>>17561837

because it's true.

all the executive power flows from the office of the President.

national security is an executive function.

realize, anon… this case is very much about the question of how much power the bureaucracy has over the executive office of the President. POTUS is purposefully proving a point here.

Once the docs come out (and they will), the public will see that this bureaucracy was simply trying to bury docs that proved their own treason. The public will never give the administrative state such deference. It all needs to be torn down. We've become a bureaucratic state - ie, communist state.

>>17561803

meant for >>17562207

>>17561803

"make it, so hard"….

most of the population has been propadandized to believe that the administrative state IS the authority in the US. not so.. they are agents of the 3 branches, who in turn derive all their power from the public.

in simple terms, the population needs un-learn their conditioning, and be comfortable treating any bureaucrats as the turds that they are. fuck the bureaucrats.

it's so bad, that they are saying POTUS has to defer to them on matters of national security (and many others…).

>>17561803

POTUS is purposefully putting this out their to try and wake people up, such as (((you))) need, apparently.

he's making a point. fuck the bureaucrats. they don't tell POTUS what to do. he tells them what to do. he answers only to the public.

>>17562136

isn't a "truss" something one wears if they have a huge cock (no homo)?

maybe Liz wears a truss?