I don't think the extra line on the bottom is needed, anon.
In any case, you blew my mind. It actually makes some kind of perverse sense.
Die, Disney, Die!
Is that really a free speech issue? Is loitering okay under the Constitution?
I'll bet that 90% of bylaws are against the Constitution.
>Wait, the FBI actually did its job?
Maybe but it could also be entrapment which is what the FIB does best.
>"Loitering" is defined as being somewhere, "without purpose".
How can they prove in court that someone is without purpose? Murky.
>there are no good guys fighting bad guys.
So everybody is a bad guy, including Q? That's a conspiracy theory.
>Why is 60% of what's going on to be kept secret and only 40% revealed?
It was never 60/40. It was 40/60 but Q changed it to 20/80.
20% hidden, 80% revealed. Sounds fine to me.
Dictionary definitions for "permitted":
1) allowed or tolerated
2) given permission to do something; authorized
So it depends on which of the two definitions the court uses.
Love that car. My dad had one. I would watch the the tail fins from the back seat. Pretty cool.
Humans will be looking for ways to trip up the bot, both physically and linguistically.
It better stay very very far away from niggers, kek.
>Why show everyone everything and risk the children seeing this and destroying what remains of innocence…
For the children. That is very likely what Q's concern was.
Everything is a phallic symbol. We have not progressed much beyond pagan religion.