Anonymous ID: 672c67 Oct. 5, 2022, 7:54 p.m. No.17636208   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>17635755

>so all you digital soldiers want a juicy dig? look into who got the first U.S. LNG terminals financed, licensed, and built 17 years ago, and then youโ€™ll understand why there is a bubbly place in the ocean and who is making a killing right now. o7

digs requested

Anonymous ID: 672c67 Oct. 5, 2022, 7:57 p.m. No.17636214   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6224 >>6257

>>17635801

 

>First one opened in 2016. What do you mean 17 years ago?

 

https://maritime-executive.com/article/first-us-lng-fueling-terminal-opens

 

FREEPORT, Texas, March 25 (Reuters) - Freeport LNG import terminal hopes to receive its first liquefied natural gas cargo by the end of April and be commercially open for business by June 1, officials told a kickoff briefing Tuesday.

 

The $1-billion project, which will have the capacity to send out 1.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day when operational, would be the first new onshore U.S. LNG import terminal opened in more than 25 years.

 

โ€œItโ€™s very satisfying,โ€ Charles Reimer, president of Freeport LNG Development LP, told a briefing to prepare the news media for the event.

 

Another terminal, 90 miles northeast near Port Arthur, also is very near completion and running a close race with Freeport for startup.

 

The $1.5-billion, 2.6 Bcf per day Sabine Pass LNG terminal expects its first cargo in the next few weeks and plans commercial startup before June 30. Its kickoff briefing and tour is scheduled for April 21.

 

When finished, the two will lead a parade of terminal startups that will double U.S. LNG import capacity in about 18 months. Opening of Sabine, Freeport and three other terminals will raise U.S. import capacity from about 6 Bcfd to 13 Bcfd.

Anonymous ID: 672c67 Oct. 5, 2022, 8:11 p.m. No.17636260   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>17636224

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32205

 

as of 2009:

 

Proposed LNG Import Terminals in the United States

LNG tankers unload their cargo at dedicated marine terminals which store and regasify the LNG

for distribution to domestic markets. Onshore terminals consist of docks, LNG handling

equipment, storage tanks, and interconnections to regional gas transmission pipelines and electric

power plants. Offshore terminals regasify and pump the LNG directly into offshore natural gas

pipelines or may store LNG for later injection into offshore pipelines.

There are seven active onshore LNG import terminals in the United States: Everett,

Massachusetts; Lake Charles, Louisiana; Cove Point, Maryland; Elba Island, Georgia; Peรฑuelas,

Puerto Rico; Freeport, Texas; and Sabine Pass, Louisiana. There are two active offshore import

terminals, one located in the Gulf of Mexico and a second near Boston, Massachusetts. (There is

also one export terminal in Kenai, Alaska.) In addition to these active terminals, some 25 LNG

terminal proposals have been approved by regulators across North America to serve the U.S.

market Figure 1. A number of these proposals have been withdrawn, however, due to siting

problems, financing problems, or other reasons. Developers have proposed another 8 U.S.

terminals prior to filing formal siting applications.11