Left-Wing Group Writes Playbook For Biden’s Federal Takeover Of Elections

By: Fred Lucas September 23, 20221 of 3

There’s nothing nonpartisan about Biden’s overly broad executive order directing every federal agency to focus on voter participation.

In March 2021, President Joe Biden signed an executive order directing every federal agency to focus on voter registration and participation in what appears to be a federally-backed get-out-the-vote effort.

Don’t worry. We are assured this will be nonpartisan.

The White House came back in September 2021 to explain federal agencies will be working with “nonpartisan” groups. But the Biden administration hasn’t given many details about how this order is being implemented and who these nonpartisans are. What’s key is that the executive order almost mirrors exactly what the left-wing group Demos produced in a policy brief shortly after Biden was elected.

While other groups on the left often attempt to sound reasonable and pragmatic, Demos shows ideological leg with phrases like, “transforming America,” “rethinking capitalism,” and “global governance.” So the liberal New York think tank’s “Democracy Program” strikes one of its least-threatening tones. Don’t be fooled. It’s about weaponizing the federal government to sign up as many Democrat voters as possible.

Demos issued a report on December 3, 2020, titled, “Executive Action to Advance Democracy: What the Biden-Harris Administration and the Agencies Can Do to Build a More Inclusive Democracy.” Less than two months after taking office, Biden issued an executive order nearly identical to the Demos demands about politicizing federal agencies.

Lest there be any doubt about the organization’s influence over this administration, it’s important to know that K. Sabeel Rahman was the president of Demos and Chiraag Bains was the Demos legal strategies director when the organization issued the briefing calling for Biden’s executive actions.

So it’s no coincidence that Rahman became senior council for the Office of Management and Budget, which oversees the implementation of executive orders, as well as for the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, which oversees regulation.

Bains is the deputy director of racial justice and equity for the Domestic Policy Council — which the executive order identifies as taking the lead on the policy. A White House press release on March 5, 2021, noted that Bains — while working at Demos, “led voting rights litigation and advocacy across the country.” Two days after this press release, Biden issued the executive order.

Demos previously partnered with Project Vote, an offshoot of ACORN, and the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law to lobby the federal and state governments against what it calls “excessive Voter Identification requirements.” The coalition wanted the Motor Voter law extended beyond registering voters at the Department of Motor Vehicle offices to include offices for welfare, Medicaid, food stamps, and other areas of public assistance where perhaps Democrat voters are more likely to be. Demos criticized the Obama administration for not using the HealthCare.gov portal to sign up for Obamacare as a voting registration site.

https://thefederalist.com/2022/09/23/left-wing-group-writes-playbook-for-bidens-partisan-federal-takeover-of-elections/

>>17574532

2 of 3

The marriage of government with turning out the partisan vote — using social services as a sweetener — is a throwback to the workings of Tammany Hall, the Daley machine, and other Democrat Party traditions.

After years of advocating using the power of government to benefit a single party, Demos issued its December 2020 recommendations for the incoming Biden-Harris administration in what turned out to be the blueprint for Biden’s election agenda.

The first of the six recommendations says, “The Biden-Harris administration can make voting more accessible by directing specified federal agencies, in their administration of federal programs, to act as voter registration agencies, including providing voter registration applications, assisting clients to complete applications, and transmitting completed applications to state authorities.”

In an apparent response, Biden issued an overly broad executive order on March 7, 2021, ordering federal agencies to do exactly that.

“Agencies shall consider ways to expand citizens’ opportunities to register to vote and to obtain information about, and participate in, the electoral process,” Biden’s executive order says. “The head of each agency shall evaluate ways in which the agency can, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, promote voter registration and voter participation.”

The order also says agencies are to “expand citizens’ opportunities to register to vote and to obtain information about, and participate in, the electoral process.” The order directs agencies to focus on “distributing voter registration and vote-by-mail ballot application forms,” “assisting applicants in completing voter registration and vote-by-mail ballot application forms,” and “soliciting and facilitating approved, nonpartisan third-party organizations and state officials to provide voter registration services on agency premises.”

Demos specifically singled out using U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to sign up new voters at naturalization ceremonies.

Under Biden’s executive order, the Department of Homeland Security’s focus will be on voter registration “at the end of naturalization ceremonies for the hundreds of thousands of citizens naturalized each year,” according to the White House summary of agency plans.

