Please help me to understand Trump endorsing the vaccines

I'm really trying to figure all this our and struggling. We know that Trump never says anything that's untrue, so in light of that I want to posit a theory as shown below. I know this will be unpopular but just as a thought experiment I want it to be known.

Personally, I haven't taken the vax or any test, but what I've noticed is that I haven't seen ay significant vaccine injuries myself, and almost everyone I know has taken a vax. It got me to thinking that Trump hasn't ever made a statement that is untrue. If this is the case, could the vax fear be pushed by the "bad guys" in order to keep us all emotionally stressed out and unable to advance in other regards? I've found it impossible to care about the election, or anything really, while worrying about the vax, and whether or not I'll ever find a woman who is unvaxxed. Strategically speaking, this has completely sidelined my life both personally and politically. I can't help but put all these pieces together. Did the good guys ensure the vax was safe? Did they replace the vax with saline? Could it really be bad guys pushing the vax-is-poison narrative because they know it will sideline people like me?

I'm a pattern recognition anon here from the very beginning. Decades on the chans. I can't help but see this pattern and I submit it here to you to consider. I am in no way a proponent of the vax and I would never suggest anyone get it, but I pray to God that there be an antidote if it is as bad as I've been thinking. To me it seems that it is the worst possible thing that could've happened if it is bad…

The reason nuclear war is bad, and nuclear material, is because it corrupts DNA… if the vaccine is actually as bad as feared, then it is worse than open nuclear war… Maybe the good guys thought open nuclear war would've been worse and this is somehow better? But Trump has not come out and suggested the vaccine is bad. Maybe because given the two options, the vaccine is at the very least "better."

I don't know, and would appreciate feedback.

God Bless.

>>17805534

I also want to specify that I don't even know for sure what is IN the vaccine. To outright believe it is mRNA is to believe the lying companies themselves. Archbishop Vigano has suggested it is graphene oxide. Evil talking heads that are really blatant pied pipers have suggested it is snake venom, or other similar ridiculous things. Why would bad actors want us preoccupied with this fear? Why did Trump, a good guy, suggest it was OK and safe?

God please help us to learn.

>>17805534

I also want to add that psychologically speaking, the fear of heart attacks, strokes, and especially infertility strike directly at what we fear the most. This accurate of a targeting makes me thinking it is a psyop to be so scared. I have personally known multiple people who have had kids and had no issues since getting the vax.

I know what I'm suggesting probably reads as bullshit shilling, but please help me in my thought experiment here. I HAVE to figure out whats in it, and if people that took it will be ok.

>>17805534

>>17805550

ATTENTION BAKER

The individual spamming "me me me" posts began directly after the first thought experiment post I made. PLEASE NOTE THIS TIMING SO OTHERS MAY SEE.

God Bless.

>>17805566

God Bless you anon, and our digits are great.

>>17805584

For a long time my personal take on this was that under Trump, the vaccines were OPTIONAL. As in, the military didn't come door to door or set up roadblocks to force this on us all.

But the longer time goes on, it just seems like too many innocent people that didn't know better would die if this were the case. Thus I think the most likely scenarios are thus:

1. The good guys switched out the bad stuff/the vaccines are actually safe somehow. Maybe they only had histamines in them to simulate mild reactions at worst.

1. The vaccines are as bad as we fear and the least terrible option for Trump was to allow them to roll them out but keep things "optional," without the military forcing them on people. In this scenario, people create their fate. This is VERY bad.

1. Mixed batches. Good guys saved most but some got through. This doesn't make so much sense to me though because of how effective we know the military can be. I feel like this is an "all or nothing" scenario.

1. There is an antidote to the vaccines. Vitamin D, omega 3, SOMETHING we haven't found yet that eats up the fibrous clots. Is it graphene oxide in there? We just don't know for sure what the hell is in them.

It seems off to me that bad actors would be pumping the gas on the vaccines being bad. This helps to keep people like me on edge and unable to think clearly. How can I care about messed up elections when everyone I know is going to die and/or become infertile, how could I ever find a wife I trust won't die on me, be infertile, or have kids that are then infertile. This is too perfect of a psychological weapon, this fear. Much like the CIA "leaking" documents on "muh remote viewing" it makes us think they have more power than they do. It's just too strategically convenient.

God please help us.

>>17805606

This leaves too many dead innocents, or sterilized. I can't see the good guys allowing this to be the case. In this psychological war, the enemy lost that move but is acting like they still made it is what it seems like to me, to keep us stressed and unable to organize. This is the thought experiment I'm trying to reason out.

>>17805615

This seems like a large leap to take. If we are to believe that everything Trump says is true, then he did say these shots are safe. I'm forced to consider this.

