to mention this article that no one here has seen before, let alone the shills never spammed, the very day after we spot the 666 symbology of King Chuckles the 3rd.
I'm dropping this bullshit. Fuck it. Such a shame.
So why then when they first posted it did they claim it was '67?
Then when I said, "Hey, it says '37, not '67" then the '33 came out.
Then when I said, "This is a 3rd party, what about the actual source?" To which I was told it's conveniently behind a paywall.
Then when I said, "The font looks off" then regular spam started
It's obvious to me.
It had nothing to do with "The Jews" and everything to do with the changing of the date.
Where do you get that I have a bias against anything mentioning Jews? That's a new one. Verifiable facts I fully support. Accusations and National Enquirer 3rd party sources of a source are what I have problems with. If in the end it turns out that, "Hey, it really was them" I wouldn't be surprised, nor care. It would just be.
I made my case. I think you fucked up by notabling it and I will stand by that.
I'm a reasonable anon, Anime, and I've more than proven my patriotism to this cause, but think next time.
If that's how you view me then I'm afraid I'll have to return the favor. Does that make sense to you? Filtered. Permanently.
Now the wave of melancholy earlier today makes sense.
I see now what my worth is to this board.
This is my last post here.