https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2022/10/02/savage-fbi-draft-letter-firing-peter-strzok-is-revealed-n636064
Peter was fired with a 'savage letter' (well the draft is said, by an article linked from Brietbart, to be 'savage'
excuse me, it was a Redstate article
curious all of that, isn't it.
one supposition is that the very people who want to out all the haters post that crap so that they can see who agrees with it.
ignoring it here is OK.
don't ignore it in public. If you see it in the market or at the factory, that kind of hate, then you can make fuss.
here if you fuss about it, that's like raving at the graffiti on a wall.
give us a link with a write up on it.
I was not asking for you to do the write-up.
vigilantism isn't to be encouraged!
too often they get it all wrong, and the wrong people end up dead. Or they are given bad information and lead to believe that someone did something and then they go after them, with that point of view 'this is the right thing to do', but it is not the correct thing.
the correct thing is to have Justice and courts and due process.
even in wartime there are rules.
for example the brag boasters who post images of 'enemy soldiers' being fed to a pig, those people need to be brought up as war criminals.
we live in a world of laws, not of vigilantes doing their evil enforcing out side the law.
some may be.
many are not.
the few, like Storck and that type, make it seem as though they are all that way.
the vigilantism becomes a worse problem because of the point you make, that many who are supposed to uphold the law do not do it fairly or justly.
that makes it all the more important to say it out loud, because of the rot from within:
vigilantism is always wrong! always.
where are you getting this information?
or is it just an incantation of fowl conjecture?
please provide sauce
fair question: if the over-theres , shivering,conclude that the overheres, who stole the last one (the last-one what? you know) did a bad bad thing in the Baltic Sea last week . . .
what happens then?
if the case can be shown that the 'handers' got that accomplished with their senile puppet . . . cheering it on (about which he seemed to have bragged and boasted . . .
if that can be shown, and 'under rule of law' what happens next?