Voter ID and paper ballots. Neat idea, but if he's not in office how's that going to happen?
100%
That seems to be the size of it.
There's this still…. maybe it has a chance of being heard.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
This action is against 388 federal officers in their official
capacities which include President Joseph Robinette Biden
Jr, Vice President Kamala Harris, Speaker of the House
Nancy Pelosi and former Vice President Michael Richard
Pence (“Respondents”). All the Respondents have taken the
required Oath to support and defend the Constitution of the
United States of America against all enemies, foreign and
domestic, and as such they are liable for consequences
when they violate the Oath of Office.
Respondents were properly warned and were requested to
make an investigation into a highly covert swift and
powerful enemy, as stated below, seeking to destroy the
Constitution and the United States,
purposely thwarted all efforts to investigate this,
whereupon this enemy was not checked or investigated,
therefore the Respondents adhered to this enemy. Because
of Respondents intentional refusal to investigate this
enemy, Petitioner Raland J Brunson (“Brunson”) brought
this action against Respondents because he was seriously
personally damaged and violated by this action of
Respondents, and consequently this action unilaterally
violated the rights of every citizen of the U.S.A. and
perhaps the rights of every person living, and all courts of
law.
On January 6, 2021, the 117th Congress held a proceeding
and debate in Washington DC (“Proceeding”).
Proceeding was for the purpose of counting votes under the
2020 Presidential election for the President and Vice
President of the United States under Amendment XII.
During this Proceeding over 100 members of U.S. Congress
claimed factual evidence that the said election was rigged.
The refusal of the Respondents to investigate this
congressional claim (the enemy) is an act of treason and
This
4
fraud by Respondents. A successfully rigged election has
the same end result as an act of war; to place into power
whom the victor wants, which in this case is Biden, who, if
not stopped immediately, will continue to destroy the
fundamental freedoms of Brunson and all U.S. Citizens and
courts of law.
Due to the fact that this case represents a national security
breach on a unprecedented level like never before seen
seriously damaging and violating Brunson and coincidently
effects every citizen of the U.S.A. and courts of law.
Therefore, Brunson moves this court to grant this petition,
or in the alternative without continuing further, order the
trial court to grant Brunson’s complaint in its fullest.
Brunson’s complaint is the mechanism that can
immediately remove the Respondents from office without
leaving this country vulnerable without a President and
Vice President.
Despite the grave importance of this case, the trial court
granted Respondents motion to dismiss (“Motion”) by
stating “IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff
Raland Brunson’s action is dismissed without prejudice”.
(“Order”) This Order followed the trial court’s order to
adopt its report and recommendation that Brunson did not
get until close to the beginning of Oct. 2022 thus
prejudicing Brunson from timely filing any objections, and
the Order did not properly address Brunson’s opposition to
the Motion. Brunson’s opposition clearly shows that
Brunson has standing.