Report: ‘Election Integrity’ Project Worked with Feds to Censor News Sites in 2020

Allum Bokhari3 Oct 2022

A coalition of globalist nonprofits, academic institutions, and one private company reportedly worked with arms of the federal government and Democrat activist organizations to censor news websites in the runup to the 2020 election, and plans to do so again in 2022.

The consortium, called the Election Integrity Partnership, is made up of four organizations: the Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO), the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public, the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, and Graphika, a social media analytics company.

In the runup to the 2020 election, the consortium created a system whereby state actors including the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department could file “tickets” alongside news stories, flagging them so that Big Tech platforms could subsequently suppress or attach warning labels to them.

Beyond this blatant case of a private-public censorship coalition, the EIP also engaged in partisan politics, allowing the Democratic National Committee to file tickets through the system, as well as the Democrat-aligned groups Common Cause and the NAACP.

News outlets targeted by the EIP included Breitbart News, Fox News, the New York Post, and the Epoch Times, as well as the social media accounts of prominent conservatives Charlie Kirk, Tom Fitton, Jack Posobiec, Mark Levin, James O’Keefe, and Sean Hannity, amongst others.

President Donald Trump was also frequently flagged by the consortium, as well as his sons Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr.

New light was shed on the project through the voluntary disclosures of its own activities, published in a recent report.

According to the report, the EIP was successful in censoring content on social media. In 21 percent of cases, platforms labeled content identified by the EIP, and in 13 percent of cases, the content was removed from the platforms entirely.

The Democrat-aligned EIP, working hand-in-glove with the deep state, was therefore able to have a tangible impact on restricting the information voters were able to see on social media in the runup to the 2020 election.

Having successfully interfered with the 2020 election, the EIP is now gearing up to influence the upcoming midterms. “We’re getting the band back together (with several improvements) for the midterms,” said Kate Starbird of the Center for an Informed Public, in a tweet this August.

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2022/10/03/report-election-integrity-project-worked-with-feds-to-censor-news-sites-in-2020/

(The government worked against the President of the United States, Chris Krebs and others).

=McCaskill: We Need to ‘Push’ Religious Leaders to Speak Out Against Trump

Pam Key3 Oct 2022

(They are going insane, what kind of shit did McCaskill do?)

MSNBC contributor Claire McCaskill said Monday on “Deadline” that religious leaders need to be pushed to criticize former President Donald Trump.

The panel was discussing Trump saying on Truth Social Saturday that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) had a “death wish” for supporting Democrats’ bills. He referred to McConnell’s wife, former Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao, as “China-loving wife, Coco Chow.”

McCaskill said, “I’m just worn slick being ashamed and disappointed at my former friends who are not standing up to this kind of disgusting behavior. I am just worn slick. Now, here’s a sentence that Mitch McConnell should practice in front of the mirror. I may vote for the Republican nominee, but I’m going to do everything in my power to make sure it’s not Donald Trump. They should all try that out. Liz Cheney is doing it. She’s saying she will do everything in her power to keep Donald Trump from power again. And that’s what they should all be doing.”

She added, “We’ve said on this show, week after week, and called out the cowardice of the Republican leaders, their failures to do the right thing. One of the things that we have done with extremism around the globe and even in this country is go out to communities and talk to leaders, particularly religious leaders. Maybe it’s time to call on all of the rabbis and priests and imams and ministers, especially Evangelical ministers, to ask them to take — Evangelical ministers should take the Gospel and put it up against what Donald Trump is doing and talk about that guns are not the answer, and violence is not the answer. Ministers and religious leaders in this country need to start taking a leadership role. They are sitting back and letting Donald Trump speak with moral authority with the immoral things he says and does? It is unbelievable to me. Republicans, I’ve given up on. Maybe religious leaders, maybe we should start trying to push them more.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/10/03/mccaskill-we-need-to-push-religious-leaders-to-speak-out-against-trump/

Monmouth Poll Shows 10 Point Swing Toward GOP to Control Congress Since August

The latest Monmouth University poll released on Monday showed that there had been a massive ten-point swing from August to September in favor of Republicans controlling Congress after the midterms.

