If you are trying to argue that the recent (this year) tripcode Q is fake, why does your image show a case where Q posted "non Q" posts and then "revealed" that he is Q?
Doesn't this undermine your point?
test
>i didnt say anything about tripcodes
If you are casting doubt on Q posts that cognoscenti regard as "official" then you are doing that implicitly.
>i'm not trying to argue anything
If you are purporting to make claims grounded in reason then you are arguing.
>i dont care what you believe
But here you are.
>i dont think you should care what i believe
There is a good chance you are actually Q team, and this is all performance.
>if you dont know that animefag was ron and gets are stolen by admins we are not the same
Ron and Jim are both much more part of this op than was evident to start.
The Q post with animefag (Q161) is a pretty important one IMO.
>There's no end to what's real and what's fake.
True.
>Either way, what do you do?
It depends on which way.
>What will you leave behind in this moment?
This post.
>Real or fake, what you do is the same.
Not how I roll.
>Nothing new?
No, there's a lot new all the time.
>You make me laugh.
I try.
>Then make one.
One what?
Why not more?
>Bystander
Covfefe.
>>>17730759
>What would it take to expand this movement as fast as possible?
Real bewbs.