>>17549324 pb

I've read drops here and there and been on the board for like 18 months, I'm not this new and didn't ask to be spoon fed. I was just saying that I never read all drops systematically from start to finish, also I don't just read the drops but also checking the pol archives to see what anons replied and researching topics mentioned in the drops, so there's a reason I am slow. I don't think you can get the big picture by just reading drops. After all, one wouldn't need to read the drops if he knew all the answers to the questions Q stated in his drops. I asked the question in regards to the topic we were discussing so we could relate the research at hand back to the info Q gave us.

>>17549544

>>17549551

kek

thanks anons, I'm not upset. I usually ignore everytime but IMO defending myself sometimes is justified and reasonable.

>>17549568

>>17549474

>>17549482

It's a common theme throughout many of his writings, like iirc he even wrote that the JFK assassination was fake. Not sure if true but IMO he's generally right in saying that basically almost every news story is completely fake.