Tyb
Sounds like a personal problem Anon.
You should get that looked at by a medical health professional.
How about you make your own TL;DR with a nice cup of STFU.
The logic of the dialectical faith requires roleplayers who decide for everyone else the definitions of and 'sincerity' in the use of words.
Your code is a loop of inconsistency.
Replace "anti-jew" with "anti-gay" in this meme and it explains your garbage approach to discourse with the world and other people.
Listen to my conflicts, and if you do not agree than I will label you as being the conflict I myself am invoking.
Fix your broken brain, homeslice.
You're just pissed off because this particular gay person SPOKE in ways that contradict the satanic cult's obsession with needing to hide themselves behind 'LGBT' and using gay people as human shields.
Because this particular gay person uttered 'wrongthink', you attack the person in order to DEFLECT from the message.
Child grooming without parental consent. Imagine teachers evangelizing or baptizing children without parent's consent. What do you think the uproar would be?
Tick tock, demon protector.
You are not required to explicitly state your identity before you are labelled with one, according to your own inconsistent logic of labeling others without their explicit statement of identity, you stupid filthy contradicting clown.
Why is big tech and fake news msm censoring this?
You are not required to be 'shown' anything to prove the label that was given to you, you stupid contradicting clown.
Show any Anon where they said they identify as any of the labels you're spewing out in your panic stricken meltdown.
"show me where I said", NOT REQUIRED by your own garbage labelling logic pre-self-identified.
You're TRIGGERED about the narrative of 'gays against grooming', because it makes it more difficult for satanic pedophiles to hide behind 'LGBT' label to invoke the lie that anti-pedo iS AsSoCiATeD WiTh anti-LGBT.
The more gays say they are against what the cult is doing to children, the more difficult it is for the cult to use LGBT as human shields/protection.
Anon need not "show" you saying anything other than referencing what it is you are saying, and Anon can see and know why you are saying what it is you are saying by merely referencing YOUR own garbage logic of label abject other regardless of what they said they are.
"Gays Against Grooming" is attacked because it makes it more difficult for pedophiles to hide themselves behind 'LGBT' 'protected class' labelling.
Pedos can run but they can't hide.
Cry moar
So you're saying you know very little about what is going outside your country, or are you posturing yourself pre-engagement as being more informed than most here?
Shillax, bro.
Now you're just trying to redefine 'woke'.
Woke is faith in the dialectical religion as 'interpreted' by the very cult getting exposed that you're cringe trying to protect.
"Woke" doesn't have a monopoly or exclusive ownership rights on gay people you dumbass.
"Everything woke turns to shit" has no bearing on whether a person is straight or gay. It is a reference to Gnostic cult implementations of speech authorities and directors attacking human relations.
Cringe mockery of what you have no control over, kek.
FYI Anon included "OR" for a reason.
So you are you posturing yourself pre-engagement as being more informed than most here?
They would have impeached him and charged him with 'crimes against humanity' for daring to question tHe OnLy PoSSibLe solution.
He would have been forced to leave WH, and the Plan would have failed.
So, he HAD to say HCQ was a cure first, then, over time, announce updates on the vaccine development and to field questions about them, making sure not to speak negatively of them lest it trigger another impeachment.
Trump did not "push" the jab, he said he was ALWAYS AGAINST MANDATES.
You are projecting the cult's "pushing" onto Trump.
No to your No.
>the only things anons know is what is bought on this board and social media
This is not correct.
The only things that Anons know are what they in fact know, not labeled as such from other Anons who make ridiculous statements like "only what is posed here and from social media"
There are books, newspaper articles, people's DISCUSSIONS, that 'this board and social media' do not have a monopoly over.
One of the most remarkable statements in FBI agent Stephen Friend’s whistleblower complaint is that the bureau is using field agents to certify affidavits for searches and arrests when they weren’t doing the investigating. If true, such a tactic would mislead the courts.
This is the 'division source code hidden in the NWO matrix.
https://justthenews.com/accountability/whistleblowers/fbi-whistleblower-says-swat-teams-being-misused-j6-defendants-rights
>I was using the previous posters verbiage- “push the jab"
That Anon was also using a previous posters verbiage.
Or, you can take responsibility for your statements that you declared from yourself, regardless of where you first see it.
It's an ideological/informational oath at its root, and since it applied from birth to death it needed to kept 'hidden' within 'select' bloodlines as the materialist 'driver' of the cult's dialectical faith.
"Follow the bloodlines" is informationally correlated with "follow the money" is informationally correlated with "follow the command and control" is informationally consistent with "follow the information" is informationally consistent with "follow the information" is informationally consistent with "follow the information" is…
Adding a bit more, this Anon adds it to the total of all information as well.
"Information" is "Spirit", logico-syntactically.
"It's an ideological/informational oath" = "It's a spiritual oath" = "It's a dialectical faith cult"
KNOWING introductions of dialectic opposites, a view of ontological reality as subject to an alchemy process believing it can change the underlying reality of the world using their own invoked conflicts that they believe are retained yet negated by the 'test results' from the public (Hegel's "Aufheben").
The view that all reality is inherently divided is a psychological projection of a self perceiving itself as intolerably divided from, i.e. not experiencing, "the totality". Megalomania on a grand and cosmic scale.
The NWO cult's faith is their own arrogated self-presentation as gods knowing the totality as it is experiencing itself (through their minds as the link).
The more death and destruction that they can invoke 'materially', the more 'history progresses' (as if it wouldn't otherwise?) towards no conflict.
"If we keep attacking what does not bend to our Critical Theory, we will break it."
Communist logic is at root treating not just adult controlled institutions and organizations as laboratories for 'change', but to treat HUMAN BODIES, OF ALL AGES, as laboratories for alchemical 'transformation'.
All dissent crushed as 'going against history' (I.e. Their ideological control over the underlying information, the underlying spirit).
>What is it that you believe Q promised to do exactly?
CTRL-F "promise" in the Q drops.
The TRUE answer to your question can be answered by the source identified as making promises.
>Q hasn’t upheld their end of the bargain.
What are you claiming consists of 'Q's end of the bargain'?
Cite the Q drop(s), please and thanks.
>Q never once said that Q would do anything
False. There are hundreds of not thousands of references to what Q team has been up to, as can be read in the OSINT drops.
This Anon is asking a legit question.
But you know the cult is going to try to take control over the definition of "mutual".
If patriot militias and MS-13 shoot at each other, you know the cult is not going to use 'mutual combat' narrative, their narrative would imply a logic of non-reciprocality and hierarchy instead.
>Nothing from Q promising to do anything.
False. CTRL-F "promise" in the Q drops.
Q never said it was ALL 'up to the people'.
The Q team is not negating itself.
You're going to have to try harder, shill.
The cult's plan was supposed to include "Blame Russia for cyber attack on US "Intelligence Community" networks", with pretext of ORIG release of the data FROM Russia?
Was to be part of WW3?