>That makes no sense when you think about it.
Never heard of books?
>It doesn't, I expect it to do worse, that's why that shit takes so long and will not work.
You expect it to outperform humans, to be "real" is my point.
>…the taxi driver analogy…
But AIs are specialized. We can just add those features.
If a human has no knowledge of the smoke, and no prior knowledge about how to handle smoke or even an indication that smoke is something to take note of. Why would you expect them to call the cops. Same with AI.
>The world is chaotic all the time.
Exactly. And normies are not handling it well.
>I'm actually a software developer
You too? Welcome to the club
if(flex.Failed()) { SlinkToTheCorner(); }
>Are you a bot? It seems you can't think like a human. My point was obvious.
Are you?
You point was obvious to you. And I think I know what it was, but I want you to spell it out. Because if it is what I think it is an invalid point.
>I'm not my parents
And likewise the computer is not the programmer.
>and I choose what to do. No one else.
And how do you go about choosing that?
By the programming instilled in you by your parents and caretakers?
>That was actually me and the problem with your shitty "machine learning" crap.
"my" crap. We are arguing logic, I'm no fan of AI or machine learning.
>Tell me, why would you expect a company like Google to manage to create remote driven cars
I don't.
>Can't you give your "AI" all RFCs and let it create the perfect error free web browser?
No. Again, faulty logic. Humans aren't error free, why does the AI have to be to be a "real" AI?
<don't look at my post count, it's still me. I'm cycling vpns to avoid timouts.