Anonymous ID: 060c19 Oct. 5, 2022, 9 p.m. No.17636463   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6477 >>6486 >>6494 >>6628 >>6680

>>17636432

I have been here for about 4 years, and I have also argued with Gary over his let's just say "over the top" use of the words "Jew" and "Boomer."

But what is he doing that is bannable, if that is even a word, when he speaks "his" "Truth"?

Is this something that we shy away from or do we counter his bullshit with facts?

I just think that banning people with whom we disagree is an easy way out, and turns us all into hypocrites when we whine about twitter, Facebook, and other social media banning us, when in turn, we ban people like Gary for posting what he believes.

Are we as weak as the democrats?

>>17636457

But does not the Twitter and facebook group see us the same way?

Thinks about it.

Anonymous ID: 060c19 Oct. 5, 2022, 9:07 p.m. No.17636489   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6598

>>17636477

I completely agree with you, anon.

I think Gary has his issues, but I have not seen an instance when he crossed the line of what I would consider to be a bannable offense, and I cannot understand why he gets banned for simply being an idiot.

Anonymous ID: 060c19 Oct. 5, 2022, 9:10 p.m. No.17636506   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6583 >>6680 >>6757

>>17636494

it does not matter if they are permanent or not.

Are we are bad as our enemies? Is that the "Moral" standard we are trying to achieve?

If so, we may as well vote democrat in the next election. We are no better than they are.

Anonymous ID: 060c19 Oct. 5, 2022, 9:55 p.m. No.17636662   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17636652

Because it gives him attention.

He iphops, and then points out the ban.

don't forget that there are moar lurkers than posters.

That give him power, imho.

Anonymous ID: 060c19 Oct. 5, 2022, 10:28 p.m. No.17636769   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6820

>>17636757

>Same with what we do on this board. Our aim is not to ban or delete on a whim, it's to promote the ability to anons to talk things out and post memes, digs and prayers that embody what ideas about which Q writes. Shitposting is ok, too. But when it becomes obviously combative, destructive, and violence in ton (espec when repeated), it crosses a line and may be deleted. Not only because it interferes with anons but may also endangers the site.

You are using weasel words.

Gary posts offensive comments towards "Jews" and "Boomers."

As a Boomer, I have taken offense many times, and called him out on his bigotry.

I have as of yet to see anything that he has posted as banable.

Offending people is not something that I would consider to be reason to ban.

t. Lame assed boomer that believes in free speech.