>>1776125

This^^^^

There's way too much chatter about this subject to no purpose except to mold up the bread. Can we just agree to SPOILER naked stuff? Post the TY Baker or all cute butts and tits you want, but SPOILER it to give people a choice.

Naked girls (or boys…) have nothing to do with the actual mission. The rest of infinitechan is available for that stuff. This is where Q landed, and we have a mission that will eventually bring Normies en masse. SPOILERs are not censorship. Respect. If it's NAKED, SPOILER it. Maybe BO/BV could help here if peeps forget.

>>1776214

I could agree with you except that there's no way to filter it until AFTER you've looked at it…

Capisce? Not a choice.

You sound like (((MSM))) with your "If you don't like it, don't watch it!" garbage. I canceled my Cable TV subscription to get away from their (((programming))). This is more of the same.

SPOILERs are not (((censorship)))

>>1776260

Anonymity just means no one knows who you are. It doesn't mean there are no consequences to what you do. Like the "Muh Dick" guy? Filter his garbage? How? Anons who "get it" can still post anything they want, but if it's known to be annoying or detrimental, reasonable adults can exercise "self" control and respect that others may not want to see the images. Self-control is not (((censorship))). If you are being DELIBERATELY Offensive, then, by all means post all the naked pics, but realize that you are putting yourself in the "Muh Dick" guy's class when you do it.

>>1776336

I understand drinking adrenochrome has much the same effect…

>>1776355

Not my point.

>>1776217

Not virtue signaling. Trying to improve the signal to noise ratio. When's the last time Q posted a naked chick? Ever ask us to find out what the best kind of tits are? Post your best naked chick memes? Focus. Never said you can't post what you want. Just suggested serious posters will SPOILER naked stuff. Why is that a problem?