Anonymous ID: fcaaff Oct. 3, 2022, 4:46 p.m. No.17627348   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7453 >>7581 >>7728 >>7804 >>7891 >>7929 >>8048

pb

 

>>17626652

We’ve been told about this over and over again, because they cheat I won’t vote, butwe have to overwhelm them, don’t be pussies!

 

Vote this time its a command. It’s not a choice, if you are real anons. If your belief is that your vote doesnt count, then you are not committed to America.

 

Go and fucking vote this one time, see how it turns out. Never be a loser before you are a loser. Stop using cute pepe memes to justify your laziness.

 

All patriotic anons, even if you’ve never voted before this is the first time in history you have God and country loving Maga candidates waiting for your help. For that reason alone, vote!

 

Gregg Phillips said when anons say they are not going to vote, shun them! There’s too much at stake, for people not spend an hour going to vote.

 

There is no reason why a red blooded loyal American wouldn’t vote, so you should question this bullshit and justification of the cowards and lazy Americans (if they are citizens).

 

Vote and let God and the universe do its thing.

Anonymous ID: fcaaff Oct. 3, 2022, 5:31 p.m. No.17627606   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7656

>>17627453

Yeah right. Have some bravery and patriotism regardless of how you think it will turn out. You think the original patriots said that? We didnt win before so I’ll go home. Honestly this is a pathetic statement.

 

1 hour dude to do your civic duty, go and fucking vote. You have no principles, you want to just say you are. Overwhelm them, do something different

Anonymous ID: fcaaff Oct. 3, 2022, 5:38 p.m. No.17627643   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7962 >>8048

3 Oct, 2022 22:12

Former Russian president comments on Musk’s Ukraine proposal

Dmitry Medvedev joked the tycoon was a secret Russian agent who blew his own cover

 

After Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky and Kiev’s online troll army savaged Elon Musk’s proposal for ending the conflict with Russia, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev jokingly called the Tesla and SpaceX founder a “shadowy agent” of the Kremlin, comparing him to Stierlitz, the legendary fictional Soviet spy.

 

“Kudos to [Elon Musk]! However, the shadowy agent has lost the cover. Deserves a new rank, fast. His next tweet will run like, Ukraine is an artificial state. Anticipating…” Medvedev tweeted, in English, on Monday evening.

 

On his Telegram channel, in Russian, instead of “shadowy agent” the former president calledMusk “Eustace” – a reference to the code name of the main character in the Soviet-era series ‘17 Moments of Spring,’ better known under his German alias Otto von Stierlitz.

 

Both references were clearly tongue-in-cheek and poked fun not at Musk, but at the utter hysterics of the Ukrainian government and its online influencers over the American billionaire’s earnest peace proposal.

 

Crimea would remain Russian and have its water supply guaranteed, Ukraine would declare neutrality, and the four regions that just joined Russia hold UN-supervised referendums on their fate, Musk suggested earlier in the day. The poll was quickly swamped by what he called the “biggest bot attack I’ve ever seen.”

 

It wasn’t just Kiev’s info-warriors and their Western NAFO backers, however. Ukraine’s departing ambassador to Germany used some very un-diplomatic language, while President Vladimir Zelensky himself launched a pollasking his followers if they preferred Musk who supported Ukraine over this one, who “supports Russia.”

 

Early on in the conflict, Musk sent hundreds of SpaceX’s Starlink satellites and terminals to Ukraine. Though their stated purpose was humanitarian, Kiev has since admitted to using them for the war effort.

 

Russia sent troops into Ukraine on February 24, citing Kiev’s failure to implement the Minsk agreements, designed to give the regions of Donetsk and Lugansk special status within the Ukrainian state. The protocols, brokered by Germany and France, were first signed in 2014. Former Ukrainian President Pyotr Poroshenko has since admitted that Kiev’s main goal was to use the ceasefire to buy time and “create powerful armed forces.”

 

Moscow also demanded that Ukraine officially declare itself a neutral country that will never join any Western military bloc. Kiev has rejected this, insisting that the Russian offensive was completely unprovoked.

