https://t.me/No_BS_NewS/68627
'lesbian' (& 'gtbq+') = sexually abused as a child
New Scooby Doo movie for kids: Velma is a lesbian 🏳️🌈
https://t.me/No_BS_NewS/68620
(((inbreds))) including dogs and all child rapists are always as evil as possible and are to be drowned.
Ummm
Whitmer to Hire Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Consultant for Children
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/madelineleesman/2022/10/04/whitmer-to-hire-sexual-orientation-and-gender-identity-consultant-for-children-n2613943
https://t.me/No_BS_NewS/68629
https://t.me/realKarliBonne/124877
the cross looks like an 'unfolded' Q
bots is twitters businessmodel i.e. 'perceived influence'
Picture on German TV, understandable without translation.
Who blew up the pipe?
By Zloy Proof
https://t.me/DonbassDevushka/27991
I had a similar 'vision' today of how Christians are connected to heaven.
'assets'
💬 How whiteness poses the greatest threat to US democracy
📌 The Guardian (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/oct/04/how-whiteness-poses-the-greatest-threat-to-us-democracy)
✅ New Right News (http://t.me/NewRightNews)
A growing chorus of voices is warning that our democracy is in grave danger, but there is much less discussion of the exact nature of the threat. Recently, President Biden emphasized the severity of the threat by going to the place where the constitution was signed to give what the White House described as “a speech on the continued battle for the soul of the nation”.
Biden specifically named “Donald Trump and the Maga Republicans” as the ones carrying out the attacks, and that is accurate, on the surface. The deeper, more longstanding threat, however, was articulated by historian Taylor Branch in a 2018 conversation with author Isabel Wilkerson recounted in Wilkerson’s book Caste. As they discussed how the rise of white domestic terrorism under Trump was part of the backlash to the country’s growing racial diversity, Branch noted that, “people said they wouldn’t stand for being a minority in their own country”. He went on to add, “the real question would be if people were given the choice between democracy and whiteness, how many would choose whiteness?”
Whiteness is the deeper threat because championing whiteness is what makes Trump powerful. People forget that Trump was not particularly well-regarded before he started attacking Mexican immigrants and signaling to white people that he would be the defender of their way of life. In the months before he launched his campaign, he was polling at just 4% in the May 2015 ABC/Washington Post poll. After stirring the racial resentment pot, his popularity took off, growing exponentially in a matter of weeks and propelling him to the front of the pack by mid-July 2015 when he commanded support of 24% of voters, far ahead of all the other Republican candidates.
https://t.me/NewRightNews/6467
(((inbreds))) and all child rapists are always as evil as possible and are to be drowned.
>Whiteness is the deeper threat because championing whiteness is what makes Trump powerful.
💬 Supreme Court To Decide Whether YouTube Can Be Sued For Abetting Terrorism
It’s the first Monday in October so the Supreme Court is back in session. It issued a list of various cases that it will decide in the coming term. It was already public knowledge that the Court will be deciding a number of important and controversial cases, including cases on affirmative action, environmental protection, and voting rights.
Today the Court announced that it will be taking another huge case, Gonzales v. Google.
The plaintiffs in this case allege that YouTube “aided and abetted the November 2015 terrorist attack in Paris, France committed by ISIS”. They claim that ISIS used YouTube to recruit members and “communicate its desired messages.”
YouTube’s parent company, Google GOOG +3.1%, argues that the suit is prohibited by Sec. 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields providers of “interactive computer service[s],” such as Google and YouTube, from claims that treat the provider “as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”
In other words, if you believe that YouTube has shown harmful content, you have to sue the creator of that content, not YouTube.
The company claims that “Every minute, YouTube users upload over 500 hours of new content” so one can hardly expect them to take responsibility for every uploaded video. They say they need the protection of Sec. 230 because, without it, they would have to censor every video that might possibly lead to liability.
Sec. 230 is in the cross hairs of both conservatives and liberals these days.
The political left believes that there is too much right wing hate speech on the internet these days and would like to strip websites of their immunity for allowing access to hateful content. The political right believes that the websites are dominated by progressive Silicon Valley types who are too quick to kick conservatives off of their platforms.
It was something of a surprise that the Supreme Court took this case. Congress is actively considering a dozen or so bills that would amend Sec. 230. They range from the “Limiting Section 230 Immunity to Good Samaritans Act” to the “Civil Rights Modernization Act of 2021,” which would strip Sec. 230 protection for content that “flaunts bedrock civil rights protections,” to the “Abandoning Online Censorship Act”, which simply repeals it altogether.
