>>17786127
>Speaking for muhself -
>Healthy ego is good. Ego in service to something beyond itself.
Agreed, and we're probably just battling a gorillion changes to definition.
Anecdotal related to ego:
Anon has been dealing with contractor that anon is trying to help.
Contractor gets completely butthurt about thought of dragging home supplies and having to help unload instead of watching someone else do it, even if that means having to sit at the job site all damn day for an 8-8 open delivery window.
Guy needs his fix of watching other people to do stuff for him even if it means spending a hundred bucks and committing 12 hours of time to a half hour of work.
Maybe egocentric would have been best word?
Trying to define evil (and the tardedness it creates) is hard, because evil always changes definitions.