ANONS CHECK THIS OUT!!

>>1762109

When did we first discover the obummer picture? was it technically last night?

SEE THIS: >>1762098

>>1762115

Thanks.. will see if anons care

>>1762147

The image could have been taken whenever. The 20th is when the person posted it to instagram

>>1762098

FUCK, didnt think I would have to spell it out..

FUCKING Q Mentions OPENLY SHOWCASING THEIR SYMBOLISM.. Some fucking obummer lacky gets to take a pic because it was in the open..

Q Mentions CHICAGO!! What the fuck is on the jacket of the guy next to Obamma?

CHICAGO

THEN Q mentions 'scandal free'

WITH THE FUCKING QUOTES AROUND SCANDAL FREE..

Search the comment of the picture WITH QUOTES and you get? FUCKING NO SCANDALS!

Shit anons activate those almonds..

>>1762253

FUCK ITS NOT AT THE INAUG!!!!!! THE PHOTO WAS JUST POSTED THEN!!! THE PHOTO COULD HAVE BEEN TAKEN ANYTIME PRIOR THE LAST 8 FUCKING YEARS!!!

>>1762248

>>1762269

Sorry, just frustrated people think this photo was taken on January 20th…

And noone seems to care that Q pretty much described this picture on DEC 14th..

But whatever IM out.

>>1762302

I dont give a shit about credit faggot. I want anons to realize Q described this photo on DEC 14th..

To show im not a shill trying to slide this will be my last post in this bread.