>>1755735

WOOF! Wow!

>>1755751 (last bread)

1. Hitlery

2. Lynn

3. Hussein

4. Clapper

5. Page (crying hysterically)

6. Strzok??

7-150 media trying to figure out what they can write off all our digging.. last is prob friendlies

>>1755792

YES ABSOLUTELHY

>>1755870

ANSWER IS always YES. Why? Because even the notion of an improper courtroom is enough to have a judge recuse so the defendant can be guaranteed an unbiased trial.

I know POTUS is for the police and all, but I am telling you there are a LOT of local PD’s who are SOOOO corrupt.. DA/s to the beat cops and fucking lacky POT COPS.. it is all bad, and with Minimum sentencing.. what a nightmare.

>>1756051

Nice rack beanz

>>1756053

This is the rub/tug that is Qresearch. We go out and scour the interwebbings to come back and see we were chasing our tails.. all good, feck I have learned a whole hell of a lot by side searches that none of my friends want to know about KEK! Hehehe. Oh wells.

>>1756069

Crochet bra? What ess dis you speak of?!