 

https://www.rt.com/russia/564003-medvedev-musk-proposal-stierlitz/

Anonymous ID: fcaaff Oct. 3, 2022, 5:42 p.m. No.17627670   🗄️.is 🔗kun

3 Oct, 2022 22:50

Trump sues CNN for defamation

The reality star turned president wants $475 million from the network for allegedly wrecking his reputation and career

 

Former US president Donald Trump is suing his media arch-nemesis, news channel CNN, for defamation, demanding $475 million for allegedly weaponizing its reputation as a “reliable source” to destroy his own. The real estate mogul turned Republican politician filed the suit on Monday in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

 

“Beyond simply highlighting any negative information about [Trump] and ignoring all positive information about him, CNN has sought to use its massive influence —purportedly as a ‘trusted’ news source — to defame [Trump] in the minds of its viewers and readers for the purpose of defeating him politically,” the suit argues.

 

It adds that CNN used “scandalous” labels to destroy the former president’s image for its audience, denouncing him as a “racist,” “Russian lackey,” “insurrectionist,” and of course “Hitler.” The latter, at least, rises to the level of “actual malice,” Trump claimed, referring to the standard required for a public figure to claim defamation in the US.

 

The lawsuit furnishes numerous examples of CNN’s anti-Trump vitriol, pointing out that even infamously Trump-averse platforms like fact-checker Politifact have given CNN the “dreaded ‘Pants On Fire!’ designation” over its Hitler comparisons – of which over 645 were found in a scan of Westlaw’s news database.

 

As a result of CNN’s constant “Trump is Hitler”narrative, its audience has irrevocably linked the two, the lawsuit charges, describing that outcome as irrevocably detrimental to his political career. It cites Project Veritas’ undercover camera footage from CNN HQ, in which network employees boast their coverage was both intended to motivate their audience to vote him out and responsible for that ultimate result.

 

CNN not only caused Trump “damage to his reputation, embarrassment, pain, humiliation, and mental anguish,” according to the lawsuit, but did so out of spite and aware they were lying, having reportedly refused to correct a list of “false and defamatory statements” Trump’s legal team sent them in July. His lawyers have demanded a removal of compensatory damage limits, $475 million in punitive damages, payment of legal and travel fees, and a trial by jury – which is presumably unlikely to be broadcast live on CNN.

 

Trump is himself currently battling multiple lawsuits, including a $250 million suit alleging fraudulent business practices in the state of New York, as well as a criminal investigation related to allegations he improperly kept classified documents on his property at Mar-a-Lago after leaving the White House. While he was impeached twice by the Democrat-led House during his four-year term, he was never convicted, and has strongly hinted he will run for president again in 2024.

 

https://www.rt.com/news/564005-trump-sues-cnn-defamation-reputation/

Anonymous ID: fcaaff Oct. 3, 2022, 5:45 p.m. No.17627685   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7727 >>7736 >>7739

3 Oct, 2022 20:03

Actor blames ‘straight people’ for gay comedy’s box-office failure

Billy Eichner, the star and co-writer of ‘Bros,’ has claimed that audiences stayed away because of the movie’s LGBTQ content

 

Hollywood actor Billy Eichner has suggested that his new movie, ‘Bros,’ is a victim of anti-LGBTQ bigotry, saying the film fared poorly at the box office because heterosexual people objected to seeing a romantic comedy with gay characters.

 

“Straight people, especially in certain parts of the country, just didn’t show up for ‘Bros,’”Eichner said on Sunday in a Twitter post. “And that’s disappointing, but it is what it is.”

 

Eichner, who co-wrote the movie and starred in it, argued that ‘Bros’ had been praised by critics. He alleged that an unidentified theater chain threatened to stop showing an advertisement for the film because of its gay content. “Everyone who isn’t a homophobic weirdo should go see ‘Bros’ tonight.”

 

The movie debuted on Friday and reportedly grossed $4.8 million at the box office, falling short of an $8-10 million target set by Universal Pictures. The studio spent an estimated $22 million to make the film and $30 million so far on advertising and promotion.