The latest poll showed that the ten-point swing happened between the August and September polls. Overall the September poll showed that 47 percent would prefer the Republicans to control Congress compared to the 44 percent who said, Democrats:

Republicans: 36 percent

Doesn’t matter, but lean GOP: 11 percent

Democrats: 34 percent

Doesn’t matter, but lean Dem: Ten percent

Doesn’t matter, no lean: Eight percent

Don’t know: Two percent

Overall in August, the same poll showed at the time that 50 percent would prefer the Democrats to control Congress compared to the 43 percent who said, Republicans:

Republicans: 34 percent

Doesn’t matter, but lean GOP: Nine percent

Democrats: 38 percent

Doesn’t matter, but lean Dem: 12 percent

Doesn’t matter, no lean: Five percent

Don’t know: One percent

Additionally, with 36 days left before the election, inflation and crime were at the top of the list for what the respondents said were “extremely” or “very” important.

Eighty-two percent said inflation was “extremely” or “very” important, while 72 percent said crime, and 70 percent said elections and voting. At the bottom of the respondents’ concerns were climate change at 49 percent, the coronavirus pandemic at 32 percent, and student loan debt at 31 percent.

Moreover, 54 percent of the poll’s respondents also said it is “very important” to their party in control of Congress, while 22 percent said it’s “somewhat important,” 11 percent said “only a little important,” and 12 percent said they don’t know.

Furthermore, 59 percent said they are “extremely motivated” to vote in this year’s election, while 17 percent said “very motivated,” 13 percent said “somewhat motivated,” ten percent said “not motivated,” and one percent said they “don’t know.”

The Monmouth University poll was conducted from September 21 to 25 with a random sample of 806 adults, with a margin of error plus or minus 3.5 percent and a 95 percent confidence level.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/10/03/monmouth-poll-shows-10-point-swing-toward-gop-to-control-congress-since-august/

Senate Republicans Target Amalgamated Bank Over Credit Card Gun Control Play

AWR Hawkins3 Oct 2022

Twenty-eight Senate Republicans are zeroing in on Amalgamated Bank over credit card companies’ September 2022 decisions to recategorize gun sales in a way that allows them to be flagged.

On September 11, Breitbart News reportedthat Visa caved to Democrat pressure and agreed to give firearm sales a standalone merchant code. New York Democrats wanted the code for the purpose of flagging purchases they consider suspicious.

Mastercard and American Express gave in as well, with Mastercard going so far as to praise Congress for the midsummer passage of gun control.

Insider/Yahoo News pointed to a statement from Mastercard, which said, “We understand and appreciate the significant policy imperative in reducing gun violence and see the recent bipartisan action in Congress as a positive step. We believe it is that type of effort that will meaningfully address the tragic gun violence facing the country.”

When the Associated Press noted that Visa, Mastercard, and American Express would begin using a new merchant code for firearms, they stressed that the merchant code came from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

But 28 Republican senators believe Amalgamated Bank is central to the adoption of the new merchant code. They sent a letter to Amalgamated Bank President and Chief Executive Officer Priscilla Sims Brown, putting Brown and her bank on notice.

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), one of the letter’s signatories, posted portions of the letter, which said, “Your bank is attempting to restrict the Second Amendment rights of Americans by going around the democratic process. You should expect Congressional oversight of your actions.”

The letter continued:

It is clear from Amalgamated Bank’s website that it has fully embraced an anti-firearm agenda. Whether it is choosing to debank firearms manufacturers, forcing all commercial clients to adopt anti-gun control codes, or divesting customer assets from lawful businesses, these decisions demonstrate your attempt to force your political views on law-abiding Americans. If you want to change gun policy, you should run for office and make yourself accountable to voters. What’s worse, these actions weren’t enough for you, so you set your sights on forcing these radical and discriminatory policies on the entire financial system.

Let us be clear: weaponizing the financial system to enact far-left political goals is inexcusable… You should consider this notice to retain all communications involving your role in ISO’s categorization scheme, and you should anticipate testifying before Congress in the near future.

