>>1757563 (previous bread)
>We also have Eric Schmidt setting up a PRIVATE NETWORK in NK. Which seems to me was going to be used by the bad actors for secure comms. Maybe they had some sort of secure VPN system they were going to use? Need a secure networking fag here.
I think that NK brought a huge amount of physical seperation not only in the networking, compute and storage aspects, but in the management and control. Consider how the military runs their networks….complete physical seperation above layer 2 with DMZs or whatever that would be called these days for any connectivity to the public internet (they may even be running their own peering, but have never seen any confirmation or indication of this). More importantly any ATT or Verizon or whichever company employee that is potentially working on a military network will be heavily vetted.
A network org in NK would be perfect. ES would have complete control over any westerners working the network and the danger of a local coopting the system is almost zero in NK (in my opinion).
The most important aspects of any secure network is the encryption of the comms and security of an storage facility. The physical security aspect strikes me as much easier to achieve in NK than in any normal country.