 

Eichner claimed that it’s “special and uniquely powerful to see this particular story on a big screen, especially for queer folks, who don’t get this opportunity often.” However, Hollywood has a history of commercially successful movies featuring gay characters or gay themes. For instance, ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’ grossed more than $900 million in 2018. At least eight other releases categorized as LGBTQ films, such as ‘Brokeback Mountain’ in 2005 and ‘The Imitation Game’ in 2014, raked in well over $100 million.

 

Critics pointed to various other possible reasons for the failure of ‘Bros’ at the box office, including an uninspiring marketing campaign and alienating comments by Eichner in the past. For example, Eichner posted a tweet in June saying, “Get your fictional, hateful Bible stories and your fake, fictional religious bullst out of our fking lives. F**k you.”

 

According to the Imdb.com profile for ‘Bros,’Eichner “has expressed that he does not want conservatives, especially those that voted for the 45th president of the United States and their associates, to see the film, even conservatives who identify as being part of the LGBTQ+ community, as he views them as traitors.”

 

“This you?” political strategist Doug Stafford asked. “Perhaps don’t give advice on how half or more of the country should not go to your movie.”

 

https://www.rt.com/news/564000-actor-blames-nongays-for-movie-flop/

Anonymous ID: fcaaff Oct. 3, 2022, 5:49 p.m. No.17627709   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7728 >>7762 >>7929 >>8048

3 Oct, 2022 22:56

 

Poll shows big shift in party preference for US midterms

 

Democrats have slipped from a seven-point lead to a three-point deficit heading into congressional election

US voter concerns over issues such as inflation and crime appear to be giving Republicans an edge over Democrats heading into November’s midterm congressional elections, a new poll has revealed.

 

The Monmouth University poll, which was conducted in late September and released on Monday, showed that 47% of Americans prefer that Republicans regain control of Congress, compared with 44% who want Democrats to remain in charge. The September result marked a major shift from just one month earlier, when Democrats held a 50-43 lead over Republicans.

 

Monmouth’s latest poll also may portend an advantage for the GOP in terms of voter turnout. While 58% of respondents who identify as Democrat believe it’s “very important” that their preferred party controls Congress, 62% of Republicans see the midterm results that way. In fact, voter enthusiasm among Democrats by that measure is at the lowest level this year and has dropped by five percentage points in the past month.

 

Rising concerns over the issues that voters consider most important appear to be hurting Democrats because the party’s leader, President Joe Biden, is struggling in those categories. For instance, 82% of Americans see inflation as “very important” or “extremely important” heading into the midterms, and Biden has an approval rating of only 30% on the issue. Crime ranks as the No. 2 concern, at 72%, and just 32% of Americans approve of the president’s handling of the issue. Biden has a 31% rating on immigration, which ranks as a top five issue with 67% of respondents citing it as at least very important.

 

The president’s highest approval rating, 50%, is on the Covid-19 pandemic, which only 32% of Americans see as highly important, down from 72% a year ago, the poll showed. Concerns over such issues as climate change, racial inequality and infrastructure – topics that might tend to favor Democrats – also have waned.

 

“Obviously, the Republicans are hitting away at issues where Biden – and by extension, the Democratic Party – is weakest,” said Patrick Murray, director of Monmouth’s polling institute. “But it’s also worth noting that Biden does not provide a rallying point for Democratic voters on some of the issues, such as abortion, that his party is leaning on to motivate its own base.”

 

While Republicans and Democrats are predictably polarized on key topics, Biden’s weakest issue, inflation, is the only category cited as highly important by at least 75% of independents. The president’s overall approval rating remained at 38% in September, two points above the low-water mark he reached in June. About half of Americans believe he’s doing worse than they expected, compared with 21% who say he’s outperforming their expectations.

 

https://www.rt.com/news/564006-republicans-gain-in-midterms-poll/

Anonymous ID: fcaaff Oct. 3, 2022, 6:03 p.m. No.17627810   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The Gay Crowd Doesn't Want to Drag Lena Dunham's Cadaver Around

Kevin Downey Jr.