The second Demos recommendation for Biden’s executive actions was to “strengthen Department of Justice’s enforcement of and guidance on voting rights statutes” and “pursue aggressive civil and criminal enforcement of federal voting rights protections.”

The Justice Department seems to have obliged, filing lawsuits against the election laws in Arizona, Georgia, and Texas, while also issuing election law guidance seemingly as a warning to other states.

Apart from the executive order, Biden appointed top Justice Department officials with a long record of opposing any voter ID laws. Biden named Vanita Gupta as the associate attorney general. She returned to the department after running the civil rights division during the Obama administration.

During that run, she oversaw the 2015 lawsuit against North Carolina to attempt to block the voter ID law there. Biden also named Kristen Clarke as the assistant attorney general, who would lead the Civil Rights Division that oversees the Voting Section. As a private lawyer, Clarke led a lawsuit to stop the then-Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp from enforcing election integrity policies.

https://thefederalist.com/2022/09/23/left-wing-group-writes-playbook-for-bidens-partisan-federal-takeover-of-elections/

>>17574549

3 of 3

The third Demos recommendation was to provide more federal resources to the Election Assistance Commission. Under this category, Demos called for the EAC to “develop standards and best practices for mail and early voting” and to “encourage ‘no-excuse’ voting by mail.”

Along those lines, the Biden executive order says agencies should provide ways to give information to people from government offices located throughout the United States as well as online and social media, “about how to register to vote, how to request a vote-by-mail ballot, and how to cast a ballot in upcoming elections,” and “ways to provide access to voter registration services and vote-by-mail ballot applications” and “distributing voter registration and vote-by-mail ballot application forms.”

The fourth Demos recommendation was: “Create an office within the White House focused on advancing the administration’s efforts to protect and strengthen democratic systems and civic participation.”

In April 2021, Biden named Justin Levitt as his senior policy adviser for democracy and voting rights. Levitt is a Loyola law professor who previously worked in the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division during the Obama administration. Levitt worked for the George Soros-funded America Coming Together PAC, and for the vote-fraud-denier group Brennan Center for Justice. In 2014, Levitt wrote a Brennan Center report opposing voter ID laws.

The fifth recommendation calls for the Biden-Harris administration to “strengthen the U.S. Postal Service’s ability to deliver election mail.”

This suggestion surrounded the left’s pre-2020 election postal conspiracy theories that Trump was somehow hijacking the postal service to get reelected.

It was not part of Biden’s executive order, but in July 2022, the USPS announced it was establishing a division to handle election mail.

The sixth Demos suggestion was to end what it calls “Prison Based Gerrymandering” by requiring the Census Bureau to count federal prisoners at their last known address rather than at the prison they are incarcerated in. The theory behind this is that when it comes time for redistricting, prisoners are from urban areas that could add majority Democrat districts but are housed in rural areas — and thus will only add non-voting residents to expand likely Republican areas.

The DOJ didn’t address “prison gerrymandering” but the executive order says the department shall, “provide educational materials related to voter registration and voting and, to the extent practicable, to facilitate voter registration, for all eligible individuals in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons.” Yet another likely Democrat constituency.

Let’s be clear, it would be problematic for a Republican president or for a president of any party to direct the federal bureaucracy to engage in elections. It’s difficult to see how the public shouldn’t suspect the party in power would want to shift things in their favor

https://thefederalist.com/2022/09/23/left-wing-group-writes-playbook-for-bidens-partisan-federal-takeover-of-elections/

Horowitz: Study shows shocking number of vaccine symptoms, yet authors applaud as safe

What is worse than promoting vaccines without human clinical trials, as our government is doing with the latest Pfizer and Moderna booster shots? Continuing to promote the old shots that already have human data confirming they are dangerous. Every week, more studies continue to hint at a magnitude of serious injury that shocks the conscience, yet the medical, scientific, and public policy establishments continue to promote them.

Saudi researchers just published a retrospective, cross-sectional study in Cureus tracking the adverse events of roughly 1,000 12- to 18-year-olds who received COVID shots between July 2021 and March 2022 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Their results demonstrate a lopsided cost-benefit analysis and hint at a cataclysmic level of injury, yet shockingly, in order to get published, they had to conclude, “Our findings might enhance public trust in the COVID-19 vaccine, which could speed up the immunization procedure.” That in itself is a political statement, not a technical funding of a study, but alas, this is the “scientific” world we now live in.

