ok, so what's the news today?

that the Ukrainian based ex-soviet spy-apparatus/aristocratic marxists funded the . . . through laundering money through a crypto exchange that suddenly went bankrupt?

any Liberals (shill who post here) want to explain this away?

It's ok for 3rd generation marxist ukrainian spy-kid prostitute child pedo-blackmailers to help Democrats because ? ? ?

if this news is real it should be Democrats and Unionists who arrive at the offices of democrats and demand explanations.

but is it real or just more psyop?

Ukraine and the tri-citizen mafias are clearly related.

was Ukraine were all the people captured by pirates in the middle ages were eventually shipped off to live there?

It's not Ukraine or Ukrainians, but a criminal aristocracy that teaches their children that they are 'victims' of 'systemic racism' so no psychopathic act is off limits for them to get 'racial / social' equity?

these are notes, and conjecture, and not opinion.

>>17774167

shows it clearly.

TY for showing this.

>>17774172

the privileged victim wonder kin of the spies from the ex soviet are like ticks who run the show everywhere, it seems.

>>17774175

but not before he impoverishes anyone with a retail business . . .

>>17774181

two 'go to the head of the class' bait boy spy kid children?

>>17774201

go to the Rightside page and they always have info on when President Trump speaks.

https://rsbnetwork.com/

>>17774222

because marxists aren't jews?

what is he then?

his parents were accademics festered in at a State College (some call them parasites when they job-for-life at a state instittution.

and he has ethnic names that seem to be jewish?

so then you shame scold someone for saying 'what he is'

I'll tell you what I think he is: a suspect.

and there needs to be an investigation.

how about DNA tests for all public employees to find out their real lineages and which country sent their parents to the USA as spies?

but no, no one can know their geneology or real origin.

and if you say that they are one thing you're probably wrong.

what you could say is 'they used to impersonate that type'

>>17774255

just stop.

I'm not an enemy of the Jews, anon.

PS: you don't know you're own history.

I've studied history and know a lot more than your gloss shows.

over 2 thousand years there have been very many different communities of Jews and you do not know them all.

and they don't all agree with each other, and they are all independant.

you're obviously here to try and farm opinion or frame the people here.

tell me about Cypress, anon.

Weren't the Jews there too?

but which Jews.

when were they there?

what did they do there?

>>17774275

my conjecture is about 'spy kids'

and Jews are people.

some might be Marsist.

some Marxists might be spy kids.

some Marixsts might pretend to be Jews.

others were and converted.

the idiocy is you shilling against anyone who puts a nominative in a conjeture that might be considered Jewish.

it only makes you look bad because you seem obcessed.

I'm still interested if you know real history.

you didn't answer my question from my other post so I know you're an ignorant person.

unto two or three generations, anon.

so stuff that happened in antiquity can't be held against the descendants of those people then, in the modern day.

but without a blame game to play you have nothing.

Learn History and stop being a fool

>>17774293

you might find that at rightside they still have a link to the video. the link has already been posted in this bread. Go there and look for the Florida rally from a a few weeks back.

>>17774295

I think you're showing yourself as not being one, anon.

As I said, learn History.

we have a right to make conjecture, even if it's far fetched, without being badgered by someone who pretends to represent 5 % of Humanity for all time . . .

so back into your cave, anon.

there are other people who really do hate and act out. Shouldn't you be looking for them?

if you know about me you know that I'm not an issue for you.

Except that I dare to make conjecture and say 'this isn't true, or if it were, we couldn't really know'

so whatever, you don't get paid unless you do your badger troll thing? so . . . I don't want you to go hungry.

>>17774314

now it does (I say it because it's a bot, most likely) just uses vauge accusatory 'you are never good enough' badger methods, like a bad parent who publicly scolds their child.

>>17774327

reverts to a 2nd grade approach.

misquote a previous post

stops pretending to be someone with reason who just trying to out the real haters.

>>17774338

the obvious punch line, but it's rather hateful is . . .

oh, it's too hateful so I won't post it.

but seriously, stop.

when your overlords review your work here today they won't be impressed with your efforts.

>>17774353

spaced out and sputtering threats and accusatory nominative clauses it diverts into an ad hominum attack as if there are blanket accusations implied through it's terseness, with lines from old movies where they use the term 'copper' to speak of police officers, reaching back into the depths of lost time.

seriously out of it's league it doesn't know how to cut bait.

it pretends that it's effort has a punative effect, that it's very ideas are reason enough for something . . . that it can't ever say what it is.

it would love to be in charge, and revels in a depraved mindset.

it's main method is constant 'we got ya know' one liners, stock comic book text, or written out in old sci fi that is fed into a word processor.

or it's a real person but completely just wasting it's time.