So, a NSA tape of tarmac meeting exists. Could it be the tape Q refers to? When Judicial Watch tried to help a citizen obtain info, they used a refusal based on an EO of Hussein's. Has our POTUS voided that EO with his own yet to declassify? Excerpt of said case follows:

CITIZEN RESEARCHER LARRY KAWA IS PRESSING THE GOVERNMENT TO RELEASE THE CONTENTS OF A TAPING SYSTEM THAT IS REQUIRED TO HAVE BEEN INSTALLED ON LYNCH’S GOVERNMENT AIRPLANE. KAWA POINTS TO THE TEMPEST SYSTEM, A NATO-CERTIFIED SYSTEM BY WHICH THE NSA TRACKS AND RECORDS SOUND THAT EMANATES WITHIN GOVERNMENT STRUCTURES

To respond to your request, NSA would have to confirm or deny the existence of intelligence records on Loretta Lynch,” the NSA wrote in their response on November 14, 2016. “Were we to do so in your case, we would have to do so for every other requester. This would enable, for example, a terrorist or other adversary to file an FOIA request with us in order to determine whether he or she was under surveillance or had evaded it. This is turn would allow that individual to better assess whether they could successfully act to damage the national security of the United States. For such reasons, we can neither confirm nor deny the existence or non-existence of the records you requested.”

Kawa then wrote to the NSA FOIA office to challenge them on their denial. Here’s their response.

OUR LETTER DATED 14 NOVEMBER 2016 IS INDEED OUR FINAL RESPONSE TO YOUR FOIA REQUEST. IT STATES THAT THE “FIRST EXEMPTION” OF THE FOIA AUTHORIZES, BY EXECUTIVE ORDER, PROPERLY CLASSIFIED INFORMATION TO BE KEPT SECRET AND GOES ON TO SAY THAT THE FACT OF EXISTENCE OR NON-EXISTENCE OF INTELLIGENCE RECORDS ON ANY INDIVIDUAL IS AN APPROPRIATELY CLASSIFIED MATTER. THE “FIRST EXEMPTION” IS OFTEN REFERRED TO AS THE “B(1) EXEMPTION” TO WHICH YOU REFER.

WE ALSO PROVIDE BACKGROUND INFORMATION REGARDING THE DECISION, AS WELL AS THE SPECIFIC PARAGRAPH OF E.O. 13526 WHICH AUTHORIZES THE TYPE OF RESPONSE, WHICH IS OFTEN CALLED A “GLOMAR” RESPONSE.

http:// thewashingtonstandard.com/nsa-wont-release-clintonlynch-tarmac-tape-claims-national-security/

when WikiLeaks released an email from Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik tipping off John Podesta, the Chair of Hillary Clinton’s campaign, to developments in the probe of her use of the private server while Secretary of State. Using his private Gmail account, Kadzik wrote to Podesta on May 19, 2015, approximately one month after Hillary Clinton had announced her candidacy:

“There is a HJC [House Judiciary Committee] oversight hearing today where the head of our Civil Division will testify. Likely to get questions on State Department emails. Another filing in the FOIA case went in last night or will go in this am that indicates it will be awhile (2016) before the State Department posts the emails.”

Putting together Lynch’s private tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton and Kadzik’s leaking tips to Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair and the U.S. Justice Department seems to be confirming the FBI agents’ worst fears about a politically obstructed investigation.

Kadzik had been Podesta’s attorney during the Kenneth Starr investigation of Bill Clinton’s sexual involvement with Monica Lewinsky when she worked as an intern at the White House. Podesta was investigated for his potential role in helping Lewinsky get a job outside of the White House. In an email released by WikiLeaks from 2008, Podesta writes that Kadzik is a “Fantastic lawyer. Kept me out of jail.”

Kadzik is currently the Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs at the Justice Department. According to his official bio at the Justice Department, he “led the successful effort to confirm Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch and Deputy Attorney General Sally Q. Yates.” Kadzik joined the Justice Department in April 2013 after 30 years at the corporate law firm Dickstein Shapiro LLC, a 60-year old law firm that went out of business this past February.

Yesterday, Senator Chuck Grassley sent a letter to the Inspector General of the Justice Department asking for an investigation into the multiple conflicts of interests that have been publicly disclosed thus far. Grassley called out the following additional issues surrounding Kadzik:

Mr. Kadzik lobbied Mr. Podesta for then-President Bill Clinton to pardon Marc Rich. On this point, the House Committee on Government Reform found that Mr. Kadzik was hired by Marc Rich because of his connections with Mr. Podesta.

>>1756499

Forgot link. Apologies.

http:// wallstreetonparade.com/2016/11/secret-recordings-emerge-in-clinton-foundation-probe/

Stage set for bombshell IG report on Clinton email case: Who's in the crosshairs?

http:// www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/13/stage-set-for-bombshell-ig-report-on-clinton-email-case-whos-in-crosshairs.html