A Senate Judiciary Committee Aide spoke to Breitbart News about the senators’ letter and what it portends, saying, “The Republican Senators are aware of Amalgamated’s role in causing this and plan on holding them accountable.”

The aide added, “Should Republicans take back the Senate, both the Senate Banking Committee is going to look into whether Amalgamated has complied with all banking regulations while it’s pushing partisan-leftwing policies, and the Senate Judiciary Committee is going to investigate communications between Amalgamated Bank and ISO to restrict Second Amendment Rights. ”

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/10/03/senate-republicans-target-amalgamated-bank-over-credit-card-gun-control-play/

Cotton looks pretty pissed. Good!

DeSantis Challenger Charlie Crist Suggests Hurricane Response Must Include Addressing Climate Change

Rep. Charlie Crist (D-FL), the Democrat challenging Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) in Florida’s upcoming gubernatorial election, suggested this week that hurricane response must include addressing climate change as he seemingly blamed the size and intensity of recent storms on the phenomenon.

“These storms are going to continue to come, but we also need to address climate change for crying out loud,” Crist said during a recent appearance on MSNBC, seemingly blaming the size and intensity of Hurricane Ian on climate change.

“They’re getting bigger. They’re getting stronger. You know the size of this storm, you could have put three Hurricane Charleys, which hit the same part of Florida, inside the eye of Ian. I mean, so there’s proof positive that we need to address climate change,” he said.

“We need to have better preparation when these storms start coming our way. We need to be on watch. Prepared. Utilize the funds that are in the current budget for structural soundness of these homes so that a catastrophe to this degree doesn’t happen again,” the Democrat added:

Crist is hardly the only Democrat to blame hurricanes on climate change, as failed presidential candidate Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) made a similar assertion last week, generating mockery across social media.

During an appearance on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Klobuchar bragged of Democrats doing “something about climate change for the first time in decades.”

“That’s why we’ve got to win this, as that hurricane bears down on Florida. We got a win in the midterms,” she added:

Her response generated significant mockery as many pointed out that Florida has experienced hurricanes throughout recorded history.

Indeed, hundreds of hurricanes have hit the U.S. coast throughout history, but the U.S. has only regularly recorded the extreme weather events for about the last 171 years, as records trace back to 1851. Regardless, from 1851 to current day, hundreds have smashed into U.S. coastlines. Even TIME recognized this, citing data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA):

Data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) shows that there have been more than 300 hurricanes that have directly hit the U.S. coastline since 1851, of which more than 80% of those hit just three states — Florida, Texas, and Louisiana.

While Hurricane Ian will certainly go down in history as an extremely devastating storm, it is hardly the first, despite the left’s suggestions otherwise.

For example, NOAA identifies the 1935 “Labor Day hurricane” as a record-setting storm, with the lowest central pressure at the time of its U.S. landfall on the Florida Keys.

Hurricane Katrina in 2005 caused the highest storm surge recorded, and the Galveston Texas Hurricane of 1900 — 122 years ago — is recorded as the deadliest hurricane hitting the U.S. specifically, as the Category 4 storm caused between 8,000 and 12,000 deaths, per NOAA data.

It remains unclear what specific policy Democrat politicians believe would actually alter extreme weather, lessening the size, intensity, and frequency of hurricanes.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/10/03/desantis-challenger-charlie-crist-suggests-hurricane-response-must-include-addressing-climate-change/

God Almighty, kill the climate change nonsense once and for all, freeze all the assholes in warm climates, to prove you are in charge.

>>17628165

You gotta admit, Breitbart picks the best hysterical pictures to get their message across

Nolte: Planned Parenthood to Park Mobile Abortion Clinic at Red State Borders

John Nolte3 Oct 2022

As you read the piece below, never forget that the pro-baby-killing fanatics at Planned Parenthood receive hundreds of millions of your tax dollars every year…

Imagine being so demonic and desperate to butcher unborn babies that you create a mobile baby-killing machine to park on the borders of red states that have restricted or outlawed the barbaric, obscene and medically unnecessary act of elective abortion…

Courtesy of Planned Parenthood’s fellow welfare queens at the far-left NPR:

With a growing number of patients in states that now prohibit abortion traveling for the procedure, Planned Parenthood says [sic] will soon open its first mobile abortion clinic in the country, in southern Illinois.

