Anonymous ID: f115e4 Sept. 21, 2022, 6:01 a.m. No.17554839   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>17554811

Garland broke the law when he ordered an illegal raid on Trump's home.

Garland lied to the world when he said he only communicates in court filings right before his DOJ illegally leaked to the media.

Garland broke the law when he ordered communications blackout from DOJ to Congress.

 

Garland is a criminal.

 

It's not 'if you don't support mY tEaM then you go to prison", because the LAW does NOT bind only on one team or the other. You break the law, you should be punished.

Anonymous ID: f115e4 Sept. 21, 2022, 6:04 a.m. No.17554845   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>17554834

>>17554811

And add to that, the poster invoked a logic that to not be a Trump supporter you have to support law breaking, as if legal actions should be associated to Trump supporters and illegal actions should be associated to Biden supporters.

 

These people are braindead, projecting their own 'your team my team' dialectic, completely avoiding THE LAW.

Anonymous ID: f115e4 Sept. 21, 2022, 6:18 a.m. No.17554912   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4932

>>17554887

>despite being laughed out of court

The courts were not presented with the full evidence.

 

They did not include 2000 Mules.

They did not include The Pit revelations of EMS databases being programmed by CCP.

 

Your entire meme is just what the fake news' HOPED FOR narrative.

 

And they were given that to keep them distracted while the full work continued.

Anonymous ID: f115e4 Sept. 21, 2022, 6:58 a.m. No.17555065   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5077

>>17554939

It is possible because the human mind has the capacity to self-reflect on its own reflections, in an iterative looping pattern where what was can be added to with new freely formed information objects that can be compared with each other.

 

And since each of us are sufficiently complex formal systems, the most complex thus far known, we can speak about what is happening when we speak about ourselves.

 

Since the 'I' doing the thinking remains constant, we can see ourselves as outputting information objects as either consistent or inconsistent with each other with themselves and with ourselves as the source.

 

Then we can see ourselves as 'compared' withโ€ฆNOT ourselves, since any additional element is not completing of the full set, so we think about the full set not being ourselves in our finite bodies living temporarily within time.

 

Then we compare ourselves with more and more 'what we are NOT' additions, which ancient thinkers like Plotinus did to the extreme, which was the creation of 'The Dialectic' as an ontological category of nature.

 

That 'dialectic' code, of introducing information objects in the form of 'opposites', is still held to this day by some people as the ultimate defining characteristic of all reality, that nothing is really real apart from its negation or opposite.

 

Some have 'weaponized' this code not by reflecting on the 'natural' negations of what things naturally are not, but by what Lenin said to 'accelerate the contradictions', meaning, DELIBERATELY INTRODUCE lies, deception, destruction, murder, blackmail, introduce as many 'negations' into civilization as possible, and the bait and switch is to label those KNOWING inconsistencies as ALSO 'just part of the natural order of opposites'.

 

Then it gets more crazy.

 

Those introductions of evil intent are viewed as just a force hidden in empirical history revealing itself by introducing conflicts and inconsistencies as a means to understand ITSELFโ€ฆover time, where time is considered an element of the absolute realizing its own absoluteness by using up humans and discarding them along the way through time.

 

And its gets even more crazy.

 

EVEN IF the knowing introductions of 'contradictions' are so contradictory to human life that it results in 100 million dead bodies, as under communist logic (coded with exact same dialectic), then that is also just the 'geist' of history understanding itself, the perpetrators are not responsible they're just the 'conduits' of history.

 

This is why Hegel praised 'world historical figures' like Napolean. The bigger the wars, the more people who can be killed, the more money that can be made, the 'closer' the introducers of the dialectic believe they are THEMSELVES becoming 'absolute' alongside 'the idea', of Geist, that is driving everything.

 

The most depraved acts are the raping and killing of defenseless children. The dialectic code WELCOMES Satanic Pedophiles who believe they are becoming Gods by hurting and killing everything and everyone 'material' that are closest to God.

 

It is also why there is so much invocations of 'anti' religion, like anti-Judaism, anti-Christianity and anti-Islam, and not just in the form of spoken word, but PRAXIS, where the Theory of the dialectic IS ITSELF only what it is by being 'practiced' in the empirical temporal order.

 

And the more 'negations' are introduced, where those negations are PROJECTED as literally defining the ontological reality of the people OUTSIDE that ideology, they are considered 'fetters' to the introducer's own quest for absoluteness in their dialectic ideology.

 

This is why those who dissent from the communist logic are labelled as 'going against history'.

 

There is a much bigger 'war' that has been taking place in the informational realm, in the 'logic of reality' realm, and what we are 'seeing' is the result of an ancient dialectic code FINALLY getting exposed for the world to see.

 

This Anon does not believe it is a coincidence that Durham's logic was introduced into court by focusing on INCONSISTENCY INJECTION into the "intelligence community" (I.e. Sussman introducing the lie to the FBI of what sourced HIS actions).

Anonymous ID: f115e4 Sept. 21, 2022, 7:42 a.m. No.17555314   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>17555084

>>17555170

Since out of all the possible actions you could have taken at this time, you decided to attack this board, and attack Anons, your actions are themselves self-evident proof that your actions contradict the content of your posts.

 

What you are in actuality trying to do is LESSEN the power over information that this site and Anons represent, by invoking an inconsistency between the information associated with your body and the information associated with your words, and you are relying on a dialectic faith that your inconsistencies will become trusted and 'ingested' as describing the ontological reality of Anons.

 

All you are in fact doing is trying desperately to remain informational authority over your own informational contradictions that you're projecting onto Anons, as if your contradictory set IS the set that defines Anons to be as inconsistent as you are admitting yourself to be by your actions and the content of your posts.

 

You're here because you want everything you're saying that contradicts your body which never lies, to become trusted by Anons so that Anons become as self-alienated as you are, so that Anons get replugged back into the dialectic matrix where you live, asleep.

 

The TRUTH that you are in fact offering here, is the SAME TRUTH you're attacking and trying to 'negate'.

 

It's self-negations all the way down for you panicking shills.

 

You morons can't meme, you can't offer any CONSISTENT set of information, because your code is garbage.

 

Garbage in, garbage out.