Anonymous ID: 41d67b Nov. 2, 2022, 9:20 p.m. No.17720493   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0495 >>0496 >>0510

Tom says Mark Alias 'King of Election Lawyers' got BTFO trying to intervene in this important election law case in Illinois. kek

 

Dem Party FAILS in Judicial Watch Clean Election Lawsuit!

 

Judicial Watch

506K subscribers

2.4K Likes

13,045 views Premiered Nov 1, 2022

READ: https://www.judicialwatch.org/illinois-vote-counting/

 

A federal court rejected a motion by Democratic Party of Illinois to intervene as a defendant in Judicial Watch’s lawsuit challenging an Illinois election law permitting mail-in ballots to be received as long as two weeks after Election Day.

 

The ruling and opinion come in the federal lawsuit Judicial Watch filed on behalf of Congressman Mike Bost and two other registered Illinois voters to prevent state election officials from extending Election Day for 14 days beyond the date established by federal law (Rep.Michael J. Bost, Laura Pollastrini, and Susan Sweeney v. The Illinois State Board of Elections and Bernadette Matthews (No. 1:22-cv-02754)).

https://youtu.be/gYj2G7pqFAw

Anonymous ID: 41d67b Nov. 2, 2022, 9:24 p.m. No.17720495   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0496 >>0510

>>17720493

CTOBER 25, 2022

|

JUDICIAL WATCH

Judicial Watch: Court Rejects Democratic Party Intervention in Lawsuit Challenging Illinois Vote-Counting for Two Weeks after Election Day

 

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that a federal court rejected a motion by Democratic Party of Illinois to intervene as a defendant in Judicial Watch’s lawsuit challenging an Illinois election law permitting mail-in ballots to be received as long as two weeks after Election Day.

 

The ruling and opinion come in the federal lawsuit Judicial Watch filed on behalf of Congressman Mike Bost and two other registered Illinois voters to prevent state election officials from extending Election Day for 14 days beyond the date established by federal law (Rep.Michael J. Bost, Laura Pollastrini, and Susan Sweeney v. The Illinois State Board of Elections and Bernadette Matthews (No. 1:22-cv-02754)).

 

In the court’s ruling and opinion on the Democratic Party of Illinois motion to intervene, U.S. District Judge John F. Kness held that its participation would “delay this time-sensitive case:”

 

[Democratic Party of Illinois] cannot meet its burden to show that its interests will not be adequately represented by the parties to the case. As a result, [Democratic Party of Illinois] is not entitled to intervene as of right. Separately, because allowing [Democratic Party of Illinois] to intervene would threaten to delay this time-sensitive case further, the Court, in its discretion, denies [Democratic Party of Illinois] motion seeking permission to intervene as a party under Rule 24(b). Accordingly, the Court denies DPI’s motion in its entirety.

 

(The Democratic Party of Illinois is represented by the Elias Law Group, whose founding partner is Marc Elias, the controversial lawyer for Hillary Clinton’s campaign.)

 

Federal law defines Election Day as “the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of every even-numbered year.” The initial complaint states:

 

Despite Congress’ clear statement regarding a single national Election Day, Illinois has expanded Election Day by extending by 14 days the date for receipt and counting of vote-by-mail ballots

 

Judicial Watch points out that the current Illinois election law allows vote-by-mail ballots received up to 14 days “after the polls close on Election Day” to be counted as if they were cast and received on or before Election Day. Illinois law also provides that “[e]ven vote-by-mail ballots without postmarks shall be counted if received up to 14 calendar days after Election Day if the ballots are dated on or before Election Day.”

 

(cont…)

 

https://www.judicialwatch.org/illinois-vote-counting/

Anonymous ID: 41d67b Nov. 2, 2022, 9:24 p.m. No.17720496   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0510

>>17720493

>>17720495

(cont…)

 

Judicial Watch’s lawsuit notes:

 

The Board … advised that the number of ballots received after Election Day through November 17, 2020, could materially affect the unofficial election results.

 

***

 

[Illinois’ own data indicates that] Illinois received 266,417 vote-by-mail ballots statewide during the period from November 3rd through November 17th.