“Our goal is to reduce the hundreds of miles that people are having to travel now in order to access care…and meet them where they are,” said Yamelsie Rodriguez, President of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region and Southwest Missouri, said [sic] in an interview with NPR.

The mobile clinic will begin offering consultations and dispensing abortion pills later this year. It will operate within Illinois, where abortion remains legal, but will be able to travel closer to neighboring states’ borders, reducing the distance many patients travel for the procedure.

The plan — naturally — is for Planned Parenthood to expand its mobile baby-killing machines in the future.

Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger, a racist eugenicist who wanted to exterminate the black race. Two-time presidential loser Hillary Clinton is a big Margaret Sanger fan.

Of the 60 or so million babies murdered by way of abortion since 1973, some 18 million were black babies. So, while black people make up about 13 percent of the population, their babies make up about 30 percent of abortions. So, mission accomplished, right Planned Parenthood?

Gee, I wonder which population centers Planned Parenthood’s death vans will park near?

Just like mutilating children forever in the name of “trans rights” is big-big-big business, so too is killing babies — especially black babies.

Planned Parenthood isn’t looking to bring medical care to anyone. They see a profit in this. Millions and millions in profit. This death cult isn’t just a death cult; it’s a lucrative death cult to the tune of $1.6 billion in revenue per year.

Planned Parenthood regularly lies about how “only three percent” of its services are abortion services.

Yeah, right… That’s why Planned Parenthood is spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to purchase and equip mobile baby-killing factories.

If baby-butchering was only three percent, Planned Parenthood could easily set up abortion-free Planned Parenthood clinics in states that have outlawed the unnecessary obscenity of elective abortions. But Planned Parenthood doesn’t. In fact, Planned Parenthood exits states that cut taxpayer funding for abortion clinics. In other words, rather than stop performing abortions, these baby killers would prefer to close altogether. But-but-but you told me abortion only makes up three percent of your services?

Planned Parenthood is not about health care; it’s about a lucrative and racist death cult. So lucrative, they will drive their infanticide machines right to your door.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/10/03/nolte-planned-parenthood-park-mobile-abortion-clinic-red-state-borders/

Wow that sounds very safe!

Report: White House Fears Hunter Could Doom Joe Biden’s Potential 2024 Campaign

Wendell Husebø3 Oct 2022

Aides in the Biden administration fear Hunter and President Joe Biden’s shady business activities could doom the president’s potential campaign in 2024, Politico reported.

The Republicans’ investigations into the Biden family upon retaking the House in November could derail any hope of Joe Biden’s returning to the White House after 2024.

According to Politico’s Eugene Daniels, Jonathan Lemire, Jordain Carney, “[i]f a GOP-led House turns up the heat on Hunter Biden, it could weigh heavily in the president’s decision to run for a second term.”

“White House officials said Biden is preparing to seek reelection, but a final decision likely won’t be made for several months, with the first lady having an outsized influence. Some aides believe that Biden could forgo another campaign if it would shield his family from hostile congressional investigations,” the report states.

Rep. James Comer (R-KY), ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, and Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, have both pledged to investigate the Biden family business if they retake the House in November.

“We’ve got a lot of opportunities. We’ve got a lot of work to do. Obviously, we’re going to have some high-profile committee hearings on the investigations dealing with Hunter Biden,” Comer told the publication.

The GOP’s plan to probe the Bidens has likely alarmed many in the White House, causing aides to begin preparing messaging strategies for the “investigative onslaught” coming if Republicans retake the House.

A select committee may be deployed to investigate the Bidens, Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) told Breitbart News in August. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) also told Breitbart News that it is “absolutely” an option to probe the “big guy.” A select committee is a type of temporary committee created to conduct investigations or consider other measures on a specific topic.

