>>17787810 (pb)
It has something to do with keeping the spam-bot away. Messes up it's algorithm by not having set bread lengths. It seems to be working so I'm not bitching just wish they'd explain it so people aren't hanging in old stale bread.
Nope, the Danchenko trial was the end of Durham saga. Durham is officially a swamp creature at this point.
The first one to reach across the isle and backhand someone is my hero.
What has started, please be specific because I'm not seeing anything on my end.
Yup, he's going to be indicted/arrested and then he'll wind up (somewhere) and then the public will (DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING).
shitposting? The first arrest was always assumed, if not HRC, then DJT. Most assumed he'd be indicted/arrested to piss off/demoralize his voting base. The military isn't going to save him, anons aren't going to rush in guns blazing and save him. RepComs aren't going to stand up for him so what do people think will happen?
It's all a demoralization game, it's intentionally designed to build up hopium and them flop us on our faces repeatedly and it's worked pretty well.
Oddly a true statement.
I'm retired military, I'm public offline, friends/family/neighbors strangers in the checkout line but not on the internet.
First, that scene is f'ing hillarious, 2nd, in all fairness, any post that doesn't contain a cited source, link or dig regarding news or a Q post can be quantified as a shill/slide etc or the occasional pissed of anon just venting to his peeps.
If the world was fair, the majority of Congress would be standing in a gallows holding the honor of dropping them for anons.
Life isn't fair.
They did 'detain her' but let her go 'sum of all fears' if I remember correctly, a reference to a threat of nuclear which we know the deepstate has.