>>17581663 pb
>just learning to lip read,
she has a foreign accent, probably german
"how old are you? are these nice?"
>>17582352
why do you hate yourself, gary? after all, you're a boomer, too, and don't bother to deny it.
btw, FILTERED.
obviously it's not working. so at least ya got that much goin' for ya…
>in 1949 hollywood was not woke
careful… the "oldfags" around here have convinced themselves that john wayne took it up the ass so he could be a movie star.
you're gonna start a slide, at best, and at worst, likely suffer endless ad hominem attacks for disputing one of their favorite delusions.
>point taken
point missed entirely. i was agreeing with you. hollywood was NOT woke in 1949. it was slowly subverted. hard to say when it started, but it was definitely more autonomous then, even into the sixties and maybe seventies.
one death is a tragedy
50 million deaths is a statistic
either/both are exploited for their propaganda value.
>Maybe if we didn't have prohibition, capone like cartels wouldn't be enriched…
>End the war on drugs. End the incentives. End the violence. Police go after crimes with victims. Liberty wins.
>Look at alcohol. Look at cannabis.
agree 100%, but listen to DJT rant about death penalty for drug dealers, and how many trumptards are going to go along?
another thing, back then we didn't have a MSM monopoly exploiting every dead alky and mob execution as a "beer related murder."
>>17582697 (me)
btw, if you've never seen it, watch an old cagney/bogie movie called "The Roaring Twenties." the author introduces the film discussing his long research into how prohibition CREATED the mafia and INCREASED alcohol consumption.
ah… the spin doctors and trump apologists are here. goodie.
>73% of white people have self segregated from the black African negroid community entity and don't associate with any black people period.
i'd say it's the blacks that have self segregated from whites as much as the reverse. besides that, all the well-dressed well-behaved well-spoken blacks in commercials cannot wipe out the nightly news, where almost exclusively blacks appear as the stars of the latest "reality" crime dramas.
i grew up in an integrated northern suburb a long time ago, and had a few black friends in jr and sr high. there were some dangerous blacks, but there were also dangerous whites.
i've since moved to a very rural area, there are almost no blacks even in the largest town in the county, and most whites in the boonies agressively hate blacks, even tho some will admit they've never met one.
one thing i've come to realize, it's just about impossible to change anyone's opinions on race once they're an adult.
>Will check it out ty
the fictional story has major chapters, and the author inserts additional documentary style blurbs between them.
you can stream it on YT for $$. if you belong to netflix they have a DVD they will mail to you.
i won't give bezos a penny, so i can't say if it's on prime. prolly is, but….
>stonk crash
so riddle me this… why are precious metals continuing on the steady slide that started 4-5 months ago?
TYA
found a trailer for the movie that features a bit of commentary by the author, mark hellinger.
>The Mafia (Cosa Nostra) came to Palermo, Sicily, or at least grew in power there, 1860s or so.
oh, thanks, i didn't know that (SARCASM). prohibition changed a small time protection racket limited to NYC and a few other cities with large immigrant population, into a nationwide criminal empire that made more money in an hour than all the penny ante street thugs combined in a year.
go be a pretentious ass somewhere else, K?
>that wouldn't prove anything
as a prof for 45 yrs, i can say with some certainty, you can explain it to them, but you can't understand it for them.
i AM the sauce. parents lived it. heard the stories all my life.
>I used to think legalizing everything was the way
that's the POINT… they HAVEN'T decriminalized it, they've merely re-regulated it. if you look at countries that HAVE completely decriminalized drugs, the evidence is clear and unambiguous. crime instantly falls to near zero, and drug USE drops, even when the gov't gives it away free.
well, it varies by discipline and by school, but you don't really want to know, you're just being an ass.
>lay them to rest.
without know what those are, how can i lay them to rest? as i said, it varies, greatly, by discipline and by school. i could only speak to a narrow range of disciplines, and a limited number of schools.
sure… i'll be over here. happy?
i may have to report you for posting threats of violence.
