>RWell, I think I found a great source on Rachel Brand

https://grondamorin.com/2017/06/17/the-presidents-legal-problems-have-created-a-storm-in-the-halls-of-the-department-of-justice/

honestly, up til now I would have said she was compromised. Not so any longer. This is a good read on her (obvi written by a NeverTrumper but whatever)

From Iowa (so is Grassley)

Harvard (knows the deal)

they LET her say she resigned. But they asked her to leave.

My guess…SupCourt…wassup

plus she only really smiles BIGLY with the dormouse.eposting

>>1760563

>>1760602

lots of high profile people say Q is a larp….they have their job, we have ours. seriously lame when jacks from here try to hit personalities up with Q and expect something. FAKE AND GAY

>>1760703

yeah we live in a "brand" economy. figures have audiences and brands. whomever "falls" into this movement over time, great. otherwise, they likely do more good with their own brand. it's a really big pool with lots of room.