>>17548811

o7

>>17548983

> never once been confirmed by Q

nor condoned by Q

>>17549089

So did Q condone the Clock graphic and it's use?

>>17549134

You could be right, yet I think if it were a major issue Q would have mentioned it. It is a complicated subject by it's very nature…

If it is confusing to US then it's confusing to THEM - and may have it's role to play in the fog of war.

o7