Would you trust a shot from which a majority of kids experienced at least minor symptoms and a measurable minority had to be hospitalized?

Let’s begin with the minor side effects:

Among participants who experienced COVID-19 vaccination adverse reactions (54.9%, No.= 554), 87.5% had pain at the site of injection, 84.5% reported fatigue, 69% had a headache, 67.5% had a fever, 39.7% had chills, and 19.1% had nausea and vomiting (Figure 1). Other adverse effects had been recorded by the participants such as menstrual disturbance, lymph node enlargement, muscle and bone aches, runny nose, red eye, flu, and drowsiness. Of note, 75.6% of the participants reported using medications to avoid or mitigate vaccination side effects.

Freeze frame right there. When is it normal for more than half of participants to experience flu or cold-like symptoms from a vaccine? The fact that so many experienced even minor symptoms from a novel therapeutic in itself should raise concerns about unknown long-term effects. Moreover, these are the symptoms that children would typically get anyway from COVID, and especially with Omicron, the symptoms would be no worse than those mentioned on this list – minus the menstrual disturbances.

So why should anyone risk getting the shot when it – up front – gives you the symptoms of COVID itself? This is especially poignant given that most children already got COVID and that there are questions about the shots impeding the natural immune response and ironically making one more likely to get COVID again.

There were also a couple of other important observations from the study’s results that are worth mentioning:

After adjustments, the incidence of headaches increased by about 5.6 times for those who got two shots when compared to participants who received a single dose. This indicates a dose dependency, which likely means that those getting multiple boosters, as our government continues to recommend, are going to be increasingly prone to adverse events.

https://www.conservativereview.com/horowitz-study-vaccine-symptoms-2658317934.html

>>17574616

part 2 of 2

They found a 2.4-fold increase in those reporting post-vaccination symptoms among those who already had the virus. This confirms what we have known for well over a year – that those whose systems are already primed by the virus are more prone to an inflammatory response. It was criminal from a cost-benefit analysis to administer and even mandate these shots on those with prior infection because not only did they not need to assume the risk of this novel therapy, but they were more prone to risk than anyone else.

Now let’s move on to serious side effects.

Typically, we don’t tolerate more than an infinitesimal amount of serious adverse events in order for a product to remain on the market, much less for the government to fund, endorse, distribute, and even mandate it.

About 1.265% of the people in the study sample were hospitalized, and about 4.85% needed to see a doctor. If you extrapolate for the entire U.S. population who received the vaccine, that would work out to be about 2.82 million people who needed hospitalization and over 10 million who needed to see a doctor.

These numbers harmonize with many other estimates and calculations. German insurance data seemed to show somewhere between 4% and 5% of those vaccinated were sick enough to file a medical billing claim.

Also, nearly 7% of those who experienced symptoms had lasting effects for more than five days. That’s one heck of a disruption, which might explain the labor shortages in so many fields, such as aviation. And again, this is all before we factor in doses 3-5.

So far, the new booster from Moderna has shown no greater degree of efficacy than the old concoction. In fact, Japanese researchers have now found evidence that the COVID shots cause antibody dependent disease enhancement for Omicron after several months. That is to say that even though there might be slight efficacy for a few weeks, thereafter the efficacy actually goes negative because the suboptimal antibodies are strong enough to bind to the virus but not strong enough to neutralize, thereby creating a Trojan horse effect, guiding the virus into the body’s cells. A recent study of Pfizer’s 5- to 11-year-old shot by NIH researchers showed negative efficacy after 20 weeks. So we are offering children up-front flu-like symptoms with the risk of serious injury and death in return for long-term negative efficacy against a variant that is less virulent than the flu and for a broader virus than never threatened them!

It is simply astounding how these shots were ever approved, but it is now being done with malice. Biden himself said the pandemic is over, few people get seriously ill from Omicron, and most people already got the virus. So how could the government justify rushing more shots without human trials, or worse, with studies already showing negative efficacy, ubiquitous inflammatory responses, and appallingly high levels of serious injury?

Instead of pushing to recall the shots, the study authors conclude that the findings will “enhance” public trust in the vaccine. “Only 2.3% of the included teenagers needed admission to the hospital which indicates that fewer severe side effects were reported after receiving COVID-19 immunization,” wrote the authors. Well, I guess that is fewer than the 55% who experienced more minor symptoms, but that is a lot more than in the 1 in 100,000 we would usually expect.

