>>1773239

I 100% agree with you on this. I shouldn't have to make a cake for faggots if I don't want to. Faggots should get cakes made by faggot bakers if they want a faggy cake.

How is this any different re: Twitter? This whole "Internet Bill of Rights", methinks, has been interpreted very wrongly, in some ways, by anons. Unless the government steps and and decides that Facebook, Twitter, Google, and Instagram are now considered "utilities", and they pay the owners a very handsome royalty for their troubles, no judge or legislator or executive branch member should be able to tell them what they HAVE TO ALLOW on their platforms.

I'm sorry, I simply disagree with most anons on this. I have a feeling there are more out there that agree with me, but are afraid to say anything.

>>1773364

WHOA.

>>1773427

GJ. This is DEFINITELY a notable. Leaving the corrupted Stated Dept. up to investigating itself for being a bunch of dipshits. Now THAT's what I call corruption.

>>1773479

Yeah, still can't figure out if:

1. This is definitely him?

2. If so, where the fuck was this guy in the state department?

3. Another possibility; was he working for another state (nation) like Pakistan?

Regardless, the Obama and Pakistan connection is solid. Even Obama's past lovers affirmed that he seemed more connected to all those pakifags more than themselves:

https://www. washingtonpost. com/blogs/the-fix/post/ex-girlfriend-genevieve-cooks-journal-featured-in-new-obama-biography/2012/05/02/gIQADRGcwT_blog.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.3f6561d98c6e

So, the question remains, how does the butt-buddy in the photo relate to Q's statements about Obama's administration, FBI sec clearance bypass, etc?