Usually when there is this much congressional activity about amending a law, the Court is inclined the let the dust settle before it weighs in.
Chances are that it is the Court’s conservatives who are responsible for the agreeing to hear the case. (Only four of the nine Justices have to vote to hear a case, and the public doesn’t get to know which four did so.)
Clarence Thomas, the Court’s most conservative Justice, is on record as criticizing Sec. 230 for giving digital companies legal immunity without imposing “corresponding responsibilities”.
The plaintiffs in this case claim that they aren’t suing You Tube over the content as much as they are suing it over the company’s algorithms that recommend videos to users.
The idea is that someone who shows some interest in terrorist recruitment videos will be shown more recruitment videos based on past viewing habits. YouTube counters that it invests substantial resources in “technology that identifies and removes terrorism-related videos and works to ‘identify content that may be being used to radicalize and recruit extremists’.”
Algorithms are at the heart of what companies like YouTube do, so if the Court rules that they can be sued over them that will be a big shake up in the industry. With Congress already looking at a variety of reforms, that would be a very aggressive move by the Court.
On the other hand, looking at the Court’s decisions on abortion and gun rights last term, that might fit right in with this Court’s current approach.
📌 Forbes
https://www.forbes.com/sites/evangerstmann/2022/10/03/supreme-court-to-decide-whether-youtube-can-be-sued-for-abetting-terrorism/?sh=62d8e34b1016
✅ New Right News (http://t.me/NewRightNews)
💬 House probes antisemitism as right-wing 'replacement theory' grows
📌 MSNBC (https://www.msnbc.com/the-reidout/reidout-blog/house-committee-replacement-theory-antisemitism-extremism-rcna50482)
✅ New Right News (http://t.me/NewRightNews)
https://t.me/NewRightNews/6470
💬 White House unveils artificial intelligence 'Bill of Rights'
The Biden administration unveiled a set of far-reaching goals Tuesday aimed at averting harms caused by the rise of artificial intelligence systems, including guidelines for how to protect people’s personal data and limit surveillance.
The Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights notably does not set out specific enforcement actions, but instead is intended as a White House call to action for the U.S. government to safeguard digital and civil rights in an AI-fueled world, officials said.
“This is the Biden-Harris administration really saying that we need to work together, not only just across government, but across all sectors, to really put equity at the center and civil rights at the center of the ways that we make and use and govern technologies,” said Alondra Nelson, deputy director for science and society at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. “We can and should expect better and demand better from our technologies.”
The office said the white paper represents a major advance in the administration’s agenda to hold technology companies accountable, and highlighted various federal agencies’ commitments to weighing new rules and studying the specific impacts of AI technologies. The document emerged after a year-long consultation with more than two dozen different departments, and also incorporates feedback from civil society groups, technologists, industry researchers and tech companies including Palantir and Microsoft.
It puts forward five core principles that the White House says should be built into AI systems to limit the impacts of algorithmic bias, give users control over their data and ensure that automated systems are used safely and transparently.
The non-binding principles cite academic research, agency studies and news reports that have documented real-world harms from AI-powered tools, including facial recognition tools that contributed to wrongful arrests and an automated system that discriminated against loan seekers who attended a Historically Black College or University.
The white paper also said parents and social workers alike could benefit from knowing if child welfare agencies were using algorithms to help decide when families should be investigated for maltreatment.
Earlier this year, after the publication of an AP review of an algorithmic tool used in a Pennsylvania child welfare system, OSTP staffers reached out to sources quoted in the article to learn more, according to multiple people who participated in the call. AP’s investigation found that the Allegheny County tool in its first years of operation showed a pattern of flagging a disproportionate number of Black children for a “mandatory” neglect investigation, when compared with white children.
…
📌 Associated Press
https://www.chron.com/news/article/White-House-unveils-artificial-intelligence-Bill-17485423.php
✅ New Right News (http://t.me/NewRightNews)
https://t.me/NewRightNews/6476
= funding to see how to weaponize 'a.i.' ~ 'ecohealth' funding to develop pathogens
anubis is the 'anti-christ' the 'khrist of the inbred' or 'the least inbred' of the (((inbreds))), a jackal ~ (((jakob))) that after 'learning' that it is a product of (((inbreeding))) and should never exist as how the (((inbred))) judas was made to hang by Jesus God, the (((inbred))) will if they do not commit suicide always try to become as evil as possible, i.e. the 'opposite/anti' of Christ 'to keep living' and will start to rape children unless killed.
