Anonymous ID: cf6153 Nov. 20, 2022, 12:10 a.m. No.17794891   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4896 >>4972 >>5237 >>5707 >>5895

>>17794880

> sane military

>Clot shotted everyone in uniform

>Left behind loads of technology and material in Afghanistan

>Crashes naval ships on the regular

>Focuses on educating soldiers on intersectionality and all other Critical Race Theory woke nonsense

>allows the citizenry that makes up its pool of potential recruits to become enfeebled through GMOs and brain rot to the point it has trouble refilling the ranks

>invests in little to no cyber defense for the homeland resulting in critical systems constantly being besieged by ransomware

>Milley makes calls to China behind the President's back to let them know he stands with them

>sane military

>sane military

>sane military

Anonymous ID: cf6153 Nov. 20, 2022, 1:20 a.m. No.17794947   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5537 >>6112 >>6121

New York Post is going to have a schizophrenic meltdown in the coming years. On one hand they have to serve the new "powers that be" directive of ditching Trump and supporting DeSantis or anyone else with an (R) next to their name to be the new face of the GOP, but on the other hand, they still employ Michael Goodwin and Miranda DeVine who are Trump supporters and their most famous columnists. In Goodwin's late Saturday night, early Sunday morning opinion piece he astutely says AG Garland is full of shit on his independent special counsel nonsense about investigating Trump. Goodwin mentions Trump by name in the article.

>https://nypost.com/2022/11/19/ag-garland-is-the-great-pretender-for-his-trump-special-counsel-appointment/

 

Compare that to the "the powers that be" propaganda spewing editorial board's late Saturday night, early Sunday morning piece which criticizes Biden's WH as politicizing the branches of government but not once does it mention Trump being persecuted. How the hell can you write an article criticizing the Biden alphabet agencies unfairly bringing using politics as the basis for all of it's actions, and reference Garland and the DOJ being too political, but not mention Trump?

>https://nypost.com/2022/11/19/bidens-white-house-literally-could-not-be-more-political/

 

NY Post top brass (NewsCorp/Murdoch brothers) wants Trump erased, but with DeVine and Goodwin still writing for them, it's going to be difficult to hide Trump from their readers.

Anonymous ID: cf6153 Nov. 20, 2022, 1:25 a.m. No.17794952   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5928

>>17794941

>>17794944

>keep larger images while reducing the file size

 

I use a free program called handbrake

Here's a tutorial.

http://blogs.it.ox.ac.uk/adamweblearn/2013/10/how-to-compress-large-video-files-without-losing-quality-using-handbrake/

It seems very intimidating, but it's not once you do it two or three times it becomes second nature

Anonymous ID: cf6153 Nov. 20, 2022, 1:56 a.m. No.17794980   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17794963

The "cheapest" way to control a bot army is with the click farm method. A bunch of phones hooked up in front of some poor Chinese soul who individually clicks on the screens in front of them to increase like counts or vote in polls or whatever is needed. It's a shitty job, but someone has to do it.

 

The more "expensive" way, would be some sort of super computer, that is capable of hosting or spoofing multiple phones and programed to influence likes or polls. This sort of technology I imagine is only accessible to the rich and government actors. As we know from the Twitter whistleblower, intelligence agencies from all around the world run ops on Twitter, so I'm sure they do this.

Anonymous ID: cf6153 Nov. 20, 2022, 1:58 a.m. No.17794981   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>17794963

The "cheapest" way to control a bot army is with the click farm method. A bunch of phones hooked up in front of some poor Chinese soul who individually clicks on the screens in front of them to increase like counts or vote in polls or whatever is needed. It's a shitty job, but someone has to do it.

 

The more "expensive" way, would be some sort of super computer, that is capable of hosting or spoofing multiple phones and programed to influence likes or polls. This sort of technology I imagine is only accessible to the rich and government actors. As we know from the Twitter whistleblower, intelligence agencies from all around the world run ops on Twitter, so I'm sure they do this.