The World Health Organization website:
Female genital mutilation (FMG) is declared a world wide issue, complete with horrible statistics with and measures to take to prevent the mutilation:
"Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a traditional harmful practice that involves the partial or total removal of external female genitalia or other injury to female genital organs for non-medical reasons.
It is estimated that more than 200 million girls and women alive today have undergone female genital mutilation in the countries where the practice is concentrated. In addition, every year, an estimated 3 million girls are at risk of undergoing female genital mutilation, the majority of whom are cut before they turn 15 years old."
https://www.who.int/health-topics/female-genital-mutilation#tab=tab_1
And yet, the WHO promotes 'gender inequality' as another world wide problem:
"Gender inequality and discrimination faced by women and girls puts their health and well-being at risk. Women and girls often face greater barriers than men and boys to accessing health information and services. These barriers include restrictions on mobility; lack of access to decision-making power; lower literacy rates; discriminatory attitudes of communities and healthcare providers; and lack of training and awareness amongst healthcare providers and health systems of the specific health needs and challenges of women and girls.
Consequently, women and girls face greater risks of unintended pregnancies, sexually transmitted infections including HIV, cervical cancer, malnutrition, lower vision, respiratory infections, malnutrition and elder abuse, amongst others. Women and girls also face unacceptably high levels of violence rooted in gender inequality and are at grave risk of harmful practices such as female genital mutilation, and child, early and forced marriage."
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender#tab=tab_1
United Nations:
The rhetorical question that needs to be raised here is whether the consistent elements of gender socialization in the region, and the confusing messages for both sexes, can only lead to entrenching processes of gender inequality. At the very least, it is safe to argue that gender socialization, combined with the continuing discrepancies in education opportunities and outcomes not only provide a negative feedback loop, but effectively contribute to entrenching patriarchal norms.
https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/education-pathway-towards-gender-equality
So if I'm a girl and have gender issues, I'm at greater risk for female genital mutilation. But if I have my breasts cut off, get put on puberty blockers and have a penis somehow show up, I'm not at "grave risk" of harmful practices, I'm achieving gender parity? And regardless of my sex, I'm told as a child that I can be a boy and my brother can be a girl, but that isn't a confusing message? Where TF are the adults in the room?