Posting Early for Ultimate Visibility in Thread

I just had a heavy experience of deja vu (around 7:40AM UTC), interestingly while playing a game while watching The Matrix for the umpteenth time.

It wasn't vague it was: "I have been in this exact moment of perception before".

The thought before that was "I wonder if anons ever thought about making a vision thread".

A sort of place where those of us that have visions, whether by drugs, medical (like comatose or death, etc, etc.), meditation, prayer, dreams that seem prophetic, night terrors/moments, notable moments of deja vu, activations, revelations, etc, etc.

I think it could be really beneficial for those of us of the esoteric side of things, if we had a place where we could easily collect, read, and perhaps even bring meaning to the things that we have witnessed.

Thoughts?

>>1756568

I imagine so, but I'm interested in reading those of us here that have had them. That way, we can be sure we won't be following Stars as none of us would have a real identity to follow.

>>1756570

Excellent. I'll think on it more and I suggest others that are interested do, too. We might need to think of new ways to conduct that thread to ensure that we don't follow any particular poster simply because of their ID. (So, propose that every post falls under a different ID? Can this be done?)

Obviously, if one vision relates to another, the poster can just reply to the other one. The IDs will be different, but if the content is still true, the ID being different won't matter.

>>1756596

Hm. That is difficult. I do not want to be the gatekeeper of any information, even if it's from the outside. Be careful who you follow does not mean we shouldn't follow anyone.

What we could do is that each has a dedicated thread within a thread And then the discussion happens under each topic thread. That way, if for whatever reason and anon doesn't want to see the thread "bogged down" (in their view) by any one person with an actual identity (non-anons), or any series of related "Perceptive Experiences" —

>>1756591

(I liked that and that's a good idea, perhaps!)

—

They could simply hide the originating comment and the comment line themselves.