>46 posts.
>
>Looks legit.
KMAO
>Heard a rumor that AJ skipped his Civil Court proceedings yesterday, and made a public comment instead.
>
>Any sauce kicking around?
Didn't anons (via Q) determine that AJ was Mossad? If so, isn't this whole Sandy Hook business just a mock trial to try and illustrate what happens if you question the narrative?
Personally, I don't buy into any of what's happened in those proceedings.
>If AJ is a ‘bad actor’, why would his Guild bring attention to ‘bad actors’?
As I mentioned, he may be being used to send a message to all us little folk 'don't question the narrative'. If all he gets is a fine, it can be paid by bigger bad actors and AJ can continue spouting half truths to half-woke anons. Are you new?