 

***

 

[M]ost of the 266,417 vote-by-mail ballots were received after Election Day, which would mean that as many as 4.4% of votes cast in 2020 were received after Election Day. [Emphasis in original]

 

Judicial Watch argues that holding voting open for 14 days past Election Day violates the constitutional rights of voters and candidates:

 

By counting untimely and illegal ballots received after Election Day and diluting Plaintiffs’ timely cast and received ballots, Defendants, acting under color of Illinois law, have deprived and are depriving Plaintiffs of rights protected under the First Amendment and 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

 

“The Democratic Party failed to gum up this important lawsuit for election integrity,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “We are supposed to have an Election Day, not Election Weeks – or months. Illinois’ 14-day extension of Election Day beyond the date set by Congress is illegal, violates the civil rights of voters, and encourages fraud.”

 

The Delaware Supreme Court recently struck down the state’s vote-by-mail and same-day voter registration statutes for violating the Delaware Constitution. In making its ruling, the court effectively concurs with the amicus curiae brief Judicial Watch submitted in the case, which argues the Delaware statute impermissibly expands those practices far beyond the limits set in the Delaware Constitution.

 

In a separate Judicial Watch election lawsuit against Illinois, a federal court ruled in June 2021 that the lawsuit could proceed against Illinois officials for denying public access to Illinois’ voter registration database.

 

In February 2022, Judicial Watch settled its voter rolls clean-up lawsuit against North Carolina and two of its counties after the North Carolina removed over 430,000 ineligible names from the voter rolls.

 

In March 2022, a Maryland court ruled in favor of Judicial Watch’s challenge to Maryland’s Democratic legislature “extreme” congressional redistricting gerrymander.

 

For more than 25 years, Judicial Watch has been known for its aggressive, leading-edge use of public records laws and lawsuits, as well as taxpayer, civil rights and whistleblower protection litigation to fight government corruption. Judicial Watch is a national leader in voting integrity and voting rights. As part of this effort, Judicial Watch assembled a team of highly experienced voting rights attorneys who stopped discriminatory elections in Hawaii, and cleaned up voter rolls in California, Ohio, Indiana, and Kentucky, among other achievements.

 

Christine Svenson, Esq., of Svenson Law Offices in Palatine, Illinois, is assisting Judicial Watch with the lawsuit.

 

###

 

https://www.judicialwatch.org/illinois-vote-counting/

Anonymous ID: 41d67b Nov. 2, 2022, 9:31 p.m. No.17720498   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0510

Society of Professional Journalists Caught Lying About Reason Veritas was EJECTED From MediaFest '22

 

Project Veritas

1.55M subscribers

9.8K Likes

41,400 views Nov 2, 2022

BUSTED: Society of Professional Journalists Caught in Lie Claiming Failure to Receive 'Payment' Was Reason Project Veritas was EJECTED From MediaFest '22

 

"We have received complaints."

 

"It involves our code of ethics."

 

https://youtu.be/PgnmaVfI2i8

Anonymous ID: 41d67b Nov. 2, 2022, 9:34 p.m. No.17720499   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0500 >>0510

>>17720497

DONALD J. TRUMP

45th President of the United States: 2017 ‐ 2021

Fact Sheet - President Donald J. Trump Is Reducing The Cost Of Insulin And Improving Healthcare For Our Nation's Seniors

May 26, 2020

No effort will be spared to give America's seniors the care and support and devotion and love they have earned and that they deserve. –President Donald J. Trump

LOWERING COST OF INSULIN FOR SENIORS: President Donald J. Trump and his Administration are lowering out-of-pocket insulin costs for Medicare's seniors.

 

Under President Trump's leadership, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is announcing that many Medicare Part D plans and Medicare Advantage plans have applied to offer lower out-of-pocket insulin costs to seniors for the 2021 plan year.

Across the Nation, participating enhanced Part D plans will provide many seniors with Medicare access to a broad set of insulins at a maximum $35 copay for a month's supply of each type of insulin.

In 2018, Medicare Part D also started covering newer insulin delivery devices, including both mechanical and electronic insulin pumps that are not covered under Part B.

Lowering out-of-pocket insulin costs will provide the many Medicare beneficiaries who rely on one or more common forms of insulin with plan options that will deliver critical relief.

IMPROVING CARE AND COST FOR SENIORS: President Trump is working to improve the accessibility, quality, and affordability of healthcare and prescription drugs for our Nation's seniors.

