>>17544009
not likely that a state leader would meet the queen and could only say two english words.
just count how many word´s he would use greeting her. obviously there would be no translater for the
>hello your majesty, pleased to meet you
>thank you
>yes
>no
>please
only two words? nope, not exactly likely.
so then why would the Queen make that statement, again, at a time a camera is guiding her doing a dokumentary on her life?
why say
>ONLY TWO words of english
when it obviously was rather like not more than 10 words
why mention that at all? obviously a women who´s job it is since many years to interact diplomatically is aware that both english is considered a key skill for top politicians and that it´s quite offensive to say, on camera, that
>this dude was to stupid to even speak english
that is not what she said. she gave symbolism, intentionally when camera running obviously.
I get it why you did it like that for a long time. but right now symbolism is an obstacle bc pretty much the whole world shouts
>7