>POLITICO ARE'ELECTION DENIERS'
< 'illegal sham referendum'
notable
It's ok to question elections now
>POLITICO ARE'ELECTION DENIERS'
< 'illegal sham referendum'
notable
It's ok to question elections now
>It's ok to question elections now
> they couldn't stop themselves from editorializing in mid-statement. They must not have an editor. Or they're so biased they don't care about the facts
would add this to notable
as clearly the Kremlin Spokesman didn't call them sham referendums but Politico said he did
>notable
https://archive.ph/z8vZq#selection-1955.112-1955.191
>POLITICO ARE 'ELECTION DENIERS'
>hey couldn't stop themselves from editorializing in mid-statement.
> but Politico said he did
muh 4am talking points
Potato gets 81 gorillion votes
<"real"
ethnic russian territories getting genocided by nazis for 8 years vote to join Russian liberators
"fake"
> preview of our full story on years' worth of documented ties between David Leavitt and David Hamblin
NOTABLE
>Zelenskyy could have just protected his own people in the East,
only problem with that theory is he had no control over the Nazis
#RichardMedhurst
SHOCKING Video from 2019 ShowsZelensky Not In Control of Ukraine
113,668 views
Apr 6, 2022
baker
POLITICO ARE 'ELECTION DENIERS'. they couldn't stop themselves from editorializing in mid-statement.
Fake News Denying elections