(((inbreeding))) = child rape = endless death = losing Jesus to become as evil as possible and has to be killed to protect children from rape and murder.
letting undocumented people who crossed the border illegally vote is somehow not treason.
💬 Surveillance shift: San Francisco pilots program allowing police to live monitor private security cameras
Last week San Francisco city leaders approved a 15-month pilot allowing police to monitor live footage from surveillance cameras owned by consenting businesses and civilians without a warrant.
The 7-4 decision by the San Francisco board of supervisors was a major loss for a broad coalition of civil liberties groups that had argued the move would give police unprecedented surveillance powers. It also seemingly marked a departure from the progressive stance on surveillance the city’s leadership had previously maintained.
In May 2019, the board had made history by making the city the first to ban the use of facial recognition by any local government agency. At the time, supervisor Aaron Peskin said, the city had an “an outsize responsibility to regulate the excesses of technology”.
But more than three years, a pandemic and many protests against police injustice later, some members of the board now say they need to balance concerns for privacy with the need to allow law enforcement officials to “utilize certain technologies to make San Francisco safer”.
📌 The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/oct/04/san-francisco-police-video-surveillance
✅ New Right News (http://t.me/NewRightNews)
https://t.me/NewRightNews/6477
NEW - China continues to build inhumane "quarantine camps" at a rapid pace throughout the country.
This one is said to be located in Sichuan Province and can imprison up to 30,000 people.
@disclosetv
Once they touch soil now citizens, still not domestic terrorisms….22
EXCLUSIVE: ‘A Nexus To Terrorism’: Illegals Flagged As Potential National Security Risks Soared Nearly 600% In Last Year
The number of illegal aliens labeled as “special interest migrants” for potential national security risks increased by nearly 600% to 25,627 in fiscal year 2022, according to internal Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation.
Of the total, 60% of the illegal migrants were from Turkey, a country where Islamic State and other foreign terrorist organizations are known to operate, according to the State Department.
“Anybody that doesn’t think that serious threats to this country are sneaking in right now is naïve,” former Border Patrol Chief Rodney Scott told the DCNF.
,,,
https://dailycaller.com/2022/10/03/migrants-immigration-border/
https://t.me/No_BS_NewS/68653
“special interest migrants” for potential national security risks increased by nearly 600% to 25,627 in fiscal year 2022.
Disney Cancels Its New Release of "Little Demon" About a Woman Impregnated by Satan and Her Antichrist Daughter
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/10/disney-cancels-new-release-little-demon-woman-impregnated-satan-antichrist-daughter/
Biden also wants a handshake
https://t.me/DonbassDevushka/28001
Pic 1. Who blew the pipelines? (From German TV)
Pic 2. Anglo-American military bases in Germany
Conclusion: Awkwaaaard
https://t.me/DonbassDevushka/28010
A Chinese diplomat hinted at US involvement in the Nord Stream explosions. Cao Yi posted a post saying the United States hates these Russian gas pipelines.
TASS
https://t.me/DonbassDevushka/28018
Wear and tear on a polish Krab SPG
https://t.me/DonbassDevushka/28054
https://archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A%22Deutsche+Gesellschaft+f%C3%83%C2%BCr+Christliche+Kunst%22
https://archive.org/search.php?query=title%3A%28%2Agypt%29%20AND%20date%3A%5B1830-01-01%20TO%201945-01-31%5D
🇷🇺🇺🇦Donbass. Yesterday's launches of the Ukrainian MLRS HIMARS.
https://t.me/DonbassDevushka/28077
🇨🇵🇷🇺🇺🇦 Donbass. APU strikes with the use of 155-mm self-propelled guns CAESAR.
https://t.me/DonbassDevushka/28124
Ukrainian tank blowing its top
https://t.me/DonbassDevushka/28191
https://archive.org/details/gloryofbyzantium0000unse/mode/1up?view=theater
https://archive.org/search.php?query=title%3A%28%2Agypt%29%20AND%20date%3A%5B1830-01-01%20TO%201945-01-31%5D
forced conscription = suicide
AFU drg group, meet their bitter end at Zaporozhye
https://t.me/DonbassDevushka/28341