Then again, if they are expecting the public to assume 100% of people will drop dead, then I guess the findings are reassuring. But if they were expecting safe vaccines, the findings will bring a very different sort of clarity.

https://www.conservativereview.com/horowitz-study-vaccine-symptoms-2658317934.html

September 13, 2022

Daniel Horowitz: Do the COVID shots erase natural immunity?

1 of 2

Why is it that years into this pandemic, the cases continue to proliferate and people seem to get the virus multiple times? A new study might shed light on this question, revealing a disturbing business model of the pharmaceutical companies to ensure that their product is always in demand because it serves as the arsonist while pretending to be the medical equivalent of a firefighter.

A new study published as a letter in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that not only did the Pfizer shots turn negative after five months during the Omicron wave, making a vaccinated individual more likely to get the virus, but they actually erased the immunity provided by prior infection, thereby ensuring that injected people can get COVID again. In a one-of-a-kind observational study of over 273,000 children, the study divided the groups into four camps: unvaccinated children with prior infection, unvaccinated children with no prior infection, vaccinated children with prior infection, and vaccinated children with no prior infection. What were the results?

Shockingly, the authors conclude, “The rapid decline in protection against omicron infection that was conferred by vaccination and previous infection provides support for booster vaccination.”

Except their study should demonstrate the exact opposite conclusion. Take a look at these two figures side by side:

The figure on the left (C) shows the gradual waning of immunity among unvaccinated children with prior infection. The figure on the right shows a precipitous waning of immunity among children who got COVID but then got vaccinated. Among those infected in November 2021 in the vaccine group, their level of protection went down to zero within a half-year, even though they already had the virus!

The authors suggest this is reason to constantly get boosters, but that would only make sense if boosters offered temporary protection but retained the protection accorded from prior infection. Clearly, this data shows that it slides the protection from natural infection backward, as was previously hypothesized from other academic papers.

Then again, if you look at their first two figures (A and B), they appear to show negative efficacy after five months for those without prior infection and just a slightly slower decline into negative territory among the vaccinated children who already had prior infection. In other words, either way – previously infected or not – the vaccine makes the children worse off.

This study lends credence to the findings of an NIH paper from earlier this year showing that only 40% of people with a previous infection in the vaccinated group produced anti-nucleocapsid antibodies, compared to 93% in the placebo group. The possible inhibition of N-antibodies, which are more comprehensive than the S(spike)-antibodies, might be a possible culprit for this negative efficacy even after having already been infected with the virus… continued

https://www.conservativereview.com/horowitz-do-covid-shots-erase-natural-immunity-2658204460.html

>>17574718

Save the Children

2 of 2Follow Dan Horowitz he’s been banned from every social media, only on telegram. See the link below

Another explanation might beoriginal antigenic sin, which is the priming of the body to respond to new variants with an antigen to the old strain. A study from Stanford published in Cell earlier this year might shed light on this phenomenon. Researchers observed a decreased immune response to new variants among those vaccinated for the original strain because the shots are teaching the body to respond improperly. “We find that prior vaccination with Wuhan-Hu-1-like antigens followed by infection with Alpha or Delta variants gives rise to plasma antibody responses with apparent Wuhan-Hu-1-specific imprinting manifesting as relatively decreased responses to the variant virus epitopes, compared with unvaccinated patients infected with those variant viruses,” observed the Stanford pathologists. They note that the extent to which this causes original antigenic sin “will be an important topic of ongoing study.”

Important indeed! Just as with Pfizer’s oral therapeutic, Paxlovid, the more you use it, the more you need to use it! Behold the beauty of negative efficacy, rebounding of the virus, erasing natural immunity, and the promise of endless doses to stanch the bleeding.

Imagine that these shots are still being foisted upon children. Even the U.K. government quietly suspended the COVID shots for 5- to 11-year-olds. Yet we still have some cities in America requiring them for school.

What is further astounding is that even if the shots did work to prevent COVID, the upper bounds of illness severity most children present with is no worse than even the minor symptoms from the vaccine. Even putting aside the risk of serious injury, such as heart inflammation, the CDC’s own research shows that a massive percentage of toddlers who got the shots suffered what can only be described as flu-like symptoms.An unfathomable 50%-60% of children 6 months to two years of age experienced systemic reactions to one or both doses of either Pfizer or Moderna. This means they experienced some sort of illness beyond just pain at the injection site.