“I think it can be done over oversight. There’s plenty there [to investigate],” Mace told Breitbart News. “But if that is not enough, once the traditional committee process investigates – then by all means – a special committee would be another option, absolutely.”

The president’s son is reportedly under investigation for tax fraud, money laundering, and gun and foreign lobbying violations by Trump-appointed United States Attorney David Weiss. Joe Biden’s Attorney General Merrick Garland has refused to say whether a special counsel should be placed over the investigation to maintain a just probe. A special counsel would distance from Joe Biden and the investigation into Hunter and the Biden family business dealings.

Recent polling shows 62 percent of registered voters believe Joe Biden likely consulted and perhaps profited from the Biden family business dealings. Fifty-eight percent of voters believed Joe Biden played a role in his family’s business. Sixty percent said Hunter Biden has sold “influence and access” to the president.

President Joe Biden and his staff have claimed at least seven times the president has had no part in the family business, but evidence shows he has been involved in at least 17 instances.

Hunter Biden is the subject of a brand new narrative film, My Son Hunter, marking Breitbart’s expansion into film distribution. The film was directed by Robert Davi (Goonies, License to Kill, Die Hard) and stars Laurence Fox (Victoria, Inspector Lewis, The Professor and The Madman) as Hunter Biden; Gina Carano (The Mandalorian, Deadpool, Heist) as a Secret Service agent; and John James (Dynasty) as Joe Biden. It was produced by Phelim McAleer and Ann McElhinney (Gosnell movie, FBI Lovebirds: Undercovers) from the Unreported Story Society. The film is available RIGHT NOW for Streaming and Downloading at MySonHunter.com. The trailer below has been viewed almost 5 million times across social media.

The Ann & Phelim Scoop

https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2022/10/03/report-white-house-fears-hunter-could-doom-joe-bidens-potential-2024-campaign/

He’s not even capable now, no way he’s running in 2024

Supreme Court to Consider Electoral Argument Targeted by DOJ, January 6 Committee as ‘Insurrection’

Joel B. Pollak3 Oct 2022

The argument that state legislatures have sole power to interpret their election laws, and the process for selecting presidential electors, is set to be heard by the Supreme Court — even as those on one side of the argument are being targeted by investigators.

In recent weeks, the Department of Justice has served subpoenas and search warrants on dozens of individuals who have argued that presidential electors can legally be rejected by the Vice President and sent back to state legislatures for further reconsideration.

The subpoenas have been part of a so-called “fake electors” inquiry into alternate slates of electors prepared by Trump supporters after the 2020 election. They were prepared as a remedy in the event that courts ruled state legislatures could decide electoral slates. However, the media, the Democratic Party, and investigators — both in congress and in law enforcement — have cast the alternate electoral slates as if they were an attempt to defraud Congress and impose pro-Trump electors outside any constitutional process.

The Supreme Court, in Moore v. Harper, will consider the question of whether the state courts can overturn rules for elections that are established by the state legislatures. The question concerns Article I, Section 4, of the U.S. Constitution, which states: “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.” Likewise, Article II, Section 1, provides: “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors.”

Trump supporters, citing disputes over results in several states, objected to the intervention of state courts in voting processes, often at the behest of Democrats and left-wing groups who wanted to expand vote-by-mail and other innovations.

At the time, the Supreme Court declined to hear appeals from Republicans who argued that state courts had overstepped their legal authority. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote at the time that the Court had failed to deal with an issue that would recur — and it has.

The dispute in Moore v. Harper is not about the 2020 election, but rather about congressional redistricting in North Carolina. However, it has implications for the arguments made about the 2020 election — arguments now considered part of an “insurrection.”

Whatever the Court’s decision in Moore v. Harper, the fact that the argument of Trump supporters will be represented by litigants before the highest court in the land calls into question the justification for investigating those who made those arguments in public.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/10/03/supreme-court-to-consider-electoral-argument-targeted-by-doj-january-6-committee-as-insurrection/

Good night frens

>>17628256

I had a thought come up today, the only reason they gave us Roe vs Wade, EPA and right to carry guns is because Roberts caved on the election of 2020. Lets see what they have blackmailed Roberts on this time.