 

President Trump is committed to ensuring that older Americans receive the best quality healthcare at an affordable price.

Just last year, the President signed an Executive Order to empower seniors with more choice and access in healthcare and improve the fiscal sustainability of Medicare.

This order will eliminate unnecessary barriers and combat fraud, waste, and abuse in Medicare, improving the program and maximizing freedom for patients and providers.

Average basic premiums for Medicare Part D prescription drug plans are the lowest in 7 years and have fallen by 13.5 percent since 2017, saving beneficiaries $1.9 billion in premium costs.

Medicare Advantage premiums have also fallen 28 percent since 2017 to a 13-year low.

President Trump is committed to lowering the prices of prescription drugs for all Americans and has repeatedly called on Congress to act.

PROTECTING SENIORS DURING A PANDEMIC: President Trump is ensuring that our Nation's seniors remain safe and have access to healthcare resources during the coronavirus pandemic.

 

President Trump has released his "Opening Up America Again" guidelines, which include instructions for States to take additional measures to protect the safety of senior citizens.

The Trump Administration has made it easier for America's seniors to be tested for coronavirus while ensuring they are not burdened by the costs of these services.

Early in the outbreak, President Trump acted to dramatically expand Medicare telehealth coverage, ensuring seniors could access healthcare services from the safety of their own home.

The President has taken steps to improve the safety of our Nation's nursing homes, including creating the Coronavirus Commission for Safety and Quality in Nursing Homes.

The Administration announced nearly $1 billion to support the needs of older Americans during the crisis, including home-delivered meals, in-home care services, and more.

Federal agencies are studying the effects of coronavirus on vulnerable populations and are working to improve the responsiveness of our healthcare system.

Donald J. Trump, Fact Sheet - President Donald J. Trump Is Reducing The Cost Of Insulin And Improving Healthcare For Our Nation's Seniors Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/341873

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-reducing-the-cost-insulin-and-improving-healthcare-for

Anonymous ID: 41d67b Nov. 2, 2022, 9:38 p.m. No.17720500   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0510

>>17720497

>>17720499

Biden Freezes Trump Rule Aimed At Lowering Insulin, EpiPen Prices

BY: TRISTAN JUSTICE

JANUARY 24, 2021

2 MIN READ

President Joe Biden froze a December rule signed by President Donald Trump aimed at lowering prescription drug prices for insulin.

 

President Joe Biden froze a December rule signed by President Donald Trump aimed at lowering prescription drug prices for insulin and epinephrine.

 

On Thursday, Biden’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced the new rule would be put on hold, along with several other Trump-era orders pending a 60-day review. Biden Chief of Staff Ron Klain directed federal agencies on Wednesday to pause orders that had been signed and published by the previous administration but not yet effective.

 

“This freeze is part of the Biden administration’s large-scale effort announced this week that will scrutinize the Trump administration’s health policies,” reported Bloomberg Law. “If the previous administration’s policies raise ‘fact, law, or policy’ concerns, the Biden HHS will delay them and consult with the Office of Management and Budget about other actions.”

 

In December, Trump ordered community health centers deliver savings and discounts to low-income patients to purchase insulin and epinephrine in a bid to make high drug costs more affordable. The rule’s implementation will now be delayed until March 22 pending its approval by the new administration.

 

Biden’s first days in office have been defined by a series of sweeping executive orders showcasing the Biden-Harris White House’s aggressive pursuit of a partisan leftist agenda. Among the 17 executive orders signed in his first 48 hours, Biden has so far effectively erased women’s sports, blocked Trump’s border wall, suspended federal laws f0r illegal immigrants, and pulled back rules barring taxpayer-funded abortion.

 

https://thefederalist.com/2021/01/24/biden-freezes-trump-rule-aimed-at-lowering-insulin-epipen-prices/

Anonymous ID: 41d67b Nov. 2, 2022, 10:07 p.m. No.17720508   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0510

As usual a really good job thouroughly going through the docs with legal commentary.

 

Paul Pelosi David Depape Criminal Charges; CISA's Leaked Meeting Minutes; SCOTUS Affirmative Action

 

Robert Gouveia Esq.

210K subscribers

2.9K Likes

46K views Streamed 2 days ago

https://youtu.be/R7MICnOuOkA