>this has been a data retrieval operation.
that and a destroy the EU economy mission
plus a deplete the NATO mil inventory mission
and a turn the pepes against the US mission
and it's going brilliantly, i might add….
never play chess with a russian.
not gonna fret over it. so if an anon posts "sauce" how many others actually verify it? it's just a ritual. i for one do NOT believe shit posted here just because it has "sauce." only a gullible fool believes something because it has "sauce." so why would i bother? when i post something, you can take it or leave it. believe what you will, and just STFU about it. no one cares what the self-appointed hall monitors say.
ask your questions. i will answer them.
in a physical science, one begins with a certain amount of required course work. the required courses will span the sub-disciplines of the science. the number of courses and credits varies GREATLY from school to school, and discipline to discipline. while doing this course work, the grad student will be required to teach undergraduate labs and recitations. after about the first year, a student will be expected to find an advisor. this involves interviews with the dept faculty, until the student finds an advisor they would like to work for, who is willing to accept that student as an advisee. teaching undergrads beyond the minimum requirement is optional. once a student finds an advisor, they begin working for them as a lab monkey, all the while completing the required course work, and taking additional courses in one or more areas of specialization. eventually, most all of the time is spent as a lab monkey for the advisor. at around 2 to 2.5 yrs, the student will have to select a committee of other faculty from the dept, and present to them a comprhensive report of their lab work, and answer general questions in an oral exam. this may be called a comprehensive, or some other name may be given to it. if unanimously approved by the panel of faculty, work for the advisor continues. bright students will get some additional duties helping with the preparation of manuscripts for publication in peer review journals. there will be other requirements specific to each individual advisor, such as participating in problem solving sessions, and taking turns preparing problem sets for those sessions. if the advisor is tapped to teach an undergrad course, their grad students get the burden of grading the collected assignments given to the undergrads, as well as their tests. there may be meetings where recent literature is reviewed and discussed. all in all, students will be expected to put in 70-90 hrs per week, for usually about 4.5 to 5 yrs. at some point, the advisor will say, ok, your lab work is done. at this point, the student may be required to submit a "proposal" for an original research topic that is totally unrelated to the specific research that the student did for his advisor. the same committee will review the proposal, and the student will have to defend the ideas in an oral exam. then the student will begin preparation of their doctoral dissertation, which is a comprehensive and detailed description of their entire body of research, including an introduction and section on background and significance, the details of all experiments, a discussion of the results, and conclusions about the meaning of those results in the context of extant theory. this will also have to be defended in an oral exam before a committee of faculty. if it is unanimously approved, the student receives a PhD.
happy now?
what a great joke on me. you must be SO much more intelligent, or cool, or whatever floats your tiny little flaccid boat.
btw, it was a reply to another anon, and NO ONE CARES what you think, or what you did or didn't do. deal with it. eunuch.
>several "made" small fortunes on friday betting against the currency
TRANSLATION: several STOLE fortunes from the average working-class people. money doesn't just appear. it someone gets a big pile of it, someone else LOST a big pile of it.
PUT AN END TO SPECULATION (BETTING) AND PUT SPECULATORS TO DEATH (after seizing all their assets).
>The truth about child slavery and torture is not going to put people in the hospital
totally agree.
>I wonder just how much worse the truth could possibly be
just spitballin' here…
aliens?
demons?
only two i can come up with
>Seems like very systematic destruction but not against 'the old guard'
trust the plan
soon™
but don't dare say this place is a pacification op
>There actually are no aliens.
idiot alert!
how could you POSSIBLY know that?
you can't know what doesn't exist unless you know everything.
PS - YOU DON'T!
fuck off, shill. no one was talking to you.
i may or may not be angry. YOU have no way of knowing that. on the other hand, EVERYONE can see what a colossal ASS you are.
truth is, i was just killing time here waiting for disk utility to overwrite a HD with zeros. it just finished, so you overpaid underworked shills will have to jerk each other off without me.
pls eat shit and die. don't let the coffin lid hit you on the ass on your way to Hell.
your shillfu is weak, young cockroach…
get up and grow real. your mother feels bad for you.
kek… i'm off to bed, now. may the forks be with y'all.
>After 30 years of harping on this shit, one becomes jaded a bit. This is why so many of us "BOOMERS" are excited about Q. WE've been screaming this shit for decades.
oh oh… now you've gone and insulted the ijits that call themselves "oldfags," as if they invented seeing thru the tissue of lies and digging for the truth.
i remember where I WAS when jack ruby shot lee harvey oswald (the exclamation point on the gov't assassination). how many "anons" can say the same?
just tired of precocious children.