Anonymous ID: b1e9e8 Jan. 27, 2018, 2:43 a.m. No.177165   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7209 >>7281 >>7363 >>7392

>>176992

It was "GREAT AMERICAN SPIRIT" which is 21 characters (2 shown, 19 omitted) on Trump's post of 19 Dec:

twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/942551516564639744

The "Show the world our power" was supposedly about the superiority of our air force and ingenuity. The spaces lined up with the statement above.

 

This was another of Q proving he was legitimate and that he was close to 41020.

 

Is that enough, or do you need more explanation?

Anonymous ID: b1e9e8 Jan. 27, 2018, 4:01 a.m. No.177410   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7422 >>7423 >>7436 >>7499 >>7541 >>7592 >>7667

>>175503

<Note the last drops on the other board.

<Think logically.

<Refer to past crumbs.

<YOU HAVE MORE THAN YOU KNOW.

<Do you expect HRC, GS, Hussein, etc to stand in a PUBLIC courtroom w/ potential crooked judges and tainted โ€˜liberalโ€™ juries?

>How do you defuse a bomb?

>Knowledge of which wires/strings to cut?

>Q

 

This will delve into the top text above in Q's latest batch of posts. There is not much sauce, but there is a logical progression. Please bear with me. The numbers below are post numbers from GA. If you don't remember them from my descriptions, please open a tab to GA if you do not already have one open, for reference purposes.

 

>57 First Q link to 41020's speech where he lays out the plan we are now seeing unfold, including stating that nefarious types have taken over our government.

The above video is what I call "The Promise." This is where 41020 states how he is going to drain the swamp and also defines the swamp.

 

>58 Hussein has formally retained counsel.

I will refer back to this in a moment, below.

 

>59 Photo of a WH pen on WH stationery. The stationery is face down.

This signifies that 41020 has signed something (recently). I speculate that this is either an EO or other formal directive, which I will also explain below.

 

>60 Screen shot of Fox where we are accused of being Russian Bots. Text thanks F&F and asks "Coincidence?"

You should re-read the above to get everything that is in it. He is showing that the media (except Fox) is in the pocket of the cabal, and that the Internet Bill of Rights is needed to prevent the silencing of non-cabal voices. The AT&T references are saying that the NSA trusts AT&T (contract awarded) and that AT&T will be running the cabal-aligned sites/conglomerates.

 

This is not to say AT&T itself, but remember this was a monopoly that was broken up last century, just as the social media sites are being broken away from the Cabal's monolithic hold. It may actually be AT&T that runs them, but they will no longer be a single entity.

 

This post was NOT germane to the rest of the posts before an after, but it is important.

 

>61 Confirms Lurch's discussion telling the Palestinians not to go along with negotiations.

Lurch also reportedly "โ€ฆtold Agha that Trump would not be in office for long, suggesting he could be out in a year."

 

This last is the key. This is either a foreboding of impending doom to 41020 (threat of assassination), or it is a suggestion that Trump will be impeached.

 

The definition of sedition is: "Conduct or language inciting rebellion against the authority of a state." I think this applies in this case. Lurch is working directly against the foreign policy of the United States, which is the sole purview of the CinC, 41020.

 

>62 A repost of the EO for the blocking of persons for HR abuses and corruption.

This mainly deals with financial forfeiture. It is very broad in its language, allowing the financial blocking of all assets of anyone who did anything to push the Cabal's agenda.

 

On the surface, it was aimed at the CF, but its wording could apply to almost any of the cabal's dealings. Anyone complicit in the Cabal's plans falls under this EO and can have all of their assets seized.

 

>63 The Wiki page of the CFR

This is basically a list of many of the major players in the Cabal.

 

>64 The opinion of GWB's DOJ that any enemy combatant can be detained militarily, whether foreign or citizen.

This shows that it is not for the military to hold enemy combatants and therefore that it is for the civilian executive branch to do so.

 

Anyone who gives aid or support to an enemy falls under this provision as an enemy combatant, and it is therefore incumbent upon the Executive (41020) to detain them until they are no longer a threat to the Republic and/or hostilities cease.

 

>65 A repost of the Trump speech.

In this case, I call it "The Resolve."

 

  1. The promise.

 

  1. Hussein must have already had his assets blocked by the order above, as it states it will block the assets before letting the accused know this has happened. Hussein now has counsel, so he knows he is charged; therefore he has already been served/blocked.

 

  1. The order. I believe this is the order declaring the US is under attack by enemies foreign and domestic. Anyone aiding those attacking us are defined as enemy combatants by this EO.

 

  1. Unrelated.

 

  1. Lurch and Hussein are enemy combatants and subject to military detention.

 

  1. Everyone determined by the Executive to be enemy combatants (ECs) will have their assets blocked.

 

  1. The list. This may not be all of the ECs, and they may not all be ECs, but this is a short list of many of those who will be detained militarily.

 

  1. The authority for the above.

 

  1. The resolve. The promise will be kept.

 

Comments or arguments?

Anonymous ID: b1e9e8 Jan. 27, 2018, 4:50 a.m. No.177541   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7560

>>177410

>>177494

>>177495

>>177509

 

See my post above. Q was telling a story/pointing out the plan. I am soliciting criticism so I can refine it. I believe it is more right than wrong, though. See my (you) link herein.

 

No one is sleeping because they are starting the clean up, is my guess. The arrests are starting, so 41020 can proclaim it in the SoTU.

Anonymous ID: b1e9e8 Jan. 27, 2018, 5:14 a.m. No.177621   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7661

>>177604

No, the person (it was not me) stated that the Russian bots meme was a better red pill. She (yes, she doxed that) said you're welcome to keep doing the IBOR, even though she pointed out that Q did not specify that as a meme.

 

Just setting the record straight.

Anonymous ID: b1e9e8 Jan. 27, 2018, 5:21 a.m. No.177652   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7682

>>177638

I thought I said that he can.

 

"

Anyone who gives aid or support to an enemy falls under this provision as an enemy combatant, and it is therefore incumbent upon the Executive (41020) to detain them until they are no longer a threat to the Republic and/or hostilities cease."

Anonymous ID: b1e9e8 Jan. 27, 2018, 5:24 a.m. No.177662   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7705

>>177655

Frozen does not mean confiscated. If he signed them over to the Saudi Sovereign Wealth Fund, then they'd be released. Debt paid.

 

Go back to your mansion, Alwaleed. Never come out. Do not pass Go. Do not collect 200 Riyals.

Anonymous ID: b1e9e8 Jan. 27, 2018, 5:27 a.m. No.177669   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>177661

>It does NOT say push hashtag IBOR

 

I happen to agree that it does not say that. I don't care what hashtags you or anyone else pushes. I do almost no social media, and what I do, I do in my real name. I push a few #s, but not many.