>>17565054 (pb) Alex Jones verdict
This will have important implications when people start realizing all the people claiming vaccine injuries and deaths of family were gaslit, censored and horrifically shamed when they and their loved ones were actually crime victims.
Of course I think the Alex Jones situation is designed to suppress anyone with an audience so they are intimidated out of saying anything against the narrative. However, the "left" is totally building its own gallows here. In situation after situation they are preparing laws and rules that if wielded properly will constitute their own demise. Have you seen Alex Jones speak to Del Bigtree?
I'm not going to go into what I have seen, its almost all publicly available. I don't want to be suggesting anything violent, of course. However, after what my family has been through I want certain "folks" to fund my 100% tax free life as well as financial freedom for my entire family. Just the "deprivation of rights under color of law" stuff will strip a lot of deep staters of their assets and that doesn't even begin to touch the stupid laws and rules that when the red team is in charge will be totally available to exorcise the evil from society.
I figured out a long time ago that the only way some evil things get stopped is if those doing the evil suffer from it themselves. It's habbening. How do you get "peeping Tom" government to desist spying on you? Show them that "we have it all" down to the fecal matter in their underwear. They will rip out the cameras themselves when they are hoist on their own petard.
It's mainly the vax I'm thinking of. Judges, juries…basically everyone has family and friends. When the sheer diabolical evil of what has happened is known, I think there will be gigantic lawsuits. Trump's EO is surely in play here, but also "deprivation of rights under color of law" which puts the public official's personal assets on the line. I won't be asking for fiat dollars, however. I'm talking land, houses, etc. Who pays taxes to their own killers, btw?
None of this even touches the crazy laws going into effect that the "left" is putting in place themselves. California wants to make it a crime or some such for a doctor to give "misinformation" with bad intent, as I recall. Of course it is so they can effectively outlaw stuff like a doctor recommending IVM instead of a "jab" against "COVID". However, if the state were "red" it could be used to prosecute doctors who administer vaccines knowing they cause harm, but create pharmaceutical dependents..for life. Also, what about prosecuting doctors who chemically castrate children for profit? California also wants to grab out of state children being treated for "gender issues" in California. I guess if the parents object to any aspect of "treatment". Imagine if parents CONSENTING to the castration of their children could lose custody.
Yes, and they do it to our children, too. Why so many children with "gender confusion"? Perhaps its the opposite sex DNA implanted in their brains during childhood "vaccinations" or the gender bender chemicals in just about all household products.
Yes, that seems to be the incident I was thinking of. It would appear he was getting some kind of media training.
Atrazine harms people, too.
Also, it was found that mothers who took a certain hormone during pregnancy produced daughters with a higher risk of female cancer and sons with a higher risk of homosexuality.
https://diethylstilbestrol.co.uk/gender-identity
All of those are bad. However, the one that really bothers me is the human DNA in the vaccines. All of it is really bad, but the only way a human being is supposed to get a high exposure to human DNA is a pregnant mother right before she gives birth. Her body's detection of the baby eventually is part of what produces childbirth.
So when I little boy gets a 'jab' a few hours, days or weeks after birth not only is he experiencing something he was never intended to, but there is a possibility of female DNA being embedded in his brain. Of course, its not okay for a girl, either. Does anyone think about the implications if the DNA is from a male and goes into a female? or vice versa?