Perennially unshaggable Lena Dunham, whose ego is dwarfed only by her bat wings, tried to suck up to the LGBTQanons, and it didn’t go well.

 

Apparently starving for attention — though not for cheeseburgers — Dunham tweeted that she wantsher future corpse to be driven in the yearly New York City Pride Parade.

 

The salad-dodging Dunham’s painful attempt to polish the apple of the gay crew was met with a dash of scorn and two scoops of hilarity.

 

One person tweeted a picture of a garbage truck and quipped “Here’s your hearse, m’lady.” Another wrote, “She died as she lived, in a ploy for attention that was as puzzling as it was desperate.” That quip has almost 18,000 “likes” compared to Dunham’s original cry-for-attention post, which has about 6,000.

 

NARCISSISM-O-RAMA! Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is hard to treat because narcissists frequently can’t acceptthat there is something wrong with them in the first place.

 

This isn’t Dunham’s first attempt at a gay-attention grab. She once publicly made her sister’s homosexuality all about Lena.

 

FUNK-O-RAMA! When Dunham isn’t busy trying to soak up attention on Twitter, she sometimes looks for it by posting nude photos on Instagram. WARNING! If you click here, you will see Lena Dunham naked.

 

“I have always felt a strong and emotional connection to members of the LGBTQ community,” Dunham revealed in a 2014 speech at the Point Honors Gala at the New York Public Library. “It was actually a huge disappointment for me when I came of age and realized that I was sexually attracted to men. So when my sister came out, I thought, ‘Thank God, now someone in this family can truly represent my beliefs and passions.’”

 

That would be the same sister Lena touched inappropriately when the girl was only one year old.

 

I’m not sure what that last sentence means but holy self-absorption, Batman! This leads us to the fine tweet below, which says it all.

 

https://pjmedia.com/culture/kevindowneyjr/2022/10/03/the-gay-crowd-doesnt-want-to-drag-lena-dunhams-cadaver-around-n1634083

Anonymous ID: fcaaff Oct. 3, 2022, 6:07 p.m. No.17627841   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Twitter Fail: Leftists Attack DeSantis but Are Too Lazy to Use Reference Materials

Lincoln Brown

Maud Newton, a writer, critic, and editor whose work has appeared in Harpers, Esquire, NYT Magazine, and The Guardian, took umbrage with Ron DeSantis. Specifically the fact that DeSantis referred to the destruction caused by Hurricane Ian on Sanibel Island as “biblical. She tweeted:

“DeSantis said there had been ‘biblical’ storm surge on Sanibel Island…This language is an evangelical dog whistle—i.e., it’s not climate change, it’s God.”

She deleted the tweet. But Pepperidge Farm remembers. And so does Twitchy. In fact, you can read it here.

 

Newton soon added, “Sometimes I stand by a tweet but delete it because I have spent enough of my life amid the rantings and abuse of Rapture-obsessed evangelicals. Good time for a Twitter break. See y’all ✌🏻.”

 

She has since limited replies to the tweet to “People @maudnewton mentioned.” Nothing like an echo chamber to make you feel vindicated.

 

As a writer, editor, and critic, Ms. Newton’s research skills could use a tad bit of honing. The term “biblical” — as in “biblical proportions” — has nothing to do with whether or not an event was caused by God. It actually refers to the scope of the incident and the damage done. An extraordinarily destructive event is said to be of “biblical proportions.” It is not connected with the Rapture, something that not all Christians agree on. This used to be common knowledge before we replaced teaching language arts and history with social engineering. And more to the point, had Ms. Newton simply used a search engine, she would have found multiple definitions of “biblical proportions.”

 

Defintitions.net says:

 

of biblical proportions (adjective)

 

Of or pertaining to a natural disaster or other cataclysmic event so immense that it brings to mind biblical accounts of horrific catastrophes.

 

of biblical proportions (adjective)

 

By extension, of or pertaining to a thing or occurrence having vast size, extent, or consequences.

 

The Free Dictionary defines the phrase as meaning:

 

Of a huge or catastrophic size, magnitude, or severity.

