Anonymous ID: 7a81f7 Oct. 4, 2022, 3:37 p.m. No.17632394   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2404 >>2568 >>2588 >>2754 >>2983 >>2994 >>3056

RED OCTOBER … Q140 "WHAT IF CHINA, RUSSIA AND OTHERS ARE HELPING POTUS ELIMINATE THE NWO?"

 

POTUS45 dined at Forbidden Palace?

 

Anon's mind is BLOWN of this means what I think it means.

 

If the China is coordinating with Q team, and the Democrat Party's handlers today is the CCP, after strings to SA were cut, then…this could be the end of the Democrat Party as a political entity.

Anonymous ID: 7a81f7 Oct. 4, 2022, 3:53 p.m. No.17632442   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2454

>>17632422

No, I didn't mean to say what I didn't.

I said what I meant.

I said grammar ultimately EXTENDS from the one source that makes all meaning meaningful.

Everything we do is not 'divided' from what sourced everyone and everything.

 

If your argument is that grammar is 'a weak ass attempt to explain God', then re-inputting that statement back into its own logic, self-referential analysis speaking, it follows that WHAT YOU WROTE is also 'a weak ass attempt' to explain whatever it is you wanted to explain, of which I will borrow from your own logic and assert that I know what you 'meant to say' because I somehow have a COMPLETE understanding of not only myself but even what is outside my incomplete self, thus contradicting myself and thus revealing to me you're contradicting yourself.

Anonymous ID: 7a81f7 Oct. 4, 2022, 4:07 p.m. No.17632481   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2493

>>17632454

>Ignoring the part where you TOTALLY missed the obvious satire (hi bot!), you ironically actually managed to understand my point while imagining that you contradicted it.

You imagined I added a 'contradiction' to what you said, when in reality what I did do was merely describe your own inconsistent self-contradicting logic.

You can project and imagine 'negations' are originating outside you in this case, but you're sourcing your own negations of yourself, by attacking the very grammar you are depending on.

Anonymous ID: 7a81f7 Oct. 4, 2022, 5:42 p.m. No.17632776   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17632493

Everything I wrote was satire, so you still lose.

Kek

>You can never rely upon language

You're denouncing the very thing you're using to 'prove' a fact and presenting to others as referencing a truth about reality, my self-contradicting obtuse little fren.