Anonymous ID: bd6f12 Oct. 7, 2022, 11:21 a.m. No.17661992   🗄️.is 🔗kun

No information circulated over anonymous insecure networks, built to intelligence agency specs, as the internet was, can be trusted.

The internet was designed to be irremediably insecure by intel agencies to facilitate illicit commerce and permit universal surveillance and psychospiritual control.

 

We've exposed overt lies propagated by legacy media, but less evident, more serious, damage is done silently, by subliminal embeds, subsonics and influence technologies which manipulate memory and perception by hypnotic induction and implanted suggestions – processes which mostly happen below the viewers’ threshold of conscious awareness.

 

Anyone can inject toxic self-replicating material into media content streams over anonymous insecure networks. Network user’s cognitive autonomy and physical security depend on the integrity of the network which serves to connect them as much as it does the integrity of the content producer.

 

Our internet is not only insecure by design, it is irremediably insecure by design. It doesn’t have to be that way, but it is that way.

 

Civilization rests on identity and advanced computational civilization rests on identity-over-networks. We need to know to a high degree of assurance who originated our email, who runs what appears to be a merchant or bank website and who owns, transmits, and produces our news and “entertainment” media content to know whether to trust that website, entertainment or media content.

 

A high percentage of the data we receive is not only network delivered but network sourced, and a news story will contain generations of layered error and inherited assumptions. When unrecognized errors accumulate in our circulating information supply, (news and entertainment content) our ability to make good decisions is gradually degraded. We make social and economic decisions based on what we assume to be facts - and the unrecognized errors in that data produce errors of ever-increasing magnitude. This not a hypothesis, it’s an axiom, and is cited by John von Neumann in “Computation and the Brain” JvN’s never completed final work.

 

We know technologies exist which permit precise control of individual and group information environments. News feeds, display ads, forum topics and visible response; all can be individually curated to produce predictable effects on a targeted individual or group.

 

Civilization, community and commerce all rest on identity, and we have no assured anonymity (by design) on the spy-built internet. Nor would we give up our real anonymity (if we had it) for the sake of secure networking. We don’t have real anonymity on the internet, though people who use C_A’s TOR mix net and proton mail users think so.

 

There are righteous reasons for anonymity and for that reason assured elective anonymity must be integral to the information system of the future.

 

How do we get both – assured identity AND anonymity on the same network without compromising either?

 

We the People need trusted networking to reliably distribute information that is real and true and important, information every person needs to make informed decisions. We the People’s decisions can be no better that the information they are based on – and right now they are based on accumulated MSM deceptions and psychological operations whose objective is terror.

 

In order to be secure FOR all, the internet must be secure FROM all, including the people who build it.

 

That's why an open, international program is essential, and why an information distribution platform or network is a UTILITY. It can never belong to a private company or a nation state entity. It MUST belong to its user’s information is a substance as essential to us as water and its purity is equally important.

 

DIG MEME PRAY

Anonymous ID: bd6f12 Oct. 7, 2022, 11:22 a.m. No.17662123   🗄️.is 🔗kun

You are witnessing the systematic destruction of the OLD GUARD.

Dark to LIGHT.

Hunters become the HUNTED.

NowComesTHEP@in—23!!!

We are going LIVE-24 [comb your hair]

[ZERO-Day]

[self destructing]

55

17

33

LB

They want you DIVIDED.

DIVIDED by RACE.

DIVIDED by CULTURE.

DIVIDED by CLASS.

DIVIDED YOU ARE WEAK.

TOGETHER YOU ARE STRONG.

WE, THE PEOPLE.

WWG1WGA!

Q

[Be Ready]

[Bob]

The flood is coming.

Emails, videos, audio, pics, etc.

THE SHOT HEARD AROUND THE WORLD.

THE GREAT AWAKENING.

A WEEK TO REMEMBER.

Fight.

Fight.

Fight.

BQQM!

BQQM!

BQQM!

BQQM

DARK TO LIGHT

NCSWIC

WWG1WGA

ENOU[G]H IS EN[o]UGH

Every [3] letter is here.

THE POWER YOU HAVE IS REAL

WE THE PEOPLE

You are in the middle of something historic.

[THEY] NEVER THOUGHT SHE WOULD LOSE

[THEY] HATE AMERICA

[The 16 Year Plan To Destroy America]

Hussein [8]

HOTDOGS

Pure EVIL.

[THEY] FEAR the STORM.

PAIN

PANIC IN D.C.

PRECIPICE

TRUTH to power.

Trust yourself

Qf3

CHECKMATE

Who financed 9-11?

Who was Bin Laden's handler?

DD = DANGEROUS DRAGONS

DD = DANIEL DEFENSE

LIZARDS

Reptile eggs

These people HATE America.

