>>17632422
No, I didn't mean to say what I didn't.
I said what I meant.
I said grammar ultimately EXTENDS from the one source that makes all meaning meaningful.
Everything we do is not 'divided' from what sourced everyone and everything.
If your argument is that grammar is 'a weak ass attempt to explain God', then re-inputting that statement back into its own logic, self-referential analysis speaking, it follows that WHAT YOU WROTE is also 'a weak ass attempt' to explain whatever it is you wanted to explain, of which I will borrow from your own logic and assert that I know what you 'meant to say' because I somehow have a COMPLETE understanding of not only myself but even what is outside my incomplete self, thus contradicting myself and thus revealing to me you're contradicting yourself.