>>1757177

here's what gets me - these conversations aren't 'smoking guns' in the sense that they prove a cabal cover-up, but they show a false understanding of what happened.

it points to manipulation at a higher level. "they didn't watch the debates?" "aren't fully educated on his policies?" "poor to middle class" = "uneducated, lazy POS"

it shows that even they aren't paying attention, or also only exist in an echo chamber.

it reeks of "DIVIDE".

maybe we needed to see this for another reason. maybe the point is that even these people are just people.

dunno. just thinking through some of this.

>>1757199

and then i argue internally, but THEY WORK FOR THE FBI.

how can they NOT take themselves seriously if they work there. someone else said in a thread last night that duh, Page was smart, she's just playing dumb because they're good at it, to get out of shit.

what the hell ever happened to the sanctity of work? why aren't these people proud/able to just worry about the letter of the law, regardless of who sits in the oval office?

>>1757208

but reading the texts.

reading the testimony after the fact.

these aren't even pseudo-intellectuals.

these are patsies. i can't imagine how they would function in a real office, filled with real people doing real work. now i want to read everything they've ever written because what the hell is going on at the FBI that they'd hire such mush-headed malleable goons?

taken at face value, these people were installed specifically because they are fuck-ups.

>>1757213

RSA boards…here?

>>1757216

no, it isn't agenda. it is at the top, sure, but the low-levels like this don't have "globalist" intentions. these are people who get suckered into "my poem won, i just need to pay $200 to get the book" scams.

to them, working at the FBI is the prize. ha.

>>1757222

it's the same on both sides, though. the pendulum swings.

in any case, that's all i wanted to point out. multiple hive minds.

>>1757251

well hey, that's interesting. big fan of math in general. is there a secret entrance, or am i already looking at why i'm too dumb to find the front door?

>>1757261

i tried pointing out several elements which placed the picture in the 2014-2016 range, but got shouted down.

what i find really interesting - if you think about each element independently - is that there really isn't a time/date marker you can rely on.

it's an s-class at a united plane. the plane design has existed since at least 2014. the mercedes service has existed since 2013. the s-class layout (panels/fans/clock/screen) has been the same shape for 4 or 5 years.

the only thing i can find as isolating is the phone itself. the distinct lack of sensor/camera on the top left corner, AND the wide "top banner" indicates to me that the phone is a few generations old at least. even if it's an iphone with a modification of some sort…it's 2016 at the latest.

worth considering that it's "evidence" rather than "proof".

>>1757263

13 angry Dems?