 

Even the Urban Dictionary, of all things, has this:

 

This refers to something which happens on the grandest scale possible on earth. This includes apocalypse, major war etc.

 

That search took me all of five minutes.

 

Another Twitter warrior posted:

 

“Ron DeSantis said the flooding was of ‘biblical proportions’. G/d sent biblical floods for one reason, just sayin.”

 

If this particular “scholar” had read the biblical story in question, she would know that after the Great Flood, God promised never again to destroy the world with a flood. He is through using floods as a tool for His wrath. But she can be forgiven to a certain degree. Most detractors of Christianity — and for that matter, many Christians — take passages of scripture and biblical stories out of context. It’s never useful or helpful, no matter who does it.

 

Sigh. Ladies, ladies, ladies. We get it: You don’t like Ron DeSantis, you don’t like men, you don’t like Christians. And you really dislike white male Christians. You’re not exactly breaking new ground, here. And we all know that Twitter exists for cheap shots, misinformation, temper tantrums, and forcing everyone to agree with you. But for your own sake, for your own edification, can you at least get the facts right? It’s still a quasi-free country and you can hate whomever you want, but at least have enough respect for yourselves to use the correct references. Unless, of course, it’s too hard to do a little extra work. Or if the context doesn’t matter.

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/lincolnbrown/2022/10/03/twitter-fail-leftists-attack-desantis-but-are-too-lazy-to-use-reference-materials-n1634055

 

(There’s some serious freaks in this world. God save us, biblically)

Anonymous ID: fcaaff Oct. 3, 2022, 6:13 p.m. No.17627880   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7896

>>17627768

She has an amazing ability of lack of self reflection. In a sense her overall view of the corruption of the US is correct, but she’s incapable of understanding when she us completly wrong about Indidivdual people. She should stay at the macro level

Anonymous ID: fcaaff Oct. 3, 2022, 6:33 p.m. No.17628024   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Report: ‘Election Integrity’ Project Worked with Feds to Censor News Sites in 2020

Allum Bokhari3 Oct 2022

 

A coalition of globalist nonprofits, academic institutions, and one private company reportedly worked with arms of the federal government and Democrat activist organizations to censor news websites in the runup to the 2020 election, and plans to do so again in 2022.

 

The consortium, called the Election Integrity Partnership, is made up of four organizations: the Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO), the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public, the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, and Graphika, a social media analytics company.

 

In the runup to the 2020 election, the consortium created a system whereby state actors including the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department could file “tickets” alongside news stories, flagging them so that Big Tech platforms could subsequently suppress or attach warning labels to them.

 

Beyond this blatant case of a private-public censorship coalition, the EIP also engaged in partisan politics, allowing the Democratic National Committee to file tickets through the system, as well as the Democrat-aligned groups Common Cause and the NAACP.

 

News outlets targeted by the EIP included Breitbart News, Fox News, the New York Post, and the Epoch Times, as well as the social media accounts of prominent conservatives Charlie Kirk, Tom Fitton, Jack Posobiec, Mark Levin, James O’Keefe, and Sean Hannity, amongst others.

 

President Donald Trump was also frequently flagged by the consortium, as well as his sons Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr.

 

New light was shed on the project through the voluntary disclosures of its own activities, published in a recent report.

 

According to the report, the EIP was successful in censoring content on social media. In 21 percent of cases, platforms labeled content identified by the EIP, and in 13 percent of cases, the content was removed from the platforms entirely.

 

The Democrat-aligned EIP, working hand-in-glove with the deep state, was therefore able to have a tangible impact on restricting the information voters were able to see on social media in the runup to the 2020 election.

 

Having successfully interfered with the 2020 election, the EIP is now gearing up to influence the upcoming midterms. “We’re getting the band back together (with several improvements) for the midterms,” said Kate Starbird of the Center for an Informed Public, in a tweet this August.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2022/10/03/report-election-integrity-project-worked-with-feds-to-censor-news-sites-in-2020/

 

(The government worked against the President of the United States, Chris Krebs and others).