These people are SICK.

E[y]e of Horus

Horus e[Ye of Ra

Horus [P]riory of Sion

VATICAN JESUIT CROWN

PBB = PROJECT BLUE BEAM

PLG = PROJECT LOOKING GLASS

This not about personal religious beliefs.

GOOD VS EVIL

[THEY] HAVE DAMAGED OR DESTROYED 2 LIVING GENERATIONS

[THEY] ARE EDOMITE CAANANITE'S CAANABLE GENEALOGY WW

[THEY] ARE TREASONOUS SATANIC NAZI JESUIT EVIL TRAITORS

WE_THE_PEOPLE_WILL_NEVER_EVER_FORGET_WHAT_THEY_DID

FAKE FALSE LYING MAINSTREAM MEDIA NEWS

WE THE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN DECEIVED AND BRAINWASHED WW

The World is WATCHING.

The World is CONNECTED.

EVERYTHING HAS MEANING.

SUICIDE WEEKEND.

SUICIDE WATCH.

GEORGE'S

BUSHES

CLINTONS

OBAMAS

POLOSIS

EVERGREEN SHIPPING_CONTAINERS CHILDREN TRAFFICKING

SOROS

ROTHSCHILDS

BARCELONA

COVID-19

MONKEY POX

EPSTEINS ISLAND

EPSTEINS BLACK BOOK

BLACKROCK

Anonymous ID: bd6f12 Oct. 7, 2022, 11:23 a.m. No.17662278   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17662165

The J6 Show Trial Is Lying About Election ‘Fraud’

 

Part 2 of 4

 

There are two major problems with Cheney’s argument. First, if she had read Clark’s letter, she would have noticed that while it did discuss major identified problems with the election potentially affecting the outcome, it never once alleged fraud. Second, it is highly debatable that the problems with the election were ever competently investigated or even understood.

 

If you look at the actual letter Clark drafted for discussion, he referenced “various irregularities,” “significant concerns that may have impacted the outcome of the election,” and “irregularities, sworn to by a variety of witnesses.” He referenced a report arising from Georgia Senate hearingsthat had taken sworn testimony and affidavits from many people about the chaotic and troubling administration of the Georgia election.

 

The complaints included problems with ballot custody, inability to monitor vote tabulation, inadequately maintained voter lists, and the counting of ballots from ineligible voters. The testimony even included something that would become a massive concern of election integrity advocates — the private takeover of government election offices by Mark Zuckerberg-funded groups.

 

And Georgia really was a mess, Fulton County in particular. None of Fulton County’s respected Republican election commissioners voted to certify the election. They had numerous problems, including that the first certification vote was taken just hours after Fulton County was still finding, processing, and tabulating ballots.

 

During the run-off, thumb drives were accidentally left in voting machines, exacerbating their previous concerns about ballot custody and chain of command issues. The commissioners also were concerned that no chain of custody information had been provided to them, even after they asked, for the 38 drop boxes spread throughout the country. The commissioners were concerned that no meaningful efforts had taken place to verify signatures on mail-in ballots.

 

It is false to claim that these things were properly investigated or that, if they were, there was no evidence to support them. Many independent analysts have determined that the Zuckerberg-funded takeover of government election offices significantly affected the outcome of the election.

 

That was where nearly $450 million was given — with a focus on the Democrat areas of swing states — to help run Get Out The Vote efforts. In an election that came down to 43,000 votes across three states, it is not difficult to make an overwhelming case that the Zuckerberg funding alone was outcome determinative.

 

It would have been difficult to properly investigate that in the short time period after the election, but it’s absolutely false to say it was investigated, much less thoroughly.

 

More Than 12,000 Illegal Votes In Georgia

 

Clark also expressed in his draft letter a “troubling” concern over a lawsuit that was being slow-tracked by a Georgia judge. He urged action because, “Despite the action having been filed on December 4, 2020, the trial court there has not even scheduled a hearing on matter, making it difficult for the judicial process to consider this evidence and resolve these matters on appeal prior to January 6.”

 

His concern was extremely well-founded. That lawsuit, widely regarded at the time as being strong and based on legitimate election problems, ended up being vindicated. In their lawsuit, the Trump campaign claimed that tens of thousands of voters had moved without registering to vote in their new residence. To get the figures about changes of address, the campaign looked at the National Change of Address data set, a secure data set of information on people who have filed a change of address with the United States Postal Service.

 

Filing a change-of-address form with the post office doesn’t conclusively mean the person is no longer eligible to vote at his or her former address. Some of those address changes could be college students or military members serving elsewhere. They would still be eligible to vote at the address they changed their mail from being delivered to.

 

https://thefederalist.com/2022/07/01/the-j6-show-trial-is-lying-about-election-fraud/