Furthermore, more than 15% of children 3-5 experienced a “health impact” from the second dose of Moderna, and anywhere from 5%-18% of children couldn’t go to school the next day, depending on the type and dose of shot.

https://www.conservativereview.com/horowitz-do-covid-shots-erase-natural-immunity-2658204460.html

>>17574731

it can't possibly be the people of Canada hate and despise this tyrant, no of course not. Well I hope the CCP and Putin ramp it up, and have success for our brother and sister anons of Canada. They need relief from Castro's rule in Canada.

>>17574781

Didn't POTUS just return to Palm Beach? I'm sure the SS has moved him to a safe place.

>>17574766

first step to normalizing canabalism

>>17574521

seriously how many millions of people in America have been sentenced to death. It came out in the studies released that many of the hot shots were intentionally sent to Red States. When to fuck is someone going to get a nuremberg trial and instant death. WHEN. All the world leaders knew it was part of their plan. I'm so tired of seeing that entire Pharma industrial complex is allowed to kill people at will, and make billions, and doctors go along with killing therapies if a patient is not vaccinnated

>>17574883

good point

Nat’l Black Farmers Assn. Pres.: We’re Losing Farmland to China that ‘We’re Never Going to Get Back’ — Biden Hasn’t ‘Done Enough to Help’

Ian Hanchett

24 Sep 202214

On Friday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends First,” National Black Farmers Association President John Boyd Jr. urged the Biden administration to stop farm foreclosures and said that when this land leaves the hands of American farmers, it ends up “in the hands of the Chinese government that we’re never going to get back. We’ve given China just about everything,” and stated that Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack hasn’t “done enough to help American farmers to get aid and relief to us here.”

Boyd said, “I’ve been pleading with the administration to stop these farm foreclosures. … And there [are] people like the Chinese government who are buying these farms. So, when this farm leaves — these lands leave American farmers’ hands, they wind up in the hands of the Chinese government that we’re never going to get back. We’ve given China just about everything, from our fuel to now, — to our land. And for those persons who are at these auctions bidding for the Chinese government, I want to tell them that it’s very un-American to do so. So, we have a lot of problems here and the President hasn’t [come] and honored his commitment to meet with me, but I know he’s met with other leaders here recently at the White House, but excluded me from that meeting. So, we have the Secretary of Agriculture, who hasn’t helped — done enough to help American farmers to get aid and relief to us here. But we have all this aid for all of these other regions of the world.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/09/24/natl-black-farmers-assn-pres-were-losing-farmland-to-china-that-were-never-going-to-get-back-biden-hasnt-done-enough-to-help/

Nat’l Black Farmers Assn. Pres.: We’re Losing Farmland to China that ‘We’re Never Going to Get Back’ — Biden Hasn’t ‘Done Enough to Help’

Ian Hanchett

24 Sep 202214

On Friday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends First,” National Black Farmers Association President John Boyd Jr. urged the Biden administration to stop farm foreclosures and said that when this land leaves the hands of American farmers, it ends up “in the hands of the Chinese government that we’re never going to get back. We’ve given China just about everything,” and stated that Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack hasn’t “done enough to help American farmers to get aid and relief to us here.”

Boyd said, “I’ve been pleading with the administration to stop these farm foreclosures. … And there [are] people like the Chinese government who are buying these farms. So, when this farm leaves — these lands leave American farmers’ hands, they wind up in the hands of the Chinese government that we’re never going to get back. We’ve given China just about everything, from our fuel to now, — to our land. And for those persons who are at these auctions bidding for the Chinese government, I want to tell them that it’s very un-American to do so. So, we have a lot of problems here and the President hasn’t [come] and honored his commitment to meet with me, but I know he’s met with other leaders here recently at the White House, but excluded me from that meeting. So, we have the Secretary of Agriculture, who hasn’t helped — done enough to help American farmers to get aid and relief to us here. But we have all this aid for all of these other regions of the world.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/09/24/natl-black-farmers-assn-pres-were-losing-farmland-to-china-that-were-never-going-to-get-back-biden-hasnt-done-enough-to-help/