Anonymous ID: ca27f3 Nov. 4, 2022, 5:12 p.m. No.17721808   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17721785

SINGAPORE (June 3, 2016) Secretary of Defense Ash Carter poses for a photo with Sen. John McCain, Sen. Tom Cotton, Sen. Lindsey Graham, Sen. Joni Ernst, Sen. Cory Gardner, and Sen. Daniel Sullivan in Singapore, June 3, 2016. Carter is in Singapore attending the 15th International Institute for Strategic Studies Asia Security Summit.

Anonymous ID: ca27f3 Nov. 4, 2022, 6:04 p.m. No.17721844   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1847

>>17721679

just a blast from the past 2016

 

For Election Day Influence, Twitter Ruled Social Media

 

t around 5 a.m. Tuesday on the East Coast, the first signs of presidential chatter started stirring on Twitter, then quickly began to mushroom.

 

In the ensuing hours, Twitter’s 100 or so staff members working on the company’s Election Day efforts woke up and started dialing super PACs and advocacy groups to place last-minute ads in swing states. By 11 a.m., 27,000 election-related posts were swirling across the network every minute.

 

The volume of activity was set to soar throughout the evening and overnight, as polls closed and the results of the race between Hillary Clinton and Donald J. Trump came in. Twitter, meanwhile, worked to promote itself as an election destination, using live video streams with partners like BuzzFeed News, in what was set to become one of the social media service’s busiest days.

 

Forget about Snapchat and set aside YouTube, Facebook and Instagram. For all the bluster over the last year about which social media network would dominate the election, 2016 was no different from years past: It was another Twitter moment. From the first presidential debate in September until Monday morning, a staggering one billion-plus election-related posts raced across the network.

 

Election Day was a reminder of Twitter’s influence in media and the distribution of information. While the company is a constant target of Wall Street disparagement for its relatively paltry 317 million monthly users, the site was a go-to for conversation and breaking news about voting activity, malfunctions and results — with the not-so-periodic joke thrown in. By 10 p.m., 40 million posts had been sent about the election, exceeding the 31 million sent on Election Day 2012.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/09/technology/for-election-day-chatter-twitter-ruled-social-media.html

Anonymous ID: ca27f3 Nov. 4, 2022, 6:10 p.m. No.17721853   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17721847

just been wondering if the loss in advertising revenue from corporations was a form of "loop capital" that the corps were getting from Uncle Sugar in exchange for the election coverage for "their" guy/gal?