>>17787907

Sorry for the typos. Busy.2022

I've blacked out the voter's first last/name, but left the voter ID number.

These records come from multiple files directly from the SOS office, I did not include those unique file numbers.

So what you're looking at on the left side. One column lists absentee ballot requests that were requested over the internet (i.e. no signature), but later the request was deleted. (Hiding footprints.)

The next column - all those voters had been mailed ballots. NONE of those ballots had been recorded as having been mailed back to the clerk's office at the time the records were deleted. It is unknown what the clerk's office did with the ballots.

A public confrontation during certification did not resolve the question.

I was also looking to see what their previous pattern of voting was (the part on the right side).

Something new I found while working on this….

Normally, the final report from the SOS that includes election day voters (and absentee ballots that are returned between Sat 7 p.m. and Election Day 7 p.m.) indicates the actual tabulator location where the ballot was tabulated (run thru a Dominion machine). I totally missed in 2020 that over 4800 voters had no location indicated. It's on my list of things to audit…….

Audi anon….

>>17787927

Sounds like a line from 2010, the sequel to 2001: A Space Odyssey

>>17787907

Baker,

Other anons auditing elections need to know this. They need to tie the election irregularities directly to ballots, the clerk's reconcilliation sheets (which must be accurate), and the county commissioner certification meetings.

Errors and Ommissions during certification !!

>>17787958

Actually, this anon is dead serious and has gone PUBLIC with this information. Name and all.

>>17787950

I also interviewed 2 of these voters without letting them know why I stopped by to say hello. These two voters confirmed:

1 - they requested the ballot

2 - they received the ballot

3 - they mailed the ballots back PRIOR TO the date their records were deleted.

4 - they mailed the ballots back from the local post office, about 6 blocks away from the clerk's office

Current status of their ballot unknown. I created a MAJOR SHITSTORM when I went public.

Clerk's office in hot water for certifying inaccurate results, OR they scrambled to fabricate.

lol - ELECTRONIC FOOTPRINTS…

This is just a small part. More coming I couldn't post on QR in real time due to the captcha thing.

I did meet w/ our new sheriff (major anti-public corruption guy, proven in the past), and former public corruption prosecutor. They are eyes on also.

Will search for a few others that I can post.

>>17787950

The file number in yellow is the SOS file number (unique serial number) sent to me at 6:02 a.m. on 11/08/2022 from SOS office.

(Before the last day of voting)

This is the bottom line of the audit at that point in time.

>>17788011

I know one other county besides me caught this in the Primary. I'll have to ask what county.

I know my initial report after the 10/26 deletion was sent up the ladder.

Also a US Congresswoman received my initial report early on, as well as my final report post election.

>>17788011

A person from Hobbs was definitely in the loop. Had to double check the address.

As were several others in other counties.

I reached out to others to show/explain what to look for.

Will they do anyting in time to prevent certifications? I hold no illusions.

There's more than one way.

Meeting w/ a former Fed (not FBI) investigator. I need a critical thinker to play devil's advocte on working theories of why "they" would delete these records, and how it fits in the ballot mules.

>>17788107

OK will do. I have a couple partial days with some down time before the next big audit