There is a lot of extremely negative shilling in the conceptual direction of "everything is bad, they will all die." and the specific effect this has in a psychological war is one of demoralization. It's too perfect for it to be anything else.

The good guys knew depopulation was the plan all along, why allow the vax?

This is one of the main reasons I'm skeptical that the vax was the killshot that it seems to be shilled as now. I'm never going to take it, obviously not going to roll the dice, but we know Trump is smart, the good guys are smart and knew their plan all along. I don't see the shot being rolled out in its killer form.

THIS IS PSYWAR. They want us afraid. They want us scared. They don't want us focused on anything else. I'm having a harder and harder time believing the patriots didn't prepare and switch the shots out. Remember some guy shooting up a vaccine delivery truck? What exactly was that all about? Will research more.

>>17805650

This is actually a good example of the demoralization shilling I'm talking about regarding the "everyone dies" scenario. You refuse to go along with the thought experiment by purposely misinterpreting what I present as a possible outcome, and expose your bad faith acting.

It is this type of shilling that is reinstilling my faith that things may turn out OK after all.

>>17805667

Baker, include this with my first post

Thank you anon, this is the best feedback I've gotten so far. Thank you for helping me flesh out these thought experiments. I have to consider all possibilities. The push for "fuck you, you should be more demoralized" has really thrown up red flags for me as I've been running down these options. It feels like the bad guys are exposing their strategy here. It's worthwhile to consider that Trump didn't want his family to be targeted so maybe the vax roll out compromise was that it could roll out, but it had to be voluntary, and the bad guys expose their media control in the process? It still feels like too many innocents die this way. I just can't rectify it. It feels off, and I focus so much on pattern recognition that this seems wrong in my gut. I recently watched "Died Suddenly," and the ONE THING they DIDN'T DO was:

Test the chemical makeup of the fibrous clots

Why would they not do that? Why would they have access to all the research and material and NOT investigate? Pied piper and demoralization psy op possibly. Have to consider it.

>>17805675

This anon is confirmed MOSSAD as the generic picture, condescending tone, and purposeful misrepresentation of the content of my posts. Please, for anyone reading this exchange, consider what I say.

>>17805705

You are MOSSAD. You suggest nobody pays anyone to come here and shill and demoralize. Anons who are reading can see this. I've been on the chans since '14.

>>17805714

For any anons following this exchange, what I have suggested is that the vax rollout was known about and controlled by the good guys from the start, as they always knew their plan was depopulation. Thus the bad guys have to switch tactics, knowing that we have concerns about the lethality of the vax, and they pump the gas on our fears, keeping us on edge and demoralized as possible.

>>17805972

See this is exactly my take. Imagine all the children… The children that had no choice.

GODFATHER 3 DECODE

Haven't seen anyone do this in depth yet so here it is:

The plot of the movie is that the Corleone family has gotten so wealthy that they are essentially all legitimate, with wealth in stocks of major companies. They continue to expand and seek to purchase a large landlord company from the Vatican Bank. The Archbishop cons Michael Corleone though, by taking his initial "donation" and stalling while waiting on his full payment, at which time he would be assassinated. He figures this out, and both sides fight it out. He wins in the end but at great cost to himself.

This story is based on something that DID happen. There was a corrupt banker known as "God's Banker" named Roberto Calvi, a known freemasonic member of Propaganda 2 (who as an aside were freemasonic but banned from the main lodge because they were anti-communist… tells you something about the masonic goals…). Anyways this banker was using the Vatican Bank as an offshore bank essentially, and scamming people. There were corrupt elements of the Vatican in on this from the beginning. The Vatican Bank was an offshore bank LONG before anyone was using the Caribbean banks or whatever.

Here is where it gets really interesting:

The Corleone Family in this movie is the Rothschilds. They have given loans to the Vatican because the Vatican acted like it was poor and needed cash (their finances are actually private so this would be easy to fake). When they gave the money to the Vatican… well.. they didn't succeed in overtaking the Vatican. They have tried to infiltrate it in other ways… having masons become priests, undercut from inside, all kinds of things. Even assassinations. Pope John Paul the FIRST was killed by poison after only 33 (huh) days in office as he was trying to clean house quickly, and this is in the movie and is a historically accurate event.

As for who Soros is in the movie, he is Al Neri, Michael Corleone's fixer who assassinated the corrupt Archbishop. Soros is the guy who moves money around and takes down countries and organizations that the "family" designates as targets.

"Finance is a gun, politics is knowing when to pull the trigger…." Al Neri is Soros. Soros is the money man for Rothschilds.

I can answer any questions as there is a great deal of history involved in all this.

God Bless.

>>17806093

>>17806090

Godfather 3 decode worth reading.