>>17623676 Reminder: EcoHealth Alliance (AKA Wildlife Trust) has rec'd over $69 Million dollars from the USG including 2 Small Business Administration loans for over $750k each AND a 2021 Dept. of Defense Grant for $5 Million for "CRIMEAN-CONGO HEMORRHAGIC FEVER: REDUCING AN EMERGING HEALTH THREAT IN TANZANIA." Of the total EcoHealth rec'd over $24 Million in 2021.

Gotta feeling we could look at their grants and figgur out what the next plandemic will be.

For shits and grins, threw Wildlife Trust into the spending database. Looked at one listed from 2002, had an end date of 2012, was let by the HHS and stated purposed was THE ECOLOGY, EMERGENCE AND PANDEMIC POTENTIAL OF NIPAH VIRUS IN BANGLADESH.

Wildlife Trust: https://www.usaspending.gov/keyword_search/%22Wildlife%20Trust%22

EcoHealth: https://www.usaspending.gov/keyword_search/%22EcoHealth%20Alliance%22

>>17624047 (me)

>EcoHealth Alliance

Daszak gets ~$90k in 2019 from 'related organizations'?

IRS tax exempt database for EcoHealth Alliance 2020 Form-990: https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/311726494_202006_990_2021052018156328.pdf

>>17624119 (me)

Related organization is Wildlife Trust International which, according to the IRS rec'd < $50k for the same reporting period.

hmmm.

https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/detailsPage?ein=231996716&name=Wildlife%20Preservation%20Trust%20International&city=New%20York&state=NY&countryAbbr=US&dba=&type=CHARITIES,%20DETERMINATIONLETTERS,%20EPOSTCARD,%20REVOCATION,%20&orgTags=CHARITIES&orgTags=DETERMINATIONLETTERS&orgTags=EPOSTCARD&orgTags=REVOCATION

>>17624119 (me)

Daszak in the Dept. of State FOIA reading room (document 2 of 5)

"NIH-Supported Research Revises SARS Origin Story

1. (U) NIH was a major funder, along with the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), of SARS research by the Wuhan Institute of Virology's Shi Zhengli and Cui Jie. The researchers spent five years of investigation and genome sequencing to show that a population of bats in a cave in Yunnan Province harbored a virus with all the "building blocks" of SARS. This lends weight to the theory that SARS originated in bat populations before jumping first to civet cats (likely via bat feces) and then to humans, after people transported the civet cats from Yunnan to Guangdong Province animal markets. The results were published late last year in Nature and other publications. Shi said that U.S. scientist Peter Daszak, a leading expert on emerging diseases and president of the New York-based EcoHealth Alliance, was a "strong partner."Daszak's team has provided support in statistical modeling to assess the risk of more coronaviruses like SARS crossing over to human populations.

Looks very much like a wrap up smear.

https://foia.state.gov/search/Results.aspx?searchText=Daszak&beginDate=&endDate=&publishedBeginDate=&publishedEndDate=&caseNumber=