Anonymous ID: 83ab4b Sept. 29, 2022, 11:39 a.m. No.17603983   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3995

>>17603971

Just was reading it too. listen to these OLD, SICK, EVIL, STUPID fucks. they did not want to give trump an opportunity to defend himself.

 

"She didn’t want the Judiciary panel to interview witnesses at all," the book's authors wrote. "Pelosi simply didn’t trust the panel — which was stacked with liberal crusaders and hotheaded conservatives — to handle the rollout of the complex Ukraine narrative with the careful, compelling treatment it required. She couldn’t afford another Nadler screwup. The Judiciary chairman could focus on the legal business of crafting the articles of impeachment and have academics testify, she allowed. But that was it."

 

Nadler's frustration with the pair of Democrats grew. Research conducted by his team proved that presidents facing impeachment from Congress had been allowed to defend themselves before the House Judiciary Committee, with attorneys for the president having the opportunity to attend hearings as well as cross-examine testifying witnesses or call their own.

 

That did not matter to Schiff, the authors wrote, and the fact that Trump would not be able to face his accusers before being impeached did not sit right with Nadler, who warned Pelosi and Schiff of the ramifications it would have in the long run.

 

"If we’re going to impeach, we need to show the country that we gave the president ample opportunity to defend himself," Nadler told them, according to the book.

Anonymous ID: 83ab4b Sept. 29, 2022, 11:43 a.m. No.17604001   🗄️.is 🔗kun

During a meeting highlighted in the book, Pelosi played a clip of conservative commentator Judge Andrew Napolitano and insisted his words could be used to better sell the notion of impeachment to Republicans.

 

"We need to play up Napolitano saying he committed impeachable offenses," Pelosi allegedly declared. "The public awareness on the details of this is very low … So we need clarity and repetition over and over again. ‘National security threat.’ ‘Abuse of power.’ ‘No one is above the law.’"

 

 

Them setting the narrative lol.

Anonymous ID: 83ab4b Sept. 29, 2022, 11:45 a.m. No.17604012   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4024

>>17603995

at least one, and his aides were. The real issue is the aides not coming forward as whistleblowers and saying this is illegal. Such spineless traitors keep the cycle of complacency going.