Anonymous ID: f49ab4 Sept. 23, 2022, 5:43 a.m. No.17566165   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>17566152

"indisputable"

 

Anon disputes it.

 

There, your meme is retarded, lol.

 

You can't just REFERENCE USING SYMBOLS and conclude you have revealed or referred to any truth.

 

You're just engaging in low IQ rhetoric

Anonymous ID: f49ab4 Sept. 23, 2022, 6:21 a.m. No.17566314   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>17566304

ESG

 

This is the name of their latest project to harass, coerce, smear, slander and intimidate their way into implementing communist control over businesses worldwide.

 

Follow James Lindsay, he's all over this.

Anonymous ID: f49ab4 Sept. 23, 2022, 6:53 a.m. No.17566465   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6480

>>17566323

>>17566360

>>17566356

It should be thoughtfully considered:

Mike Rothschild, unlike Anon, is very 'popular' by way of visibility and by way of the implications of what is written.

 

Anon can write stupid shit and it blends in with every other Anon comment. Identity is secured.

 

MR writes what he writes, and he knows that the world knows that he wrote it. Think of the 'consequences'.

 

It doesn't make much sense to label MR's statements as 'trying to get ahead of something' when the content of what he's writing is almost exactly logically in line with reality of Q and Anons.

 

Anon believes if he was 'trying to get ahead', then there would have been DISinformation in some form in those posts.

 

It's silly to attribute 'deceit' as a motivation for true info.

 

MR is a writer, primarily. He's not a politician or in government, so logically he could not have 'weaponized' any government level power center to either 'enrich himself' or 'persecute political opposition'. Anon is not aware and seemingly the entire law enforcement establishment is unaware of any CRIMINAL activity. So why presume guilt on the basis of last name? That's precisely the logic of the very evil demonic cult MR called out.

 

Ultimately and most importantly, IF we assume intellectual honesty as motivator, isn't the content of those posts exactly what we would expect?

 

Or is no matter WHAT anyone says, if the name they were BORN WITH 'condemns' them, isn't that itself an invocation of demonic 'born guilty' logic that the accusatory logic is allegedly 'seeing' in MR's posts?

 

How far will you judge a person by their name only? This Anon puts actions above birth names.

Anonymous ID: f49ab4 Sept. 23, 2022, 7:22 a.m. No.17566585   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6611

>>17566454

 

Obviously GT's account is run by Hegelian dialectic invokers of inconsistencies 'handlers', using a peculiar definition of "safety" to push a narrative for the sake of their own power.

 

7,499,999,999 vaccinated + 1 unvaccinated = NOBODY IS SAFE!

 

7,500,000,000 vaccinated + 0 unvaccinated = EVERYONE IS SAFE!

 

Clearly, CLEARLY, when they SAY the word "safe", they don't define it the way they KNOW THEIR TARGETED RECEIVERS define it. They define that word to mean their own total control over the receivers, who are withheld that information.